The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using autosamdri 931

1

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Salmonella Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rugose and smooth morphotype biofilm morphology was also studied by using scanning electron microscopy. Salmonella biofilm was developed on Nunc Thermanox polystyrene cover slips (MA, USA) and the SS coupons at 25°C for 48 h. Coverslips and coupons were washed three times with sterile saline to remove loosely attached cells and fixed in 1/2 strength Karnowsky’s fixative (pH 7.2) overnight at 4°C. Both coverslip and coupons were washed three times with sterile distilled water and post fixed in 2% buffered (0.1 M sodium cacodylate) osmium tetroxide, followed by dehydration through a graded ethanol series [35, 50, (2X) 70, (2X) 95, and (4X) 100]. The coverslips and coupons were later dried using a critical point dryer (Autosamdri®-931, Tousimis) and sputter-coated with platinum (20 nm). Thereafter, coverslips were analyzed on a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-6500F Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope, MA, USA) to obtain micrographs. Four randomly selected areas were analyzed to study rugose and smooth morphotype biofilm formation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SEM Sample Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain scanning electron microscopy images, following preservation in 70% ethanol, specimens were dehydrated using a graded series of ethanol. Excess 70% ethanol was removed from around the sample using a transfer pipette before being replaced by 80% ethanol for 20 min. This step was repeated with 90% ethanol and followed by 100% anhydrous ethanol dehydration three times. Samples were then dried in liquid CO₂ in a Tousimis® Autosamdri-931 critical point dryer (USA). A carbon tab was used to attach samples to a stub before gold coating (25 mA for 2 min) in an Emitech K550X Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies, UK). Samples were examined in a scanning electron microscope (JCM-5000 Benchtop SEM NeoScope, Jeol Ltd, USA) with accelerating voltage set at 10-15kv.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial Cell Imaging by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
200 µL of curliated bacterial cultures were vacuum filtered onto Nuclepore filters (0.22 µm pore size; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences), rinsed, and fixed with 2% formaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde solution overnight at 4 °C. Then, samples were washed with Millipore water for 15 minutes, dehydrated with gradient steps of ethanol (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 100%) – 15 minutes for each step – and dried with Critical Point Dryer (Autosamdri®-931, Tousimis®). Finally, the samples were sputter coated with 80:20 Pt:Pd and analyzed on a Zeiss Supra55VP FE-SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SEM Analysis of Rat Otolithic Organs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rats with the 4VO were sacrificed seven days after the procedure under anesthesia using inhalation of 2% isoflurane. Rats in the sham group were sacrificed without any procedures at the same weeks in 4VO model, after exposing the heart, we made a small incision through the apex of the left ventricle to insert the perfusion catheter and another small incision in the right auricle to let the perfusate escape. Subsequent to transcardiac perfusion with 200 mL of normal saline for exsanguination, the rats were perfused with 300 mL of 4% formaldehyde. The temporal bones containing the inner ear were dissected out and then immersed in the Karnoysky’s fixative (2% glutaraldehyde–2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) for two hours at 4℃. The otolithic organs were dissected under the stereo microscope (Stemi-305, ZEISS; Oberkochen, Germany) and again immersed in the Karnoysky’s fixative for six hours at 4℃. And then the tissues were washed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer and postfixed with 1% OsO4 for 1.5 hours. Then, we performed dehydration by gradually increasing the concentrations of ethanol, drying with the critical point dryer (Autosamdri-931, tousimis; Rockville, MD, USA), and coating with platinum by ion sputter (EM-ACE600, Leica; Wetzlar, Germany). The specimens were then subjected to scanning electron microscope (SEM; MERLIN, ZEISS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fabrication and Characterization of 3D Lattice Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were fabricated out of IP‐Dip photoresist via two‐photon lithography using a commercially available system (Photonic Professional GT, Nanoscribe GmbH). Each sample was written on a Si substrate using laser power and scan speed of 15 mW and 10 mm s−1, respectively. All lattices were printed with equal hatching and slicing distance of 0.1 µm, with the exception of monolithic octahedron lattices that were printed with hatching and slicing distances of 0.2 and 0.1 µm, respectively; for both woven and monolithic lattices, a contour line was printed on the perimeter of each printed cross‐section. All IP‐Dip pillars were printed with equal hatching and slicing distance of 0.2 µm and without contour line. For tension and tension‐to‐compression samples, the Si substrates were silanized prior to writing to improve adhesion between the samples and the chips. Critical point drying was performed on written samples using Autosamdri 931 (Tousimis). To ensure that the tested lattice samples had relative densities close to the intended design, radii of selected fibers were measured from the top and/or the side of each sample. Fiber cross‐sectional areas were then estimated using the radii measurements and compared to the cross‐sectional area in the design.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Structural Analysis of Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM examination (Hitachi S4800 FEG), hydrogels were cut to expose cross-sections after plunge-freezing in liquid nitrogen, and dried by critical point drying (CPD; Tousimis Autosamdri 931). Chemical structures of samples were investigated by FTIR (Thermo Fisher IS50), Raman spectroscopy (DXRxi, Thermo Fisher), and XPS (K-Alpha, Thermo Fisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fabrication of Intertwined Polymeric Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We first fabricated polymeric intertwined and monolithic structures out of IP-Dip photoresist using two-photon lithography via a commercially available Photonic Professional GT system (Nanoscribe GmbH). All structures were additively manufactured on a silanized Si substrate with laser power and scan speed set at 15 mW and 10 mm s−1, respectively. Structures originating from the same batch were printed on the same Si substrate within one printing run. An equal hatching (dh) and slicing (ds) distance of 0.1 μm was prescribed for each intertwined rhombus structure and monolithic structure (pillar and plate). The base and top cap of each monolithic pillar was printed using dh = ds = 0.1 μm, while the base and top cap for each intertwined structure had dh = ds = 0.2 μm. IP-Dip plates of dimensions 3.5 μm by 3.5 μm by 0.3 μm (L by W by H) were fabricated with dh = ds = 0.1 μm for XPS analysis. All samples were developed in propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate for ~20 min and subsequently dried via critical point drying in Autosamdri 931 (Tousimis). To fabricate passivated structures, select polymer structures were conformally coated with 5-nm-thickness Al2O3 using a plasma-enhanced ALD process inside a FlexAL II system (Oxford Instruments). The chamber was held at 200°C, and trimethylaluminum and O2 were used as precursors, resulting in a growth rate of 1.2 Å/cycle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cellulose Hydrogel Fabrication and Drying

