The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dm6000b

Manufactured by Leica Microsystems
Sourced in Germany, Switzerland, Japan, United States

The DM6000B is a high-performance laboratory microscope produced by Leica Microsystems. It features advanced optics and illumination systems to facilitate detailed observation and analysis of specimens. The DM6000B is designed for versatile use in a wide range of scientific and research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

46 protocols using dm6000b

1

Histological Analysis of Bone Defect

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specimens with surrounding tissue were carefully harvested from the mandibular bone and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 3 days, and then dehydrated by immersion in a 70% to 100% ethanol gradient with immersion in each grade for 3 days. Finally, the bone samples were embedded in methyl methacrylate. Then, sections were prepared for pathological analysis using a modified interlocked diamond saw (Exakt, Hamburg, Germany). Then, all sections were stained with Villanueva Goldner and observed using a light microscope (DM6000B, Leica Microsystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland). The new bone area in the defect was measured using Image J ver1.51 software (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Bone Response around Implants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the bone response around the implants, histological and histomorphometric analyses were conducted. Eight weeks after the surgical procedure, rats were sacrificed and the specimens were collected. The specimens were then surgically removed, fixed, dehydrated, and embedded undecalcified in methyl methacrylate and stained with methylene blue/acid fuchsin. Histological evaluation was carried out using a light microscope (DM6000B; Leica Microsystems).
Micro-CT imaging was performed to assess the new bone formation around the implants. Eight weeks after implantation, the animals were sacrificed to retrieve the femurs with implants (four samples per group). Region of interest was defined as a ring with 200 μm radius starting from the implant surface in the coronal plane. The two-(2D) and three-dimensional (3D) views of the implant with the surrounding new bone were reconstructed. The amount of bone formed was determined in each section as a percentage of BV/TV, trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.), trabecular number (Tb.N.), and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Evaluation of Rat Knee Joints

