The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 16.0 statistic

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 16.0 is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, statistical modeling, and reporting. The core function of SPSS 16.0 is to enable users to analyze, interpret, and present data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using spss 16.0 statistic

1

Fruit Color and Anthocyanin Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fruit of the plants were bagged on the 5th day after flowering and the fruit color and anthocyanin content were investigated on the 14th day under bagging condition. Color differences were assessed by the color index of red grapes (CIRG). A CR-400 colorimeter (Konica Minolta, Chroma Meter, Osaka, Japan) was used to measure the values of L*, a*, and b*. CIRG was calculated with the equation CIRG = [(180-H)/(L* + C*)], H=arctan (b*/a*), C=(a*2 + b*2)0.5 (Carreno et al., 1995 (link); Zhang et al., 2008 (link)).
The total anthocyanin content in the peel was quantified using the pH differential spectroscopic method (Cheng and Patrick, 1991 (link)).
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted on the CIRG value and anthocyanin content, and significant differences between groups were assessed by Duncan’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05) using SPSS 16.0 Statistics (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Validating RNA-seq with qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fourteen genes were chosen for the validation of RNA-seq using qRT-PCR. Primer Premier 5.0 software was used to design the primers, which are listed in Table S2. A total of 1 μg RNA per sample was reverse transcribed using a PrimeScript™ reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) in 20 μL of reaction mixture. The qRT-PCR was performed on a LightCycler® 96 instrument (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), using THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR Mix (TOYOBO, Shanghai, China) with the following reactions: 95°C 2 min; 95°C 30s, 60°C 10s, and 68°C 10s for 40 cycles. The PCR products were quantified by 2−△△CT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)) with normalization to the expression level of SmGAPDH (EGP1067575). Significant differences between groups were assessed by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05) using SPSS 16.0 Statistics (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors and Albuminuria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Continuous data were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). The differences in continuous data were compared using independent two-sample t-test. One-way ANOVA together with Scheffe post-hoc tests were applied for comparing differences among groups. The associations between categorical variables presented as count and percentage were evaluated with Chi-square tests. The associations between ACR and metabolic risk factors were evaluated by linear regression analyses. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to yield the odds ratios (ORs) of variables for the presence of albuminuria.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to assess the accuracy and discriminatory ability of MS risk factors in detecting albuminuria. The optimal cut-point for each MS risk factor associated with CKD was established based on the AUC and Youden’s index. All statistical assessments were two-sided, and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Statistical Analyses of Experimental Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were presented as mean±SEM, and the statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 Statistics. Unpaired 2‐tailed Student t‐test was used for comparisons between 2 groups, and 1‐way ANOVA followed by the post‐hoc Tukey multiple comparison analysis for multiple groups. Two‐way repeated‐measures ANOVA was used for comparisons between multiple groups when there were 2 experimental factors. P<0.05 means statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 statistics software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, followed by the Student-Newman Keuls post hoc tests. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All variables were expressed as mean ± s.d. or median and ranges as appropriate. The continuous variables were compared between LM and LI groups using the Student t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using a chi-square test. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 statistics software, and a P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated using standard formulae [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Correlation Analysis of Research Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS16.0 statistics software. Correlations between the parameters were compared by Pearson correlation analysis. Differences between independent samples were analyzed by t test. Values of P < .05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

One-way ANOVA and Tukey's Post Hoc

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance. Significant differences between group means were assessed by Tukey’s post hoc tests (p < 0.05) using SPSS 16.0 Statistics (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were processed with SPSS 16.0 statistics software; descriptive data were expressed as median (range) for continuous variables and as percent for categorical variables. Analysis of continuous variables was done using Mann-Whitney U test, and that of categorical variables was compared using the Chi-square test. A mean value and standard error of multiple data points were used to represent the final result. Student's t test was used in statistical analysis of the data between two groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multivariate Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparisons of mean values were performed using independent two-sample t tests with SPSS 16.0 statistics software. The associations between the variables of the categorical factors, including clinical outcomes and the expression of proteins, were calculated by Spearman's correlation coefficient. The significance of the difference between the variables of the categorical factors was determined using a two-tailed χ2 test. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the survival durations through the follow-up period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!