The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pdc 001 hp

Manufactured by Harrick
Sourced in United States

The PDC-001-HP is a compact and versatile lab equipment product from Harrick. It is designed to perform a core function, but details on its intended use are not provided in this response.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using pdc 001 hp

1

Fabrication of PDMS Microfluidic Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PDMS (cat no. 24236-10; Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) was prepared using a 1:7 ratio of base and curing agent. Uncured PDMS was poured over the wafer mold, placed in a vacuum chamber to remove bubbles, moved to a 37 °C incubator, and left to cure overnight. After curing, small PDMS slabs with microchannels were cut using a scalpel, whereas cell loading ports were cut using a 0.4 cm hole punch (cat no. 12-460-409; Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH).
For making PDMS coated cover glass (cat no. 12-545-81; Fisher Scientific), 30 µL of uncured PDMS was pipetted at the center of the cover glass, placed in a modified mini-centrifuge, and spun for 30 s for even spreading. The PDMS coated cover glass was then cured for at least 1 h on a 95 °C hot plate.
Prior to slab and coated cover glass joining, PDMS surfaces were activated by plasma treatment (cat no. PDC-001-HP; Harrick Plasma, Ithaca, NY). Immediately after activation, slabs were bonded to coated cover glass. For complete bonding, the apparatus was incubated at 37 °C for at least 1 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fabrication of Superhydrophobic Silicon Micropillars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We fabricated well-controlled silicon micropillars using contact photolithography and deep reactive ion etching (DRIE). The test samples (silicon micropillars) were plasma treated (PDC-001-HP, Harrick Plasma) for 30 min and silanized using trichloro(1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl) silane in a desiccator. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the silicon micropillars before oil impregnation are provided in Supplementary Fig. 1. Following silanization, the silicon micropillars were impregnated with chemically compatible silicone oil of the desired viscosity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fabrication of PDMS-based Microfluidic Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The devices were fabricated in two phases (image of the process flow shown in Supplementary Materials). In the first phases, the silicon mould for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was fabricated at The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Nanosystem Fabrication Facility (HKUST NFF) using standard lithography and deep reactive ion etching (DRIE). The positive photoresist (HPR 506) was spun, exposed in Karl Suss MA6 (Munich, Germany) and developed by the FHD5 developer. The etching depth across the silicon wafer was 90 μm ± 2 μm measured by Tencor P-10 Surface Profiler (Hwaseong-si, Republic of Korea). The second stage was PDMS device fabrication. Here, 10:1 PDMS of 50 g was poured onto the mould and cured in the oven at 80 °C (24 h). The glass slide (SLItech, Lagos, Nigeria, microscope slides, MS-13) was bonded to the PDMS after 3 min of plasma treatment in the plasma cleaner (Harrick, Pleasantville, NY, USA, PDC-001-HP) followed by baking at 80 °C (40 min). The connecting tube is Tygon Microbore Autoanalysis Tubing, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Controlled Ferrofluid Deposition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each substrate was cleaned in a plasma cleaner (Harrick Plasma, PDC-001-HP) for 1 min before its use in the experiments. The neodymium magnet was placed underneath the substrate in order to secure the ferrofluid that was to be added on top of the substrate. The ferrofluid was added using a syringe. Adding a specific volume to a known surface area allowed us to control the thickness of the ferrofluid layer. The thickness of the ferrofluid in our experiments was 300 μm. The surface area of the ferrofluid on the substrate is the same as the surface area of the top surface of the magnet.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microfabrication of PDMS-based Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mixed base and curing agent of Sylgard 184 with a weight ratio of 10:1 was spin coated onto the PMMA mold at a speed of 400 rpm to obtain a uniform layer with a thickness of ca. 250 μm. After degassing and curing in the oven at 90 °C for 1 h, slowly peeling the cured PDMS layer off from the PMMA mold was followed by air plasma (PDC-001-HP, Harrick Plasma) treatment at 30 W for 10 min. Next, the PDMS layer was dipped in the APTES solution (concentration of 15 mM with 35.1 μL in 10 mL DI water) for 12 h to achieve strong adhesion followed by sputtering of 50-nm-thick Au (Quorum Q150R, Sputter Coater) as the bottom electrode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PDMS Device Fabrication Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The devices were fabricated in two stages as shown in the supplementary document. In the first stage, the fabrication of the silicon mould for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was carried out at The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Nanosystem Fabrication Facility (HKUST NFF) using standard lithography and deep reactive ion etching (DRIE). 