The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using anti cd11c clone hl3

1

Lung Cell Suspension Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung cell suspensions were prepared as described before31 (link). Briefly, after perfusion with heparin in PBS, lungs were minced, digested with DNAse/collagenase, lysed for red blood cells, and pressed through a 0.7 μm filter to generate a single cell suspension. Cells were stained with appropriate fluorochrome-labeled specific antibodies or isotype control antibodies. Intracellular cytokine staining was performed using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences). Mouse antibodies used include anti-CD11b (clone M1/70; Tonbo Biosciences), anti-CD11c (clone HL3; BD Biosciences), anti-Gr-1 (clone RB6–8C5, eBioscience), anti-CD3 (clone 500A2; BD Biosciences), anti-CD4 (clone RM4–5; BD Biosciences), anti-CD44 (clone IM7; eBioscience), and anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2; BD Biosciences). Cells were processed with the Becton Dickinson (BD) Fortessa flow cytometer using FACS Diva software, or the BD FACSJazz flow cytometer using FACS Sortware software (BD). Flow cytometry experiments were analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star Inc). As before34 (link), neutrophils were defined as CD11b+CD11c-Gr-1hi cells, monocytes were defined as CD11b+CD11c-Gr-1med cells, and recruited macrophages were defined as CD11b+CD11c-Gr-1low cells. Total numbers of cells within each gate were back calculated based on cell counts/individual lung sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry analysis was performed by Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Life Technologies) using FlowJo software (Tree Star). For Intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stimulated with 20 ng/mL phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate (Sigma) and 1 mmol/L ionomycin (Sigma) for 5 hour in the presence of a GolgiStop (BD Bioscience). The antibodies used were as follows; anti‐CD16/CD32 (clone 2.4G2; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD4 (clone H129.19; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD25 (clone PC61; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD103 (clone M290; BD Bioscience), anti‐GITR (clone DTA1; BD Bioscience), anti‐CTLA‐4 (clone UC10; BD Bioscience), anti‐Foxp3 (clone FJK‐16s; eBioscience), anti‐CD11c (clone HL3; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD80 (clone 16‐10A1; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD86 (clone GL1; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD49b (clone HMa2; BD Bioscience), anti‐LAG3 (clone C9B7W; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD11b (clone M1/70; BD Bioscience), anti‐Ly6C (clone AL‐21; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD115 (clone AFS98; eBioscience), anti‐F4/80 (clone BM8; eBioscience), anti‐CD206 (clone C068C2; BioLegend), anti‐IFNγ (clone XMG1.2; eBioscience), anti‐IL‐4 (clone BVD4‐1D11; eBioscience), anti‐IL‐10 (clone JES5‐16E3; eBioscience) and isotype‐matched control antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions from blood, spleen, or tumor were prepared for flow cytometric analysis. Red blood cells in blood were lysed using ACK Lysis Buffer (Life Technologies). Cells were incubated with anti-Fc receptor antibody (clone 2.4G2, BD Biosciences) in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) with 2% fetal bovine serum for 30 mins. Then, surface staining using the following monoclonal antibodies was performed: anti-CD8 (clone 53–6.7, BD Biosciences), anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, Invitrogen), anti-CD90.1 (clone Ox-7, Biolegend), anti-CD62L (clone MEL-14, Biolegend), anti-CD25 (clone PC61, Biolegend), anti-Ly6C (clone HK1.4, Biolegend), anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, BD Biosciences), anti-CD11c (clone HL3, BD Biosciences), anti-I-Ab (clone AF6–120.1, Biolegend), anti-CD24 (clone M1/69, BD Biosciences), and anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, Biolegend). DAPI or LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR Dead Cell Stain kit (Thermo Fisher)-stained cells were excluded from analysis. Samples were analyzed using LSR II (BD Biosciences) or LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) with FlowJo software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Profiling Immune Cells in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Naïve and infected footpads were harvested