The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Agilent 6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer is a highly sensitive and selective analytical instrument used for the detection and quantification of small molecules in complex samples. It utilizes a triple quadrupole configuration to provide enhanced selectivity and sensitivity compared to traditional single quadrupole mass spectrometers.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

61 protocols using 6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer

1

Quantifying Amino Acid Biomarkers in Biofluids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentrations of PA, TYR, HPPA, HPLA and HGA in serum and urine were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry16 (link),18 (link). The published method was further validated to include PA, HPPA and HPLA (unpublished data). All analyses were performed on an Agilent 6490 Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer with Jet-Stream electrospray ionisation coupled with an Agilent 1290 Infinity II Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography pump and autosampler. Briefly this method incorporates reverse-phase chromatographic separation on an Atlantis dC18 column (100 mm × 3.0mm, 3 µm, Waters); initial chromatographic conditions of 80:20 water:methanol with 0.1% formic acid (v/v) increased linearly to 10:90 over 5 min. Matrix-matched calibration standards and quality controls were used with appropriate isotopically-labelled internal standards with quantitation in multiple reaction mode (PA and TYR in positive ionisation and HPPA, HPLA and HGA in negative ionisation). Sample preparation was by dilution in a combined internal standard solution containing 13C6-HGA, d4-TYR and d5-PA in 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in deionised water. Concentrations were adjusted to reflect the concentration differences between serum and urine samples. No internal standard was available for HPPA and HPLA at time of analysis and so 13C6-HGA was validated for use as the internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of DNA Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from E11 epiblast and FACS-sorted pPGCs was extracted using Quick-DNA/RNA Miniprep kit (Zymo Reasearch) following the manufacturer’s instructions and eluted in LC–MS grade water. DNA was digested to nucleosides using a using a nucleoside digestion mix (NEB). The nucleosides were separated on an RRHD Eclipse Plus C18 2.1 × 100 mm 1.8u column using the HPLC 1290 system (Agilent) and mobile phases 100% water 0.1% formic acids and 80% methanol, 0.1% formic acids. Quantification was carried out in an Agilent 6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer on multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM). To calculate the concentrations of individual nucleosides, standard curves were generated (dC and dG from Berry and Associated; 5mdC and 5hmdC from CarboSynth). All samples and standard curve points were spiked with a similar amount of isotope-labelled synthetic nucleosides (13C15N-dC and 13C15N-dG purchased from Silantes, and d3-mdC and d215N2-mhdC was obtained from T. Carell (Center for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany). The threshold for quantification is a signal-to-noise above ten (calculated with a peak-to-peak method). Limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.025 fmol for 5mdC and 5hmdC, and 0.5 fmol for dC and dG.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Targeted Proteomics by Nano-Chip-LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted proteomics was performed according to our recently published method [12 (link)]. Prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, four synthetic standard peptides were added to each sample (10 fmol/μL each) including Glu1-Fribrinopeptide B (Peptide Sequence: EGVNDNEEGFFSAR), M28 (Peptide Sequence: TTPAVLDSDGSYFLYSK), HK0 (Peptide Sequence: VLETKSLYVR) and HK1 (Peptide Sequence: VLETK(ε-AC)SLYVR). The trypsin digested supernatants were analyzed by a nano-Chip-LC using a 1260 Infinity Series HPLC system (Agilent) coupled to a 6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent). A large capacity protein chip (G4240-62010) with a 160 nL enrichment column and a 150 mm x 75 μm separation column (5 μm ZORBAX 300SB-C18, 30 Å pore size) was used and 1 μL of the sample was injected. Mobile phase A consisted of 97.8% H2O, 2% ACN and 0.2% FA, mobile phase B of 99.8% acetonitrile and 0.2% formic acid. A flow rate of 5 μL/min was applied for sample loading via the capillary pump and 400 nL/min for peptide separation via the nano pump. A 20 min gradient was applied for peptide separation while the total run time was 40 min including column regeneration. Total peak areas of peptides were exported from Skyline (Version 2.5, Ref. [17 (link)]) as csv-files and normalization was performed in Excel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Resveratrol and Ceramides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of PD and resveratrol was performed using an Agilent 1260 infinity HPLC system and a 6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Bio-samples were extracted as previously reported45 (link). The 5-μl extraction volume was injected onto the column and gradient eluted into MS. The MRM parameters were as follows: resveratrol = 227− > 185 (20.0 eV) and PD = 389− > 227 (20.0 eV).
HPLC-MRM was also applied to the bio-samples for ceramide analysis. Ceramides were extracted from plasma and tissues as reported previously46 (link). Statistical analyses were conducted based on the data acquired using the Agilent 1200 HPLC system and a 6410 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lipidomic Analysis of Palmitic Acid in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated with 250 μM palmitic acid (16,16,16-d3) from Cortecnet (Voisins-le-Bretonneux, France) applied as a BSA complex for 16 h at 37 °C. Afterward, cells were pelleted, washed, and lysed in an aqueous buffered solution. Aliquots were subjected to lipid extraction using 1.5 mL methanol/chloroform (2:1, v:v), as described [36 (link)]. The extraction solvent contained d7-dihydrosphingosine (d7-dhSph), d7-sphingosine (d7-Sph), d7-sphingosine 1-phosphate (d7-S1P), C17-ceramide (C17:0 Cer) and C16-d31-sphingomyelin (C16:0 d31-SM) (all Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, USA) as internal standards. Chromatographic separations were achieved on a 1260 Infinity HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with a Poroshell 120 EC-C8 column (3.0 × 150 mm, 2.7 µm; Agilent Technologies). MS/MS analyses were carried out