The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti gapdh

Manufactured by Fujifilm
Sourced in United States, Japan

Anti-GAPDH is a laboratory reagent used to detect the presence and quantify the levels of the GAPDH protein in biological samples. GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) is a commonly used internal control or reference protein in various biochemical and molecular biology experiments. The Anti-GAPDH reagent contains antibodies that specifically bind to the GAPDH protein, allowing for its identification and measurement.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using anti gapdh

1

Comprehensive Antibody Inventory for Cell Organelle Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-HA antibody (#3F10) was purchased from Roche Diagnostics; anti-CERT (#ab72536) from Abcam; chicken antibody against VAP (Kumagai et al., 2014 (link)) anti-TGOLN2/TGN46 (#A304-434A) from Bethyl Laboratories; anti-TOMM20 (#WH0009804M1) from Sigma-Aldrich; anti-Lamp2 (#sc-18822) from Santa Cruz; anti-LBPA (#z-PLBPA) from Echelon Bioscience; anti-EEA1 (#610457) from BD Transduction Laboratories; anti-catalase (#D4P7B) and anti-Rab11a (#2413) from Cell Signaling Technology; anti-Hrs (#10390-1-AP) from Proteintech; anti-GFP (#04404-84) from Nacalai Tesque, and anti-GAPDH (016-25523) from Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation. 2-Bromohexadecanoic acid (2-BP, #M1177) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Lipid dye II (#LD02) was from Dojindo Laboratories. Lysenin was a gift from Dr. Sekizawa (Zenyaku Kogyo). GFP-lysenin was a gift from Dr. Kobayashi (Riken). [14C(U)]L-serine (156 mCi/mmol, #MC265) was from Moravec.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of ATF4 and eIF2α

