The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cefoxitin

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, France

Cefoxitin is a cephalosporin antibiotic used in the laboratory setting. It functions as a bactericidal agent, inhibiting the synthesis of the bacterial cell wall. Cefoxitin has a broad spectrum of activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

186 protocols using cefoxitin

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Disk diffusion method was used for identification of antibiotic susceptibility of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates to different antibiotics according to CLSI guidelines [16 ]. The used discs were; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) 20 μg/10 μg, ceftazidime (CAZ) 30 μg, ceftriaxone (CRO) 30 μg, imipenem (IPM) 10 μg, amikacin (AK) 30 μg, gentamicin (CN)10 μg, nitrofurantoin (F) 300 μg, ciprofloxacin (CIP) 5 μg and cefoxitin (FOX) 30 μg (for detection of AmpC production) (Thermo Scientific™ Oxoid, UK). Resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents is defined as Multiple drug resistance (MDR) [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Staphylococcus aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibiotics (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Washington, USA) were used for antibiotic susceptibility testing of S. aureus:
Amikacin (AK), cefoxitin (FOX), chloramphenicol (C), co-trimoxazole (SXT), ciprofloxacin (CIP), gentamicin (CN), linezolid (LZD), fusidic acid (FD), neomycin, norfloxacin (NOR), tetracycline (TE), penicillin (P), clindamycin (DA), erythromycin (E), tigecycline (TGC), teicoplanin (TEC), tobramycin (TOB), and vancomycin (VA).
All of the coagulase test positive staphylococci isolates were tested for resistance to FOX on MH Agar using 30 ug/mL FOX according to the standard guidelines of CLSI. As per CLSI guidelines, the resistant strains showed a zone diameter of <24 mm, while a diameter of >25 mm showed the susceptible (S) strains. Strains that were resistant to FOX were noted as MRSA [24 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Colistin Resistance Determination in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion method. The tested antibiotics were cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, amikacin, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, erythromycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam and colistin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). colistin resistance was further confirmed by the broth microdilution method. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of colistin were determined by the broth microdilution in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton II broth according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2017 guidelines [16 ]. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control and a range of colistin dilutions (Chem-Impex Int’l Inc., USA) between 0.25 mg/L and 128 mg/L were performed. Breakpoints of colistin susceptibility defined by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) [17 ] were used as follows: isolates with a colistin MIC  2 mg/L were categorised as susceptible, and those with a colistin MIC > 2 mg/L were categorised as resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus strains (NCCP 16830, NCCP 14567, NCCP 14754, and KVCC-BA0500624) were investigated using disc diffusion assay according to the guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [53 ]. Briefly, each of the S. aureus strains was aerobically grown at 37 °C on the BHI agar plate for 18 h, and colonies were picked and suspended in sterilized saline to meet turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard. Each bacterial suspension was spread on the Mueller–Hinton agar plate and incubated in the presence of antibiotic discs at 35 °C for 18 h. The antibiotic discs used were cefoxitin (30 μg), oxacillin (1 μg), penicillin (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), and chloramphenicol (30 μg) purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). After incubation, the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured to evaluate antibiotic resistance or susceptibility of S. aureus strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibacterial susceptibility testing was performed usingthe disk diffusion and the VITEK 2 system (bioM’erieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and interpreted by the protocol specified in the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2015). The antibacterial agents included cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefepime, ceftazidime, cefazolin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, amoxycillin, minocycline, piperacillin, azithromycin, nitrofurantoin, polymyxin B, and meropenem (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). MDR isolates were defined as resistant to at least three different classes of antibiotics. Isolates were defined as extensively drug resistant (XDR) if they were not susceptible to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antibacterial categories (ie, bacterial isolates remained susceptible to only one or two antibacterial categories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with the disk-diffusion method according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). From an overnight culture of each S. aureus strains, a 0.5 McFarland standard bacteria solution was prepared were inoculated into a Mueller Hinton agar (MHA; Biolife, Milan, Italy) plate. The