3  μ m HPR 506 was spun, exposed in Karl Suss MA6 and developed by the FHD5 developer. It was used as a mask for etching in the DRIE Etcher. The etching depth across the silicon wafer was 90  μ m ± 2 μ m with multiple measurements by Tencor P-10 Surface Profiler, but the height of the single pattern was about the same. The second stage was done in a typical laboratory environment. 10:1 PDMS of 50 g was poured onto the mould and cured in the oven at 80  C for 24 h. The glass slide (SLItech, microscope slides, MS-13) was bonded to the PDMS after 3 min of plasma treatment in the plasma cleaner (Harrick, PDC-001-HP) followed by baking at 80  C . After inlets and outlets drilling and tubing (Tygon Microbore Autoanalysis Tubing, GM-06419-03) connection, the junction sealing was achieved by optical adhesion (Norland optical adhesive 61) with 2 h of UV light exposure in the light curing system (DYMAX, Model 2000 Flood) followed by 8 h of baking at 80  C .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fabrication of Lipid Bilayer Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The loading chambers for lipid bilayer and cells were manufactured by pouring polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mixed at 10:1 base to curing agent ratio (Sylgard 184 elastomer kit; Dow Corning) into a custom-milled polycarbonate mold with a rectangular plateau of 1.5 mm (width) × 6 mm (length) × 1 mm (height) raised from a flat-bottom surface. PDMS was cured at 80°C for 3 h, peeled off, and cut into individual devices. Circular inlet and outlet with a 2-mm diameter were punched at both ends of the PDMS chamber. Glass coverslips (24 mm × 40 mm; Fisher Scientific) were cleaned with piranha solution (36 M H2SO4:30% H2O2 = 3:1, by volume), extensively rinsed with deionized water, baked overnight at 400°C, and treated with plasma for 5 min before being permanently bound with PDMS chamber (model PDC-001-HP; Harrick Plasma). The PDMS chambers were treated with plasma for 50 s and permanently bound to the plasma-treated Glass coverslips for the subsequent lipid bilayer formation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fabrication of PDMS Microfluidic Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microfluidic device contains an array of straight channels, which was fabricated based on soft photolithography. Briefly, a silicon wafer was firstly spin-coated with a negative photoresist (SU-8 2025, Microchem, MA, USA) to generate a patterned layer 30 µm thick as the mold master. After exposure and development, the mold master was then silanized with vaporized (tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)-1-trichlorosilane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a vacuum desiccator > 12 h for more convenient release of PDMS from the mold. To fabricate the PDMS microchannel array, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Sylgard-184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA) prepolymer was prepared by mixing the monomer with the curing agent at a 10:1 volumetric ratio. After degassing, the prepared PDMS pre-polymer was then poured on the silicon mold and thermally cured in an oven at 85 °C for 4 h. Afterward, the fully cured PDMS was stripped off from the silicon mold, punched with holes for inlets and outlets, and bonded onto a glass slide (Citoglas, Nantong, China) by oxygen plasma (PDC-001 HP, Harrick Plasma, Ithaca, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Superhydrophobic Aluminum Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Boehmitization makes the aluminum plates wetting (hydrophilic). Further chemical treatment of the surfaces using low surface energy promoter coating rendered the surfaces nonwetting (superhydrophobic). The chemically treated micro/nanostructured surfaces were impregnated with Krytox oil, silicone oil, mineral oil, or hydroxy-PDMS oil depending on the surface chemistry. For Krytox oil, the boehmitized aluminum plates were fluorinated by placing them in a phosphate ester surfactant solution (Masurf FS-100) at 70 °C for 15 min in a forced convection oven. For mineral oil, the surfaces were functionalized by immersing them in a potassium cetyl phosphate emulsifier solution at 70 °C for 15 min. For silicone oil, the plates were silanized using trichloro(1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl) after 15 min plasma treatment (PDC-001-HP, Harrick Plasma). For hydroxy-PDMS, we used well-defined silicon micropillars. The micropillars were silanized using trichloro(1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl) after thorough wet cleaning using acetone, ethanol, and isopropyl alcohol followed by 15 min plasma treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fabrication of Hydrophobic Silica Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SiOH layer was created by exposing bare silicon to an air plasma in a plasma chamber (PDC-001-HP, Harrick) for 5 min at 300 mTorr. Plasma-treated wafers (referred to as “SiOH”) were prepared freshly before testing and used within 2 h. Passivation using (1H,1H,2H,2H-tridecafluorotetrahydrooctyl) trichlorosilane (FOTS) was achieved by taking the plasma-treated wafer and placing it into a vacuum desiccator with ~20 μL of FOTS. The wafers were exposed to FOTS under static vacuum for 2 h. Plasma-treating wafers before FOTS deposition produced substrates with roughness similar to the oxidized wafers.2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!