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in the lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 100 mM NaF, 0.5% sodium pyrophosphate, 10% glycerol, and cOmplete protease inhibitor (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The total cell lysates were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to Immobilon-P PVDF membranes (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were incubated with anti-ATF4 (Santa Cruz, sc-390063, 1:000), anti-phosho-eIF2α (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA, 3298, 1:1000), anti-eIF2α (Cell Signaling Technologies, 5324, 1:1000), and anti-GAPDH (WAKO, 016-25523, 1:5000) antibodies. GAPDH was used as an internal control. After washing, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated mouse IgG (Cell Signaling Technologies, 7076, 1:5000) and rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Technologies, 7074, 1:5000). The immunoreactive bands were detected by ChemiDoc XRS+ (BioRad) using ImmunoStar LD (WAKO, 290-69904). The intensity of immunoreactive bands was quantified with the Image Lab software (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CMV Infection and Inflammatory Response Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One day after CMV infection with or without Y27632 or K115, the cells were collected in RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). They were then sonicated and centrifuged. Western blotting (WB) was performed as described previously.34 (link) The primary antibodies were as follows: anti-TNF-α (1:500; Abcam), anti-NF-κB (1:100; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-IL-10 (1:500; Abcam), Phospho-IκBα (Ser32/36) (5A5) antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-GAPDH (1:1000; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2000) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The bands were quantified using ImageJ 1.49 software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blotting Analysis of Neuroblastoma Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neuroblastoma cell lines were seeded in a 10-cm dish at a final density of 1.5×106 cells and allowed to attach overnight. The cells were then treated with DMSO or experimental compounds. After 48–72 h, cells were lysed in CHAPS lysis buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and 25 or 50 μg of total lysate were boiled for 5–10 min in CHAPS and sample buffer. Western blotting was performed using the following primary antibodies: anti-ALK (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Phospho-ALK (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Shc (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Phospho-Shc (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-PARP (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-cleaved Caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-GAPDH (Fuji Film-Wako Chemicals), and anti-Actin (Merck). Secondary antibodies used were as follows: HRP-linked anti-rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Technology) and HRP-linked anti-mouse IgG (Cell Signaling Technology). The proteins were visualized using ImageQuant LAS 4000mini with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Investigating KRAS and RAD51 Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KR12‐treated cells were lysed using RIPA buffer containing phosphatase and complete proteinase inhibitor. BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to determine protein concentration. Proteins were separated by SDS‐PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 60 min at room temperature and subjected to immunoblotting using the primary antibodies of anti‐KRAS (sc‐30; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti‐RAD51 (ab133534; abcam) and anti‐GAPDH (016–25,523; Wako). The results were quantified using the ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells lysed on ice in lysis buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 135 mM NaCl, 1% Triton-X 100, 10% glycerol] supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail, cOmplete mini (MilliporeSigma), were boiled in loading buffer and subjected to 5%–20% gradient SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (MilliporeSigma) and incubated with the anti-SARAS-CoV-2 S antibody (1:5,000 dilution; GeneTex), anti-N antibody (1:5,000 dilution; Sino Biological), or anti-GAPDH (1:5000 dilution; FUJIFILM Wako). The immune complexes were visualized with SuperSignal West Femto substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The signals were detected using a WSE-LuminoGraph I (ATTO) and ImageSaver6 (ATTO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of HA-Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression vectors of HA-tagged CPT1 or HA-tagged CEPT1 described previously were transfected into DKO cells using Lipofectamine 2000. After 24 h, the cells were lysed in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 0.2% Triton X-100 (w/v) and proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Proteins were separated with SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes (FluoroTrans; Pall Corp., Port Washington, NY) using a Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Transfer blotter (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), and then the membranes were incubated with 5% (w/v) skim milk in TBS for 1 h. The membranes were then incubated with anti-HA tag (Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-GAPDH (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) antibodies overnight at 4°C, washed three times with TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (w/v), and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgGs for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed three times with TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 and stained with Clarity Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's instructions and visualized using a ChemiDoc Touch imaging system (Bio-Rad). Protein density was quantified using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad). Results were normalized against the density of GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoblotting Analysis of Oxidative Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were harvested in a 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer. Lysates were then incubated at 95 °C for 5 min. The protein concentration of each lysate was examined using a DC Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Whole cell lysates (approximately 15 µg) were separated using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and separated proteins were then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Immobilon P; EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membrane was blocked for 1 h in 5% skimmed milk (Fujifilm-Wako, Osaka, Japan). Immunoblotting was conducted using anti-OSGIN1 (1:1000 dilution; 15248-1-AP, Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA), anti-NRF2 (1:1000 dilution; 16396-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:1000 dilution; 9661, Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), and anti-GAPDH (1:5000 dilution; 015-25473, Fujifilm-Wako). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000 dilution; 458, Medical & Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan) was used as the secondary antibody. Primary antibodies and secondary antibodies were diluted with Can Get Signal Immunoreaction Enhancer Solution 1 (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and Can Get Signal Immunoreaction Enhancer Solution 2 (Toyobo), respectively. Protein band images were acquired using a ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad) and analyzed using Image Lab Software (version 5.2.1, Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical) containing protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque). Equal amounts of protein were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After blocking, the blots were incubated with the following antibodies: anti‐p21Cip1/Waf1 (#2947; Cell Signaling Technology [CST]), anti‐p16Ink4a (SPC‐1280; StressMarq Biosciences), anti‐γH2AX(Ser139) (#9718; CST), anti‐Bcl‐2 (#658701; BioLegend), anti‐Bcl‐xL (#2764; CST), anti‐Mcl‐1 (#54535; CST), anti‐survivin (#71G4B7; CST), anti‐cFLIP (ALX‐804–428; Enzo Life Sciences), anti‐TATA‐binding protein (TBP; #22006‐I‐AP; Proteintech), anti‐PARP (#46D11; CST), anti‐caspase‐3 (#9668; CST), anti‐c‐Myc (1472–1; EPT), anti‐GAPDH (#015‐25473; Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical), and anti‐β‐actin (#622102; BioLegend). Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were prepared using the LysoPure™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kit (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical). After washing, membranes were incubated with goat anti‐rabbit or horse anti‐mouse horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibody (#7074 and #7076; CST). Protein bands were visualized using an Amersham ImageQuant™ 800 Biomolecular Imager (General Electric Company).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were resuspended in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 100 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland), and a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay was used to determine the protein concentration of each lysate; an aliquot of each lysate was then diluted with sample buffer (50 mM Tris, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 0.1% bromophenol blue, and 10% glycerol) to a final concentration of 1–2 μg/μL, and it was then analyzed by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and Western blotting using anti-PODXL (PAB20111), anti-SCGB1D2 (sc-48327), and anti-GAPDH (014-25524; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!