The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using fab3688g

1

Immunostaining of Skin Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin- or optimal cutting temperature compound-embedded tissues were sectioned and stained6 (link)7 (link) using the following primary antibodies (all diluted 1:100 unless stated otherwise) for immunofluorescence labelling: Lrig: R&D Systems, FAB3688G; CD26: R&D Systems, AF954; Sca1: R&D Systems, AF1226; PDGFRa: R&D Systems, AF1062; Collagen III: Abcam, ab7778, Collagen11a1: Abcam, ab64883; Elastin: Abcam, ab21610; Caveolin: Cell Signaling Technology, 3267; phospho-Histone H3 (Ser10) antibody: Cell Signalling Technology, 970; Active Caspase-3: RnD Systems, AF835; K14: Covance, PRB-155P, 1:500; GFP: Abcam, ab13970, 1:500; RFP: Rockland, 600-401-379, 1:300. EdU staining was performed with a Click-it EdU imaging kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Images were acquired with a Nikon A1 Upright Confocal microscope. Images of H&E- and Herovici-stained sections were acquired with a Hamamatsu slide scanner. Representative images of skin from two to three independent experiments with at least three biological replicates per group are shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolating Intestinal Stem Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue for FACS was prepared as previously described (Powell et al., 2012 (link)). Briefly, freshly dissected mouse intestine was prepared and isolated crypts from Lrig1-Apple/+ mice were collected by slow centrifugation (400 rpm, five minutes). Crypts were resuspended in 3% pancreatin solution for ninety minutes (Whitehead et al., 1987 (link)), pipetted to single cells, and then resuspended in Hams F12 media with 1% FCS. DAPI (1:10,000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was used as a viability marker. RFP-hi, RFP-mid, and RFP-neg populations were isolated with a Becton Dickson FACS Aria II using a 100 μm nozzle and placed on ice. Each cell fraction was subsequently stained with either anti-Lrig1-VU conjugated to Alexa-647 fluorophore (1:250) or anti-Lrig1-R&D conjugated to Alexa-488 fluorophore (1:250; #FAB3688G, R&D Systems) for thirty minutes on ice. Cells were then washed and subsequently analyzed on a Becton Dickson FACSAria II, using DAPI (1:10,000) as a viability marker. Cell doublets were eliminated on the basis of pulse width.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Characterization of Dermal Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dermal fibroblasts were isolated as previously described (Jensen et al., 2010 (link); Collins et al., 2011 (link); Rognoni et al., 2018 (link)). The muscle and fat from dissected neonatal or adult back skin were scrapped off from the underside of the skin using a scalpel and the tissue was incubated overnight at 4∘C in a Dispase (Sigma) only solution. The epidermis was then carefully peeled off and discarded, leaving the intact dermis. The dermis was minced using a scalpel and enzymatically dissociated with a mixture of 1.25 mg/ml collagenase type 1 (Invitrogen), 0.5 mg/ml collagenase type 2 Worthington), 0.5 mg/ml collagenase type 1V (Sigma), 0.1 mg/ml hyaluronidase IVS (Sigma) and 50 U/ml DNase 1 for approximately 45 min at 37∘C. Dermal cell suspensions were passed through a 70 μm cell strainer and washed three times with PBS before being labeled with the following antibodies: Cd24 PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience, Clone M1/69), Cd26 PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience, Clone M194-112), Ly-6A/E APC (eBioscience, Clone D7), Cd140b APC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 17-1402-82), Pref-1/Dlk1 APC (R&D Systems, FAB8634A), Lrig1 Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated (R&D Systems, FAB3688G). DAPI was used to exclude dead cells. FACS analysis was carried out with BD FACSCanto 1 or 11. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software version 10.5.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!