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were sacrificed by inducing deep anesthesia with 2% isoflurane. Each rat was then perfused intracardially with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 4% paraformaldehyde at week 24. The knee samples were collected from rats and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin at room temperature for 3 days, and then decalcified for 2 weeks in buffered 12.5% EDTA with PBS. The specimens were embedded in paraffin and sliced into 1-µm sections. The sections were for hematoxylin/eosin (H&E) staining at 25˚C (2 min staining with 10 mg/ml hematoxyli; Mecrk; 15 sec staining with 1% eosin, Muto Pure Chemicals) and safranin O/fast green staining at 25˚C (10 min staining with 0.1% safranin O and 5 min staining with 0.1% fast green, Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Each section was examined under an upright light microscope (DM 6000B; Leica Microsystems, Inc.) and digital-image output system (SPOT idea 5.0 Mp Color Digital Camera; Diagnostic Instruments, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Culture of Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normal human nucleus pulposus (HNP) tissues were gently separated from lumbar trauma patients under aseptic conditions, washed with D-Hank’s solution 3–5 times, and then cut into small pieces with ophthalmic scissors(< 1 mm3). Subsequently, tissues were placed overnight in 5 ml of 0.1% type II collagenase (GIBCO, NY, USA) at 37 °C for 8 h. The digested fluid was filtered through 200 meshes filters, followed by filtration and centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was removed, and the precipitate was suspended in 3 ml of medium and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was removed again, and the NPCs were seeded into a culture flask in DMEM/F12 medium (GIBCO, NY, USA) containing 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS, GIBCO, NY, USA), 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin under 5% CO2 and saturated humidity at 37 °C. The culture medium was changed three times a week, and NPCs were subcultured at a ratio of 1:3 after reaching 80% confluence. Cell morphology was observed under an inverted microscope (DM6000B; Leica Microsystems, Japan). The concentration of HNPCs were adjusted to 1 × 104/ml, and the cells were seeded into 24-well plates with glass coverslips for 48 h. Cells were fixed in formaldehyde for 20 min, followed by three washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunocytochemical Visualization of Plant Cell Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Selected plant cell components were visualized by immunocytochemical reactions on resin-free sections with specific primary antibodies provided by Agrisera (AHB2, Cat. No. AS132 745) or PlantProbes (Univeristy of Leeds, Leeds, UK), as follows: JIM5 (Cat. No. JIM5), JIM7 (Cat. No. JIM7), JIM11 (Cat. No. ELD030), JIM20 (Cat. No. ELD033), JIM8 (Cat. No. ELD024), JIM13 (Cat. No. JIM13-050), LM5 (Cat. No. LM5-050), LM6 (Cat. No. LM6-050), LM8 (Cat. No. LM8), LM24 (Cat. No. LM24). Antibodies were diluted (1:20) in 1% BSA in 1× PBS buffer (pH 7.2). The sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Next, sections were washed 3 times with 1× PBS buffer (pH 7.2) and incubated with secondary antibodies (goat anti-rat conjugated with FITC, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; goat anti-rabbit IgG DyLight 488 conjugated against AHB2, AS09 633, Agrisera, Vännäs, Sweden), 1:500 diluted in 1× PBS buffer. All reaction steps were conducted following our optimized protocol [109 (link)]. DNA was stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the producer′s recommendation. The results were documented using a fluorescent microscope DM6000B (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar Germany). Control reactions were performed by omitting the incubation step with primary antibodies (Supplementary Figure S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Phospho-β-catenin Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from the LAMA-84 cell line (1 × 105) treated with PTPRG siRNA or scramble sequence, were subject to cytospin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Milan, Italy) and immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 4 °C. After three washing steps, slides were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies: 5 µg/mL phospho-β-catenin (Tyr 654) (ECM Biosciences, Versailles, KY, USA), 5 µg/mL total- β-catenin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Heidelberg Germany) and 5 µg/mL anti-PTPRG [44 (link)], in a buffer containing PBS/Tween20 0.05%/BSA 1%/NaN3 4mM, followed by the proper secondary Alexa Fluor-conjugated antibodies (1:2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Milan, Italy), for 1 h at room temperature. After mounting with an anti-fading solution, samples were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (DM6000B, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germay) and confocal microscopy (TCS-SP5, Leica Microsystem, Wetzlar, Germay).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Organ Histological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rats were then sacrificed and dissected. The brain, heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, and adrenal glands were weighed prior to macro and histological examinations. The organs were then fixed in buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned transversely in 2-mm steps at 4 μm, and finally stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). The specimens were observed under an optical microscope (Leica Microsystems, GMS GmbH, DM6000 B, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Muscle Fiber Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following HE or immunofluorescence staining, images were captured using an automated microscope (DM6000B, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with a 340–380 nm filter for DAPI; a 450–490 nm filter for PAX7, MYOD, actin or CD163; and a 590 nm filter for desmin or CD80. DISKUS software (Leica) was used to process and merge the images. The mean number of positive cells in each sample was obtained from at least two randomly selected fields of 0.24 mm2 within cross-sectional areas of muscle fibers. The fields containing adipose tissue, glands, or vessels were strictly excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (30,000–80,000) were seeded over glass coverslips placed into 24-well plates prior to treatment. At desired end-points, cells were fixed by 30 min incubation in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS. Cells were sequentially permeabilized with 0.1% (w/v) SDS in PBS (USB Corp.) and subjected to antigen blocking with 10% (v/v) FBS in PBS (both for 20 min). Primary antibodies employed were Bax, p21Waf1/Cip1, p16INK4a and phospho(Ser10)-Histone H3 (Table 2). Secondary antibodies were Goat anti-Mouse or anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Secondary Antibodies, conjugated either with Alexa Fluor® 488 or 594 (ThermoFisher Scientific: #A-11001, #A-11005, #A-11008 and #A-11012). DNA counterstaining was performed upon 10 min incubation with 5 μg/mL solution of DAPI (Molecular Probes). Photographs were taken with either an Axio Observer.Z1 (Carl Zeiss AG) or a DM6000B (Leica Microsystems) epifluorescence microscope. Images were analyzed with Image J software (freely available from the National Institutes of Health at the address https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Neurotrophin-Expressing Muscle Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis and quantification of muscle fibers showing immunoreaction for neurotrophins, four randomly chosen muscle areas in uvula were scanned at 40x magnification with a fluorescence/light microscope (Leica DM6000B; Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). The microscope was equipped with a color charged couple device (CCD) camera (Leica DFC490) and a digital high‐speed fluorescence CCD camera (Leica DFC360 FX). In each photograph, the total number of muscle fibers was counted manually, and the percentage of muscle fibers showing immunoreaction for neurotrophins was calculated. The percentage of neurotrophin‐positive fibers in each individual was calculated from four photos and the values for the uvula muscle is presented as the mean percentage (±SD) in patients and controls. A total of 3208 muscle fibers in patients (n = 2144) and controls (n = 1064) were evaluated and quantified for expression of neurotrophins. For detailed analysis of neurotrophin expression in individual muscle fibers, photographs scanned at 60x magnification were used.
Two investigators, who were blinded for the origin of the biopsies, analyzed the samples first separately and then together; the final assessment was based on a consensus between them.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!