The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jmp pro statistics version 12

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

JMP Pro® Statistics, Version 12 is a data analysis software that provides advanced statistical analysis capabilities. It offers a wide range of statistical methods and modeling techniques to explore, analyze, and visualize data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using jmp pro statistics version 12

1

Broad-sense Heritability Calculation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Broad-sense heritability for each phenotype was calculated using the following equations (Schmidt et al., 2019 (link)):
In Equation 3, σg2 and σp2 correspond to the variances in genotypic impact and phenotypic measurements among the replicates, respectively. In Equation 4, σg2 , σgy2 , and σε2 represent the variances of the random effect of genotype i: Gi, the genotype i by year k interaction: (GY)ik, and the residual error: εijk, respectively. The terms y and β used in Equation 4 indicate the numbers of years and blocks, respectively. This study’s statistical analyses and visualization of the resulting data (e.g., histograms) relied on JMP Pro® Statistics, Version 12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Correlation Analysis of BLUP Datasets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 15 BLUP datasets (Supplementary Figure 3), calculated by the two equations (Equations 1 and 2), were then scrutinized by correlation tests to assess consistency across the 2 years within each trait as well as to inspect whether any interrelationship between different traits existed or not. Multivariate function equipped on JMP Pro® Statistics, Version 12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was utilized for all the correlation coefficient test trials. A correlation coefficient was considered statistically significant if its associated correlation probability was below the conventional 5% (p-value< 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Single-Marker Analysis of QTL Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After checking the allele effect of the QTL, single-marker analysis was pursued to check whether the allele effects were actually reflected in the original phenotype data or not, as well as to find the most fitted genetic models such as additive, simplex-dominant, etc. When a target QTL and the linked SNP marker were selected, we separated BLUP data by genotype, giving us two to five different groups. We then compared averages of the BLUPs of each genotype group to check whether a significant mean difference existed between two genotype groups or not. The presence of the significant mean difference can indirectly reveal allele effects on phenotype. For instance, if the “B” allele of an SNP marker is associated with an increase in specific gravity and has an additive impact, the greater number of B alleles in a genotype would be expected to confer a higher specific gravity. Tukey-Kramer mean comparison test (JMP Pro® Statistics, Version 12; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for the single-marker analysis (p-value < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multivariate Correlation Analysis of BLUP Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multivariate correlation tests were executed to elucidate similarity across the three BLUP datasets for each trait as well as to look into either positive or negative relationships between two different traits (Supplementary Tables 5, 6). A multivariate function in JMP Pro® Statistics, Version 12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to conduct all correlation tests. To discriminate the significance of the p-values of correlation coefficients, a p-value< 0.0001 was selected as the standard. Because only one-year data for the early blight damage was available, the correlation test for the three BLUP datasets within the trait was not performed. Instead, the 2019 raw phenotype data were directly used in the correlation test comparing different traits.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Heritability Analysis of Potato Tuber Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Broad-sense heritability of tuber shape and specific gravity was calculated using the following equations [34 (link)].
H2=σg2σp2
σp2=σg2+σgy2y+σgl2l+σgyl2y·l+σε2y·l·β
In eq. (2), σp2 stands for the variance of mean phenotypic measurements across replicates.
In eq. (3), the variances of Gi, Rj, Ll, (GY)ik, (GL)il, (YL)kl, (GYL)ikl, and Ɛijkl are denoted by σg2 , σr2 , σgy2 , σgl2 , σgyl2 , and σε2 correspondingly. The terms y, l, and β used in eq. (3) indicate the number of years, locations and replications, respectively. All the statistical analyses discussed here were conducted by JMP Pro® Statistics, Version 12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Broad-sense Heritability Computation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Broad-sense heritability of each phenotype was computed using following equations (Schmidt et al., 2019 (link)).
In equation 3 (eq. 3), σɡ2 and σp2 stand for variances of genotypic effect and mean phenotypic measurements across replicates, respectively. In equation 4 (eq. 4), variances of genotypic effect: Gi , genotype i by year k interaction effect: (GY)ik , and residual error: εijkl are indicated by σɡ2 , σɡy2 , and σε2 correspondingly. The terms y and β used in equation 4 (eq. 4) represent the number of years and replications, respectively. JMP Pro® Statistics, Version 12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analyses and visualization of resulting data (e.g., histograms) discussed in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!