using a 6490 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies) operating in the positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI+) [37 (link)]. MS/MS parameters for detection of canonical and deuterated sphingolipids are given in Supplementary Table S2. Quantification was performed with MassHunter Software (Agilent Technologies). Determined lipid amounts were normalized to the actual protein content (determined via Bradford assay) of the cell lysate aliquot used for extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Serum Metabolite Extraction and LC/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolites were extracted from serum using the extraction procedure described previously (Wangler et al., 2017 (link); Kornberg et al., 2018 (link); Amara et al., 2019 (link); Vantaku et al., 2019a (link); Vantaku et al., 2019b (link); Vantaku et al., 2019c (link)). Briefly, 50 µl of serum sample was used for the metabolic extraction. The extraction step was started with the addition of 750 µL ice-cold methanol: water (4:1) containing 20 µL spiked internal standards to each cell pellet or tissue sample. Ice-cold chloroform and water were added at a 3:1 ratio for a final proportion of 1:4:3:1 water:methanol:chloroform:water. The organic (methanol and chloroform) and aqueous layers were mixed, dried, and resuspended with 50:50 methanol: water. The extract samples were deproteinized, followed by resuspension, and subjected to LC/MS analysis.
Ten µL of suspended samples were injected and analyzed using a 6,490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) coupled to an HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) via single reaction monitoring (SRM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Biomarker Profiling in Plasma and Urine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both urine and plasma samples were used to measure endogenous biomarkers (see Figure 1 for details and abbreviations for each analyte and biomarker). We measured inflammatory markers in plasma samples at the University of Michigan Cancer Center Immunology Core, including four cytokines using the Milliplex Multiplex Assay Simultaneous High Sensitivity Human Cytokine Magnetic Bead Panel (EMD Millipore Corp.) and C-reactive protein using a DuoSet enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R&D Systems). We quantified plasma concentrations of the angiogenic biomarkers PGF and sFlt-1 using the ARCHITECT immunoassay (Abbott Laboratories). In addition, we measured a panel of 53 eicosanoids in plasma using a 6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent). Three unique protein damage markers NY, DY, and CY) were measured in plasma samples using ESI-MS/MS. Finally, two oxidative stress markers were measured in urine samples at Cayman Chemical: 8-IP, which was quantified via affinity column chromatography and enzyme immunoassay, and 8-OHdG, which was quantified with direct dilution and enzyme immunoassay. Endogenous biomarkers that were below the LOD were imputed with the LOD value divided by the square root of 2. More extensive details on analysis and measurement of endogenous biomarkers have been previously described (Aung et al. 2019b (link); Ferguson et al. 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Lipidomic Profiling of Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
These details have been described fully in Sung et al. [1 (link)]. However, briefly, plasma samples were extracted in CHCl3:MeOH (2:1) together with an internal standard mix containing non-physiological or stable isotope-labelled lipid standards, as previously described [17 (link)]. Lipidomic analysis was performed by UHPLC ESI-MS/MS, using an Agilent 1290 HPLC coupled to an Agilent 6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Results from the chromatographic data were analyzed using Mass Hunter Quant where relative lipid abundances were calculated by relating the area under the chromatogram for each lipid species to the corresponding internal standard. Correction factors were applied to adjust for different response factors, where these were known [18 (link)]. Species that were chromatographically separated were labelled as such (e.g., PC(16:0–22:6) and PC(18:2–20:4)), whereas species that were mixed isomers were given the standard phospholipid notation (e.g., PC(40:8) was a mixture of 20:4/20:4 and 18:2–22:6) [18 (link)]. Where structural details were sufficient, lipids were manually annotated as containing long-chain omega-3 components (i.e., 20:5 EPA, 22:5 DPA, and 22:6 DHA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Ceramides and Sphingomyelins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following lipid extraction with methanol:chloroform (2:1, v/v) as described [16 (link)], ceramides and sphingomyelins were quantified by LC–MS/MS using a 6490 triple–quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) operating in the positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI +) [36 (link)]. Quantification was performed with MassHunter Software (Agilent Technologies). Sphingolipid amounts were normalized to protein content (in vivo experiments) or cell numbers (in vitro experiments. As such, concentrations per mg protein (in vivo experiments) or per 1 million cells (in vitro experiments) were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Endocannabinoids in Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microglia (post 24 h drug treatment) were aspirated and washed with PBS 1× to remove residual culture media. Cells were suspended in 250 μL of 70% methanol and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Details regarding sample preparation can be found in the Supplementary Methods section. In brief, solid phase extraction was performed to enrich for molecules of interest followed by drying with N2 and reconstitution in 200 μL of resuspension buffer (7:1.5:1.5 0.1% acetic acid:acetonitrile: isopropanol). LC/MS/MS analysis of endocannabinoids was performed as described previously (Gouveia-Figueira and Nording, 2015 (link)) with some modifications (for details see Supplementary Methods). Briefly, mass spectrometric analysis was performed on an Agilent 6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in positive ionization mode. Quantitation of endocannabinoids was achieved using a general isotope dilution strategy. Calibration standards were analyzed over a range of concentrations from 0.2–40 pg on column for all of the ethanolamides. At least three independent experiments were run per treatment group. Concentrations of AEA (pg/mL) was used as the dependent factor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!