The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism statistics

Manufactured by GraphPad

Prism Statistics is a data analysis and graphing software used for scientific research. It provides tools for curve fitting, statistical analysis, and visualization of data. Prism Statistics is designed to simplify the process of analyzing and presenting scientific data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

9 protocols using prism statistics

1

Circulating Glycoproteins as PKDL Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Values for each set of experiment were analyzed by calculating their respective medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Data representation was done by Box plots to show Tukey whiskers values, median and IQR. At first, all data sets were subjected for normality test using D'Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test. Univariate non-parametric ANOVA analysis (i.e., Kruskal Wallis test) was performed and if data represents significant value, post-hoc (dunn) test was implemented for defining differences within each group with p-values smaller than 0.01 were statistically significant. Cut-off value of circulating glycoproteins (PLG and VTN) was determined by using Youden index. Efficiency of levels of circulating glycoproteins (PLG and VTN) and anti-leishmania antibody titer (IgG), for prediction of MAC PKDL and its further progression, were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Sensitivity and specificity values for the same were calculated at different threshold points. Areas under curve (AUC) values were also calculated, which were statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the Graph-Pad Prism statistics software (Graph-Pad Software Inc., San Diego, CA) and SPSS Inc (Chicago, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microbial Analysis of Sardinian Milk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microbial counts were calculated as the number of colony-forming units (cfu) per milliliter of sample and reported as log10 cfu/mL. Calculations of standard deviations (SD) were also performed. The mean microbial counts of milk samples collected from two geographical areas of Sardinia were analyzed by Student's t-test using the software GraphPad Prism Statistics vs. 3.00. The significant level of test was set at P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Surgical Skill Evaluation: Global and Procedure-Specific Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The attending surgeon evaluator was provided with the Global Assessment 5-Point Rating Scale and Procedure-Specific Checklist (Adapted from Martin et al., 1997 and Araujo et al., 2014)8 (link),12 (link) and instructed to observe videos of the participants, which were provided in a randomized manner, without identification of the group assignment. Using the Global Assessment 5-Point Rating Scale, participants were awarded between 1 and 5 points for each category, with low scores awarded for poor performance and high scores for proficiency as described in (Table 1). Participants were also evaluated using the Procedure-Specific Checklist as follows: 1-point for every step performed correctly and 0-points if the step was performed incorrectly or not performed. (Table 2)
Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon and Fischer’s exact tests with significance defined as p<0.008 based on Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Statistics / Data Analysis software, GraphPad Software inc, La Jolla, CA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Skin Permeation Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were processed with SkinTools 3 (RiverD International B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands) and plotted using the GraphPad Prism Statistics software (GraphPad Software LLC, version 8.3.0, San Diego, CA, USA, 2019). The results obtained for each formulation were averaged to yield a single concentration profile. Normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistical test. For parametric data, statistical evaluation was performed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple comparisons between groups by a post hoc Tukey test. For non-parametric data, the Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. A probability of p  <  0.05 was considered statistically significant. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise stated. For the CRS data, the baseline fit contributions of NIA were subtracted from the measurements, and the results are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The IVIV correlations were plotted as mean ± SEM and were calculated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Data normality was assessed through Shapiro-Wilk test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze data presented in Figs. 16. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures was used to analyze data depicted in Fig. 7. Whenever significant F-values were obtained, Duncan adjustment was used for multiple comparison purposes. GraphPad Prism Statistics was used for the analysis and statistical significance was considered achieved when the value of P was <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Neurological Effects of Compound X

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Data normality was assessed through Shapiro-Wilk’s test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze data presented in Tables 13 and Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5A–B and D, 6 and 7. Whenever significant F-values were obtained, Bonferroni adjustment was used for multiple comparison purposes. Linear regression was used to assess the association between variables in Figures 5C and 5E. GraphPad Prism Statistics was used for the analysis. Statistical significance was considered achieved when the value of P was <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are expressed as the means ± the standard deviation (SD) and were analyzed with the Prism statistics software package version 7.0.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). The densitometric data from the western blot assay were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using Prism Statistics software (GraphPad software 7.03, La Jolla, CA). Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, ANOVA, Wilcoxon rank sum test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The data are presented as median values unless specified otherwise. The differences were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05 for two-sided tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA-seq Analysis of Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA‐seq data were statistically analyzed based on the TCGA and CRPC database.26 PCa patient survival rates were analyzed based on NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The Prism Statistics (GraphPad) was used for all statistical analysis. Statistical significance, < .05 (*) and < .01 (**), was analyzed by Student's t‐test. Data (mean ± SD) represented at least three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!