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrogels were produced by directly mixing 150 μL of 1 M NaCl into 850 μL of the cellulose dispersion (0.072 wt%) in a mould (d = 1.6 cm). The mould was sealed with parafilm and left to gel overnight. Alternatively, 940 μL of the dispersion (0.065 wt%) was mixed with 60 μL 0.1 M HCl.
An alternative way for hydrogel formation was by diffusion. A mould filled with 1 mL of the fibril dispersion (0.061 wt%) was dipped into a NaCl (150 mM) or an HCl (6 mM) solution. A dialysis membrane (Spectrum Laboratories Standard RC Tubing, 6–8 kDa cut off) and a Teflon membrane (Sigma-Aldrich, 1.0 μm × 47 mm), which prevented the gel from sticking to the cellulose-based dialysis membrane, were used to cover the mould to allow the diffusion of the salt and protons into the dispersion.
Hydrogels were carried over into a customized metal mesh cage and placed in 100 mL of 50% EtOH at 5 °C for 24 h for solvent exchange. The second and third exchanges took place in 97% EtOH (100 mL), and in 99% EtOH (50 mL), respectively, followed by supercritical CO2 drying (Tousimis, Autosamdri 931).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Supercritical Drying of Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections to be imaged were rinsed for 10 s in ice-chilled 150 mm ammonium acetate buffer, followed immediately by 100% isopropyl alcohol for 30 s. The rinsed sections were dried using an Autosamdri-931 supercritical dryer (Tousimis, Rockville, MD) with 100% isopropyl alcohol as the intermediate fluid and “bone dry” liquid carbon dioxide (SJ Smith, Davenport, IA) as the supercritical fluid. Supercritical drying was begun by submerging tissue sections in 10 ml of 100% isopropyl alcohol in the supercritical drying chamber. The chamber was then slow filled with liquid carbon dioxide for 90 s before being fully filled at the regular flow rate for 30 s. The isopropyl alcohol was purged from the sample chamber with liquid carbon dioxide for 4 min. After purging, the chamber pressure and temperature were raised and held at above 1200 p.s.i. and 31 °C for 4 min. The chamber was returned to ambient conditions by slowly bleeding the pressure to 550 p.s.i. before fully venting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Critical Point Drying and SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The printed samples are prepared using a critical point dryer (Autosamdri-931, tousimis) in the envrionment of pure ethanol and liquid carbon dioxide. Then the SEM images are taken by a Hitachi S-4800 SEM after coating with a gold/palladium (60:40) layer for around 20 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!