The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using whatman gf f

1

Phytoplankton Pigment Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phytoplankton pigment composition was assessed daily in both seasons. Samples were taken from each mesocosm at a depth of 1 m every morning using a 5 L Niskin water sampler. Each sample (800–1500 mL) was filtered at low ambient light on a glass-fiber filter (Whatman GF/F, 25 mm diameter, 0.7 µm nominal pore size) using a low-vacuum pump, and frozen at − 80 °C. Pigment extraction consisted of two steps. First, the filters were placed in 2 mL of 95% ethanol and stored at − 20 °C for 1 h. Then, filters were sonicated and stored at − 4 °C for 1 h. Finally, the extracts were clarified using a glass-fiber filter (Whatman GF/F). The extracts were then directly analyzed using HPLC (Waters), following the method of Zapata et al.48 (link) and the detailed protocol of Vidussi et al.8 (link).
Some pigments can be used as taxonomic biomarkers because they are representative of particular phytoplankton groups23 (link)–25 . Accordingly, chlorophyll-b (chl-b) was attributed to green algae, prasinoxanthin to prasinophytes, fucoxanthin to diatoms, zeaxanthin to cyanobacteria, 19′-HF to prymnesiophytes, and peridinin to dinoflagellates. Ubiquitous pigments, being present in multiple groups, were not assigned a specific phytoplankton group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Testing of NaTMO2 Cathode

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pristine NaTMO2 powder samples mentioned in the paper were synthesized by the solid-state reaction following the previous literatures.[17 ,28 ] The cathode film was made by mixing powder of active materials, Super P carbon black (Timcal), and dry PTFE (DuPont) with the weight ratio of 80:15:5. A Swagelok battery was assembled using glass fiber (Whatman GF/F) as a separator, Na metal (99.95% Sigma-Aldrich) as an anode, and 1 M NaPF6 (98%, Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in EC:DEC (anhydrous, 1:1 volume ratio) as an electrolyte with the moisture level less than 3 ppm. The galvanostatic cycling was tested on Solartron 1470E. The cathode film loading density was around 2 mg cm−2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microplastic Isolation from Alaska Pollock

