The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using visiomorph software

1

Quantifying Picrosirius Red Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraformaldehyde fixed paraffin embedded sections were sectioned at 5 μm (rotary microtome) onto superfrost slides (VWR International, United States). Slides were deparaffinized, re-hydrated and then stained using picrosirius red solution and differentiated using acid water. Slides were then dehydrated using ethanol and xylene, mounted using cytoseal resin and scanned at 40× magnification using a NanoZoomer-XR (Hamamatsu, Japan) to produce whole-slide images, which were then analyzed using the Visiomorph software (Visiopharm, Denmark) in the VIS program suite. Total area of Picrosirius Red staining was quantified as a percentage of total tissue area using custom thresholds at 20× magnification. Correct quantification of the staining was confirmed by visual examination by a trained individual who was blinded to the treatment groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Assessment of MMP-2 Expression in Glioblastoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All 89 slides were scanned on a Hamamatsu NanoZoomer 2.0–HT whole slide scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Japan) at 20x magnification. Digital image analysis and quantitation were performed using Visiomorph software (Visiopharm, Denmark). Regions of interests containing tumor tissue were manually outlined followed by a systematic uniform random meander sampling using a sampling fraction of 10% and a 20x objective. The optimal sampling fraction was determined in a pilot study on 10 GBM specimens as previously described [30 (link), 31 ]. Sample images were reviewed and excluded according to the following criteria: viable tumor tissue < 50%, staining artefacts > 50%, necrotic foci > 50%, and normal brain tissue > 50%.
MMP-2 was quantified using a trained pixel classifier based on Bayesian classification. The mean MMP-2 intensity was measured in a three μm perimeter around the detected nuclei covering the cytoplasm/membrane or parts of the cytoplasm/membrane (Fig 1). The output data were given in RGB color model values ranging between 0–255 with low values equaling darker staining and high values equaling weaker staining. The average MMP-2 expression was calculated for all 89 tumors. Next, data was normalized for each patient by subtracting the measured RGB value from 255. The normalized values were then used in subsequent analyses. Patient data are available in S1 File.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Lesion and Astrogliosis Volumes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The volume of the lesion and the volume of astrogliosis were determined from the area of every tenth LFB- or GFAP/Nissl/DAPI-stained section sampled by systematic uniform random sampling. The area of the lesion site was estimated in LFB-stained sections as previously described [13 (link)] using the VisioMorph software (Visiopharm, Hørsholm, Denmark) and the Cavalieri principle for volume estimation. For estimation of the lesion area in GFAP/Nissl/DAPI-stained sections, photomicrographs were acquired using an Olympus BX51 microscope with an Olympus DP73 camera connected to a PC setup with the Olympus cellSens Imaging software (Ballerup, Denmark). Lesion size was then estimated using Image J analysis software (NIH) as per directions of the Image J developers (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij) [13 (link)]. Analysis performed on digital images was carried out on un-manipulated pictures. On the presented pictures the contrast and curves have been adjusted to allow readers to appreciate the details on small-scale figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of Pancreatic β-Cell Mass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pancreata were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h, processed in paraffin, and analyzed as previously described (9 (link)). Paraffin blocks were cut into 3-μm sections and stained with guinea pig anti-insulin (Dako) and rabbit anti-Nkx6.1 antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich). Insulin immunoreactivity was visualized with goat anti-guinea pig (Invitrogen) secondary antibody and donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 488 (The Jackson Laboratory). Nkx6.1 immunoreactivity was used to identify β-cells and visualized with donkey anti-rabbit biotin (The Jackson Laboratory), streptavidin horseradish peroxidase (PerkinElmer), and TSA Plus Cyanine 3 (Invitrogen). The slides were counterstained with DAPI to detect cell nuclei and scanned on a VS120 slide scanner at 10× magnification (Olympus), and pancreatic β-cell mass was quantified using Visiomorph software (Visiopharm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Heart Histology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), Oil Red O (ORO) and H&E stained sections of dissected or in situ hearts were scanned at 40× magnification using the Nanozoomer HT whole microscope slide scanning system (Hamamatsu, Japan) in the Pediatric BioBank and Analytical Tissue Core at the CRI and MCW. Three stained sections were analyzed per individual heart. The area data of the ventricle lumina were determined using the area tool in NDPView software (version 2.5), and transferred to an Excel worksheet for further analysis. Quantitative analysis for the P0 ventricle size was performed using the area tool in the NDPView software to determine the ventricle area. Quantitative analysis for PAS/glycogen and Oil Red O/lipid content in heart sections was performed using Visiomorph software (Visiopharm, Denmark). The software was trained to detect dark pink pixels for PAS, red pixels for ORO staining, blue pixels for unstained tissue, and white pixels for background. Linear Bayesian classification was used for segmentation into classes. The area values for the classes were transferred to an Excel worksheet, and the percentage of PAS or ORO content was calculated as [area pixels (PAS or ORO)/area pixels (PAS or ORO) + area tissue]*100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Kidney Injury Biomarker KIM-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histology was performed on sections from formalin-fixed kidneys as described in detail elsewhere [18 (link),22 (link)]. Stained sections were scanned with a 20× objective using a Scanscope AT slide scanner (Aperio, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) and quantitative image analysis was performed using Visiomorph software (Visiopharm, Hørsholm, Denmark). KIM-1 (AF1817, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was quantified in whole-kidney sections, expressed as proportional (%) surface area of immunopositive staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Lesion Volume from Histological Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The volume of the lesion was determined from the area of every 10th LFB- or GFAP-stained section sampled by systematic uniform random sampling. The area of the lesion site was estimated in LFB-stained sections as previously described [16 (link)] using the VisioMorph software (Visiopharm) and the Cavalieri principle for volume estimation. For estimation of the lesion area in GFAP-stained sections, photomicrographs were acquired using an Olympus BX51 microscope with an Olympus DP73 camera connected to a PC set up with the Olympus CellSens software. Lesion size was then estimated using ImageJ analysis software (NIH) as per directions of the ImageJ developers (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Analysis performed on digital images was carried out on unmanipulated pictures. On the presented pictures the contrast and curves have been adjusted to allow readers to appreciate the details on small-scale figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Tumor Necrosis via H&E