antimicrobial discs, purchased from Oxoid (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basingstoke, UK), were penicillin G (P, 6 µg), cefoxitin (FOX, 30 µg), cefotaxim (CTX, 30 µg), kanamycin (K, 30 µg), tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), erythromycin (E, 15 µg), clindamycin (CMN, 2 µg), norfloxacine (NOR, 5 µg), ofloxacin (OFX, 5 µg), fusidic acid (FAD, 10 µg), rifampicin (RIF, 30 µg) and chloramphenicol (CHL, 30 µg). After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, the diameters of the inhibition zones around the discs were determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility of all the confirmed methicillin-resistant staphylococci and Mammaliicoccus was tested against a total of twenty-nine antimicrobials through the disk-diffusion technique on Mueller-Hinton agar. The following antibiotic (Oxoid) were tested: cefoxitin (30 µg), ceftaroline (30 µg), penicillin (10 UI), clindamycin (2 µg), fusidic acid (10 µg), trimethoprim (5 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25:23.75 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), minocycline (30 µg), enrofloxacin (5 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), gatifloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), norfloxacin (5 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), streptomycin (10 UI), kanamycin (30 µg), tobramycin (10 µg), sulfadiazine (300 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), tylosin (30 µg), lincomycin (15 µg), mupirocin (200 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), nitrofurantoin (300 µg), linezolid (30 µg), tedizolid (2 µg), rifampicin (5 µg), and vancomycin (30 µg). After incubation at 37 °C for 18 to 24 h, inhibition zones were measured and scored as resistant, susceptible, or intermediate (reduced susceptibility) in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute’s guidelines [40 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of GNB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility testing of the GNB was examined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion assay on Mueller-Hinton agar medium (Oxoid, England) against 18 antibiotic disks following the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines [17 ]. The following antibiotics were examined: amikacin (30 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanate (20/10 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), colistin (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (50 μg), piperacillin(100 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (23.75 μg/1.25 μg) (Oxoid, England). In brief, standardized suspension of each isolate conforming 0.5 McFarland turbidity was inoculated onto two Mueller-Hinton agar plates. Then, nine antibiotic disks were placed onto each plate with recommended distance, followed by overnight incubation at 37°C. The strain of E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as control and was tested each time when susceptibility testing was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The standardized disc diffusion method can be used commonly for susceptibility testing. The disc diffusion test was performed using Mueller Hinton agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India) with cefoxitin (30 µg) and ciprofloxacin (5 µg) discs (Oxoid Ltd.; Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK). The bacterial suspension of 1 × 108 CFU/mL of S. aureus ATCC 25923 and five MRSA strains were spread on MHA plates. The drug discs were placed over the plates, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 24 h.
Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) testing was conducted. Susceptibility to nutmeg crude and essential oil extractions were determined by broth microdilution methods performed using Mueller Hinton broth (Himedia, Mumbai, India). Briefly, the extractions were diluted using twofold serial dilutions from 5000 to 0.5 µg/mL of CE and 50 to 0.0005% of EO. Then, bacterial suspension of 1 × 108 CFU/mL of S. aureus ATCC 29213 and five MRSA strains were added in the wells, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. The experiments were performed according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic resistance profiles were obtained from 166 isolates. A standardized amount was inoculated (standard 0.5 of McFarland) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton (MH) agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) using interpretative criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) [34 ]. The following antimicrobials were used: trimethoprim/sulfametoxazol (SXT, 23.75 μg + 1.25 μg), gentamicin (GEN, 10 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 μg), cefoxitin (FOX, 30 μg), cefotaxime (CTX, 30 μg), meropenem (MEM, 10 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP, 40 μg), and cefixime (CFM, 5 μg) (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, United Kingdom). ESBL-positive isolates were identified by using the double-disk synergy test with third-generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefixime) alone and with clavulanic acid. Quality control was carried out using standard strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27953). Intermediate susceptibility to each antibiotic was considered to be resistant.
According to the definitions proposed by Magiorakos et al., resistance to three or more antibiotic classes was defined as multidrug resistant (MDR) [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!