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microplastic isolation from the whole digestive tract (esophagus, stomach, and intestines) of Alaska pollock was performed following our previous method (8 (link), 52 ). Briefly, the procedure was run as follows: (i) The digestive tract of each fish was dissected out, weighed, and treated with a 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution. (ii) The sample was sonicated for 5 min before being placed on an oscillation incubator shaking at 90 rpm for 24 to 48 hours at 60°C to remove the organic matter. (iii) Extracted particles were vacuum-filtered through a 0.7-μm pore-sized glass fiber membrane (Whatman GF/F, UK). (iv) The membranes were placed in petri dishes and dried in preparation for microscopy visual inspection and μFTIR identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparation of Cationic Lignin Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Never-dried softwood kraft pulp fibers (Metsä Board Husum mill, Sweden) were used to prepare TCNF following the method of (Saito et al. 2007 (link)). Sulfur-free birch lignin produced by BLN process (named after the company that initially developed the technology) was provided by CH Bioforce Oy (Finland). Briefly, the process involves hot water (150 °C) extraction of hemicelluloses from biomass followed by alkali cooking to extract lignin, all in oxygen-starved conditions (von Schoultz 2015 ). The LNPs were prepared by anti-solvent nanoprecipitation in acetone and water (Figueiredo et al. 2021 (link)). These LNPS were cationized by coating with glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride (GTAC)-treated lignin to produce cationic LNPs (cLNPs) (Agustin et al. 2022 (link); Sipponen et al. 2017 (link)). The detailed preparation of TCNF, LNPs, and cLNPs and their basic characteristics are available in the Supporting Information (Fig. S2). Hexadecane, GTAC, cyclohexanone, and acetone were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Finland). The pharmaceutical compounds, which are certified reference materials, dialysis membrane tubing (Spectra/Por 7, 6–8 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO), Spectra/Por 1, 1 kDa MWCO), glass microfibre filters with a 0.7 µm pore size (Whatman GF/F), chromasolv-grade acetonitrile and methanol were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Finland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microalgae Dry Weight Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microalgae dry weight concentration Cx was measured gravimetrically by filtering given culture volume through a pre-dried and pre-weighed glass-fiber filter (Whatman GF/F, 0.47 μm pore size, VWR, France). The filters were dried at 105 °C for at least 24 h and then reweighed after being cooled in a desiccator for 10–15 min. The samples were analyzed in triplicates and the reported biomass concentration corresponded to the mean value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In situ Oceanographic Parameter Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The temperature, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, salinity, and pH of surface seawater were recorded in situ with a YSI EXO2 Multiparameter Sonde (YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH, USA) at a depth of 50 cm. For the analyses of nutrient content, samples were filtered through glass-fiber filters (Whatman GF/F, 47 mm, 0.68 µm), fixed with chloroform, and then stored at −20 °C. The concentrations of nutrients were analyzed using a continuous flow analyzer (Skalar San++, the Netherlands). For the Chl a measurement, 100 mL of seawater was filtered using Whatman GF/F filters after initial filtration through a 200 µm nylon sieve. The filter membrane was wrapped in aluminum foil and stored in a dark environment at −20 °C prior to spectrophotometric analysis. In addition, the samples were fixed with paraformaldehyde (final concentration of 1%) and stored in a freezer at −80 °C before bacterial density determination. After SYBR Green I (1:10,000, V/V) staining was performed in the dark for 15 min, the bacterial concentration was determined by flow cytometry (FACS Calibur, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Periphyton Biomass and Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sediment sample was diluted in a known volume of distilled water to determine the ash-free dry mass (AFDM) and chlorophyll-a concentration. For AFDM measurement, epipelon samples were ltered through a pre-calcined glass ber lter (Whatman GF/C) and stored at 100ºC until constant weight. Subsequently, the lters were calcined (500°C, 1 h) and weighed (APHA, 2012). The chlorophyll-a concentration (corrected for pheophytin) was obtained from samples ltered through a glass ber lter (Whatman GF/F) and extracted using ethanol (90%) for 24 hours in the dark (Sartory and Grobblelar 1984) . AFDM:Chlorophyll-a ratio was used to assess changes in autotrophic and heterotrophic periphyton components.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Establishing T. californicus Copepod Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected and established laboratory cultures of fifteen T. californicus populations across a broad latitudinal range of over 17° from Southern California to Canada in June of 2011 (Fig. 1A). In the laboratory, copepods were maintained in 250 mL Nalgene bottles filled with 100 mL of filtered (Whatman GF/F; porosity, 0.22 μm) seawater from Scripps Institute of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA and maintained at 20°C under a 12-hour photoperiod. Copepods were fed powdered Spirulina (Spectrum S1493) in solution at 10 mg per mL filtered seawater weekly and filtered seawater was changed occasionally. Cultures were maintained under similar conditions for 1 to 2 years prior to the start of our common garden and mesocosm experiment, which should be more than sufficient to eliminate maternal effects that confound local adaptation (Kawecki & Ebert 2004) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nutrient Analysis of Water Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water samples were filtered through a pre-combusted (500°C for 6 h) filter (GF/F Whatman), and stored frozen until analysis for nutrient concentrations at the University of Hawai‘i at Hilo Analytical Laboratory. Nutrients were analyzed on a Pulse Technicon II autoanalyzer using standard methods (NO3- + NO2- [Detection Limit (DL) 0.07 μmol/L, USEPA 353.4], total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) [DL 0.5 μmol/L, USGS I-4650-03], H4SiO4 [DL 1 μmol/L, USEPA 366]), and reference materials (NIST; HACH 307–49, 153–49, 14242–32, 194–49). Total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) was analyzed by high-temperature combustion, followed by chemiluminescent detection of nitric oxide (DL 5 μmol/L, ASTM D5176, Shimadzu TOC-V, TNM-1) [58 ]. Salinity, pH, and temperature were measured at the time of water collection using a YSI Pro 2030 multi-parameter probe.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Hospital Wastewater Sampling and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hospital wastewater samples (n = 11), including five influents (IN) and six effluents (EF), were collected from six different hospital treatment stations in North Vietnam, Lang Son (LS_EF) and Hanoi (ND_IN, ND_EF, RHM_EF), and South Vietnam, Can Tho (CT_IN) and Ho Chi Minh City (NHD1_IN, NHD2_IN, NHD3_IN, NHD_EF, CR1_EF, CR2_EF), according to US EPA 1694 guideline with some modifications. All samples were collected and kept in plastic bottles (1 L) prerinsed with ultrapure water in the laboratory and rinsed with sample on the sampling site. The samples were kept at 4°C using glaciers and ice bag and brought directly to the laboratory on the day of sampled collection or kept at −20°C and brought back to the laboratory on another day. In laboratory, samples were filtered by using microglass fiber filters (GF/F Whatman, ϕ ≤ 0.7 µm) helped by vacuum filtration unit to eliminate suspended matters. The prefilter (GF/A Whatman, ϕ ≥ 1.6 µm) was used if the samples have greatly been charged by suspended matters. All glass microfiber filters have been treated by baking at 450°C for 4 h in order to eliminate all organic contaminants. The filtered samples were stored in −20°C and then either extracted and analyzed within 48 h after collection or kept at −80°C until analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!