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors and organs collected at necropsy were rinsed in PBS, then weighed before formalin fixation and paraffin embedding. Tissue sections were cut at 4 microns, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), then scanned with the Aperio VERSA Brightfield Scanner. Tumor necrosis was unbiasedly quantified using Visiomorph software (Visiopharm, Hoersholm, Denmark), where a colour deconvolution algorithm specific to H&E was applied to the entire scanned tissue. Areas displaying low nuclear (hematoxylin) density are commonly considered to be necrotic tissue in pathology, so we applied the same principle for quantification: % necrotic area = areas of low nuclear density/whole tissue area. No differences in histology were observable by H&E or by the eye when assessing for organ toxicity, so quantification was not performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Liver Histology Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline liver biopsy and terminal samples were collected from the left lateral lobe (about 50–100 mg at baseline and 200 mg at the end) and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde. Liver tissue was paraffin embedded and sectioned (3 µm thickness). Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Sirius Red to assess hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, respectively, followed by analysis with Visiomorph software (Visiopharm, Denmark). Col1a1 and galectin‐3 were assessed using IHC staining. A blinded to the study pathologist performed the histological assessment and scoring. NAFLD activity score (NAS; steatosis/inflammation/ballooning degeneration) and fibrosis stage were quantified applying the criteria proposed by Kleiner et al.28
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cardiac Structure Evaluation via Multimodal Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-dimensional–directed M-mode echocardiography was performed as we have previously described.25 Histologic assessment for myocyte registration was performed with hematoxylin and eosin staining, and myocardial fibrosis was assessed with Masson’s trichrome staining, as we have previously described.25 Quantitative assessment of fibrosis was performed with Picrosirius Red staining, and images were assessed for area of the red signal as a fraction of total tissue area by Visiomorph software (Visiopharm). Transmission electron microscopy was performed in cardiac tissue as previously described.25
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!