The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Zetasizer nano s instrument

Manufactured by Malvern Panalytical
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Zetasizer Nano S is a light scattering-based instrument used for the measurement of particle size, zeta potential, and molecular weight. It operates using the principles of dynamic light scattering (DLS) and electrophoretic light scattering (ELS) to provide accurate and reliable characterization of samples in the nanometer to micron size range.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using zetasizer nano s instrument

1

DLS and Urea Gel Analysis of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Changes in size of proteins following the reactions of apoTf and Fe2Tf with Ru complexes were determined by a dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique, using a Malvern ZetaSizer NanoS instrument (173° scattering angle, 298 K) with ZEN0040 disposable cuvettes (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK). Protein samples (0.10 mM) were diluted 10-fold with binding buffer before the measurements. The measured parameters were the averages of 12–15 scans (scan time, 3 s). Urea gel electrophoresis of apoTf and Fe2Tf samples [28 (link)] in the presence of varying concentrations of KP1019 was performed as described previously [29 (link)]. Analysis of Tf crystal structures that are available in the public domain from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) was performed with PyMOL software (version 2.1.1, Schrodinger LLC 2021, New York, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Nanoparticle Size

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and distribution of synthesized CNPs, pCNPs, CNP-SLB and pCNP-SLB were ascertained using dynamic light scattering on a Malvern Zetasizer Nano S Instrument (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). About 1000 μL of samples was loaded into a disposable cuvette, and the particle size was measured in triplicate readings for each sample to ensure the stability of the sample. All data were recorded as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). The significant alteration of particle sizes between the CNP and pCNP samples was subsequently evaluated by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with a p value < 0.05 considered as significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Stimuli-Responsive Nanoparticle Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The blank p(AAPBA-b-DEGMA) NPs were evaluated for their pH, temperature, and glucose sensitivity following the methods used in a previous report.33 (link) The pH sensitivity was assessed by placing the NPs (4 mg) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.1 M, 10 mL) at pH 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, or 8.5 and determining their size by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Measurements were undertaken at 37°C using a Zetasizer Nano S Instrument (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). Temperature sensitivity was studied in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4; NP concentration 0.4 mg·mL−1) by DLS quantification of the NP sizes at 12, 17, 22, 27, 32, 37, 42, and 47°C. Glucose sensitivity was explored by treating the blank NPs (4 mg) with glucose solutions (0, 1, 2, and 3 mg·mL−1) in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.1 M, 10 mL) for 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min at 22°C. The sizes of the NPs were subsequently measured by DLS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Magnetic and Optical Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MB was measured in a Varian V-3900 2T electromagnet using a standard polarization modulation technique38 . A HeNe laser was used (1.5 mW, 632.8 nm) to probe the dispersion contained inside a 5 mm thick optical cell (Hellma) within a temperature-controlled environment. (Cryo-)SEM was performed on a JEOL 6,330 Cryo Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope at an acceleration voltage of 3 kV in cryo-mode and 10 kV in dry mode. TEM was performed on a JEOL 1,010 Transmission Electron Microscope at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV. For Cryo-TEM a JEOL 2,100 cryo-Transmission Electron Microscope was used. The hydrodynamic radius was determined by Dynamic Light Scattering, performed with a Malvern Zetasizer Nano S instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing Polymer Self-Assemblies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrodynamic diameters (Dh) and size distributions of the self-assemblies were determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The DLS instrumentation consisted of a Malvern Zetasizer NanoS instrument operating at 25 °C with a 4 mW He–Ne 633 nm laser module. Measurements were made at a detection angle of 173° (back scattering), and Malvern Zetasizer 7.03 software was used to analyze the data.