every 2 weeks after infection with L. major or L. major RFP. Samples were digested with 62.5µg/mL liberase TL (Roche, Mannheim, GE) and 0.5mg/mL of DNAse I (Sigma) in RPMI 1640 (GIBCO) for 1h30min at 37°C. After digestion, the enzymatic reaction was terminated by adding RPMI 1640 containing 5% of FBS (Cultilab). The samples were homogenized and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 400xg at 4°C. The pellet was washed, cells were counted, and 106 cells were plated in 96-well plate (Corning, New York, NY, USA). Surface staining was performed for 20min at 4°C using Fc block Fc-γ III/II CD16/32 (clone 2.4G2; BD), anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8; BD); anti-Ly6C (clone HK1.4; BD); anti-F4/80 (clone BM8; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA); anti-CD11c (clone HL3; BD); anti-CD11b (clone M1/70; BD); anti-CD8 (clone 53-6.72; BD); anti-CD3 (clone 145-2C11; BD); anti-CD19 (1D3; BD); anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5; BD). For intracellular staining samples were fixed and permeabilized using Fix/Perm Kit from BD, then stained with anti-NOS2 (clone CXNFT; eBioscience). Samples were acquired using FACs Canto II (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lung Immune Cell Profiling Post-Influenza

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BALF was collected on days 0, 7, and 8 post-influenza virus infection by flushing the lungs twice with 1 ml PBS. BALF was centrifuged, and the cell pellet was used for cell analysis. Cells were treated with Fc block (BD Biosciences) and surface stained with the following antibodies (at 1 µg/ml): anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, BioLegend), anti-CD11c (clone HL3; BD Biosciences), anti-F4/80 (clone BM8; BioLegend), and anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8; BioLegend). Data were acquired for equivalent numbers of cells on a FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software version 9. Cell types were defined as previously described (24 (link)). Briefly, neutrophils were defined as CD11bhi Ly6Ghi cells, and alveolar macrophages were defined as CD11chi F4/80hi CD11b cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In vivo Interaction Experiment with T. cruzi Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the in vivo interaction experiment, C57BL/6 mice (CD45.1) were irradiated at 900 Rads. Each irradiated animal received 10×106 bone marrow cells by i.v route, isolated from GREAT IFN-γ GFP reporter mice and REX3 CXCL10-BFP and CXCL9-RFP reporter mice (CD45.2). Twelve weeks after the transference, mice were infected with T. cruzi and, on day 12 after infection, spleens were harvested, then fixed with 1% of PFA, and labeled with DRAQ5 (BD, Pharmingen) and anti-CD8 (clone 53–67, BD). For experiments with REX3 mice, spleen cells were harvested on day 12 after infection, then fixed with 1% of PFA and labeled with: anti-CD8 (clone 53–67, BD), anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, ebioscience), anti-CD209a (clone MMD3, ebioscience), anti-CD317 (pDCA-1, Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD11c (clone HL3, BD), and DRAQ5 (BD, Pharmingen). The samples were acquired from ImageStream Ammis, and we used the Ideas software to perform the analysis. The double cells were selected based on aspect ratio versus cell area [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immune Cell Profiling of Post-Operative Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were prepared from the blood and brain tissues of control or surgery group mice at postoperative day 2. Brain tissues were dissociated by MACS Neural Tissue Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Teterow, Germany) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The cells were incubated with Fixable Viability Stain 510 (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA, United States) for 15 min at room temperature protected from light. After that, these cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies. The following mouse antibodies were used in this study: anti-CD45 (clone 104, #560694, BD Biosciences, San Diego, United States), anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, #561098, BD Biosciences, San Diego, United States), anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8, #127614, Biolegend, United States), anti-Ly6C (clone HK1.4, #128007, Biolegend, United States), anti-F4/80 (clone T45-2342, #565411, BD Biosciences, San Diego, United States), anti-CD3 (clone 145-2C11, #551163, BD Biosciences, San Diego, United States), anti-CD19 (clone 1D3, #561738, BD Biosciences, San Diego, United States), anti-NK1.1 (clone PK136, #45-5941-80, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, United States), and anti-CD11c (clone HL3, #561022, BD Biosciences, San Diego, United States). All acquisitions were performed using BD Biosciences FACSVerse™ and analyzed using FlowJo 10.4 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Lung Cell Suspension Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung cell suspensions were prepared as described before31 (link). Briefly, after perfusion with heparin in PBS, lungs were minced, digested with DNAse/collagenase, lysed for red blood cells, and pressed through a 0.7 μm filter to generate a single cell suspension. Cells were stained with appropriate fluorochrome-labeled specific antibodies or isotype control antibodies. Intracellular cytokine staining was performed using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences). Mouse antibodies used include anti-CD11b (clone M1/70; Tonbo Biosciences), anti-CD11c (clone HL3; BD Biosciences), anti-Gr-1 (clone RB6–8C5, eBioscience), anti-CD3 (clone 500A2; BD Biosciences), anti-CD4 (clone RM4–5; BD Biosciences), anti-CD44 (clone IM7; eBioscience), and anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2; BD Biosciences). Cells were processed with the Becton Dickinson (BD) Fortessa flow cytometer using FACS Diva software, or the BD FACSJazz flow cytometer using FACS Sortware software (BD). Flow cytometry experiments were analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star Inc). As before34 (link), neutrophils were defined as CD11b+CD11c-Gr-1hi cells, monocytes were defined as CD11b+CD11c-Gr-1med cells, and recruited macrophages were defined as CD11b+CD11c-Gr-1low cells. Total numbers of cells within each gate were back calculated based on cell counts/individual lung sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Adoptive Transfer of Lymphocytes for SLE-like Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolation of single-cell suspension from the spleens of 8-wk-old B6.CD45.1 mice was performed as previously described (Rose et al., 2012 (link)). Splenic lymphocytes were purified by negative immune-magnetic selection. In brief, spleen cells were treated with Fc Block and incubated with PE-conjugated myeloid-linage antibodies including anti-Ter119 (clone TER119; eBioscience), anti-CD11b (clone M1/70; BD Biosciences), anti-F4/80 (clone BM8; BioLegend), anti-CD11c (clone HL3; BD Biosciences), anti–mPDCA-1 (clone JF05-1C2.4.1; Miltenyi Biotec), anti-SiglecF (clone E50-2440; BD Biosciences), anti-NK1.1 (clone PK136; BD Biosciences), and anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8; BD Biosciences) followed by incubation of anti-PE MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and depletion on autoMACS Pro Separator (Miltenyi Biotec) with the “depletes” program. The resulting lymphocyte preparation was >80% purity as determined by flow cytometry. Each CD45.2. Rag−/− or CD45.2. Rag−/−LysMCreBimfl/fl mouse received ∼4.0 × 107 to 5.0 × 107 donor lymphocytes through retro-orbital injections every month over an 8-mo period and bled every month to ensure the efficacy of adoptive transfer. The recipient CD45.2. Rag−/− and CD45.2. Rag−/−LysMCreBimfl/fl mice were then sacrificed after 8 mo of adoptive transfer to assess SLE-like disease symptoms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multi-Marker Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained in 1X PBS containing 2% FBS and 2 mM EDTA for 30 min at 4°C and then fixed with 2% PFA for 15 min at 4°C. Single-cell preparations were stained with antibodies to the following markers: anti-Ly6C (clone HK1.4, BioLegend), anti-IgA (clone mA-6E1, eBioscience), anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8, BD), anti-SiglecF (clone E50-2440, BD), anti-CD11c (clone HL3, BD), anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, BioLegend), anti-IA/IE (clone M5/114.15.2, BD), anti-B220 (clone RA3-6B2, BioLegend), anti-CD138 (clone 281-2, BioLegend), anti-CD64 (clone X54-5/7.1, BD), anti-CD11b (clone M1-70, BD) and anti-CD5 (clone 53-7.3, BD). Dead cells were excluded from analysis using the viability dye BD Horizon Fixable Viability Stain 510 (BD). Data were acquired in an LSRFortessa X20 cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo v10.0.7 software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!