Static light scattering (SLS) measurements were conducted with an ALV CGS3 (λ = 632 nm) at 20 °C. The data were collected from 12° up to 30° with an interval of 2° and from 30° up to 150° with an interval of 10°, calibrated with filtered toluene and filtered water as backgrounds. The refractive index (RI) of the polymer self-assembly in water was measured to be 0.13 mL g–1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Exosome Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma isolated from EDTA blood (25 mL) was centrifuged (Thermoscientific Heraeus Megafuge 16R) with 4800× g for 30 min at 4 °C to remove cell debris. Then plasma was diluted 1:1 in ice-cold PBS (Life Technologies) and filtered through a 0.22 µm sterile filter (TPP) and ultracentrifuged (Sorvall discovery M120) at 150,000× g for 8 h. After one washing step in PBS and another ultracentrifugation for 4 h the pellet containing exosomes were resuspended in PBS and protein content was evaluated by the BCA-based protein assay. Exosomes were isolated from cell culture supernatants of 60–70% confluent tumor cell lines, as described above. The amount of Hsp70 derived from exosomes of the FBS in fresh medium was subtracted. Size and uniformity of the exosomes were characterized by dynamic light scattering on a Zetasizer NanoS instrument (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) and by their protein content was determined by Western blot analysis using antibodies directed against β-actin (A228; Sigma-Aldrich), Hsp70 and Grp75 (SPS-825; StressMarq Biosciences Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Homogeneity Analysis of G4 DNA Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess sample homogeneity, dynamic light scattering (DLS) data were collected on a Zetasizer Nano-S instrument (Malvern Instruments Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada), equipped with a 633 nm (red) He-Ne Laser and a 173° backscatter detector (19 (link)) from the same hTR 1-20 DNA samples that were used for sedimentation velocity experiments (Supplementary Figure S3). The samples were centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 5 min in an Eppendorf™ MiniSpin™ centrifuge and then filtered through a 0.1 μm Millipore Ultrafree®-MC filter immediately before transfer to the 3 × 3 mm quartz cell (Hellma Canada Ltd., Markham, ON, Canada). The temperature was equilibrated to 20°C for 5 min before starting the measurements. The small size of the G4 required very long measurement times and only sample concentrations above 1.0 mg/ml concentrations provided enough signal. The sample preparations were highly homogenous and contained only trace amounts of aggregates or higher order oligomers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Particle Size Characterization by Zetasizer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analysed undiluted on a Zetasizer Nano-S instrument at 20 °C (Malvern Instruments., Worcs., UK) using a red laser at a wavelength of 633 nm and a Hellma Quartz-Suprasil cuvette Type 105.251.005-QS. The light path and centre were set at 3 × 3 mm and 9.65 mm, respectively. All data was recorded based on intensity and converted to relative percentage by volume using Zetasizer software v.6.20 and cumulants fit analysis. The stability indicating nature of this method was confirmed through forced degradation studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nanoparticle characterization by TEM and DLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed on either a JEOL 2100 FX or a JEOL 2000 FX microscope. Samples were diluted then deposited onto formvar grids. After roughly 1 min, excess sample was blotted from the grid and the grid stained with an aqueous 1 wt% uranyl acetate solution for 1 min prior to blotting, drying and microscopic analysis. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis was performed on either a high-throughput Wyatt DynaPro Plate Reader II or a single channel Malvern Zetasizer Nano S instrument.33 (link) Samples were diluted with filtered deionized water (0.45 μm, nylon) and the diluted samples were not filtered prior to analysis so as to ensure larger structures remained in solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dynamic Light Scattering of SaBADH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solutions were centrifuged and filtered prior to DLS analysis of SaBADHBME(−). A Zetasizer Nano S instrument (Malvern Instruments Inc., Westborough, Massachusetts, USA) and Zetasizer software 7.01 were used to perform measurements and determine the Z-average hydrodynamic radius (Rh), polydispersity index (PdI) and molecular weight (MW) using a globular polymer model. Data were acquired (ten acquisitions of 5 s each for each of the SaBADH concentrations) at 298 K using auto-attenuated He–Ne laser power (wavelength 663 nm) and a solvent refractive index of 1.33. SaBADH was tested at 10, 20, 30, 50, 80 and 100 µM in 10 mM Tris–HCl buffer pH 8.3, 0.5 mM TCEP and supplemented with 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 or 2.5 M NaCl or KCl. The analyzed data are an average of triplicate measurements over all concentrations of NaCl or KCl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!