The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using cation h guard column

1

Quantification of Butyrate in Culture Supernatants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Butyrate in culture supernatants was quantified by HPLC coupled to a refracting index detector (RID) and diode array detector (DAD) on an Agilent HP 1100 system (Agilent). Standards of butyric acid (0.09–50 mM) were prepared in 5 mM H2SO4 for peak identification and quantification. Samples from four biological replicates were analysed by injecting 20 µL of standard or filtrated (0.45 µM filter) culture supernatant on a 7.8 × 300 mm Aminex HPX-87H column (Biorad) combined with a 4.6 × 30 mm Cation H guard column (Biorad). Elution of was performed with a constant flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1 and a mobile phase of 5 mM H2SO4. Standards were analysed as above in technical triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PHB Content Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PHB content of the bacterial cells was determined by a quantitative method that used HPLC analysis to measure the crotonic acid formed by acid-catalyzed depolymerization of PHB (Karr et al., 1983 (link)). Cell mass samples were freeze-dried before analysis. PHB-containing dried bacterial cells (15–50 mg) were then digested in 96% H2SO4 (1 mL) at 90°C for 1 h. The reaction vials were then cooled on ice, after which, ice-cold 0.01N H2SO4 (4 mL) was added followed by rapid mixing. The samples were further diluted 20- to 150-fold with 0.01N H2SO4 before analysis by HPLC.
The concentration of crotonic acid was measured at 210 nm using an HPLC equipped with a photodiode array detector (Agilent 1100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). A Rezex RFQ Fast Acids column (100 × 7.8 mm, 8 μm particle size, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) and Cation H+ guard column (BioRad Laboratories, CA) operated at 85°C were used to separate the crotonic acid present in the reaction solutions. The eluent was 0.01N H2SO4 at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Samples and crotonic acid standards were filtered through 0.45 μm pore size nylon membrane syringe filters (Pall Corp., NY) prior to injection onto the column. The HPLC was controlled and data were analyzed using Agilent ChemStation software (Rev.B.03.02).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of Fermentation Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were collected at the same time as COD analysis above, centrifuged to remove cells, then filtered and subjected to analysis by an Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC system and refractive index detector (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Analytes were separated using a Bio-Rad 300 × 7.8 mm Aminex HPX-87H column and Cation-H guard column (Bio-Rad, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) at 50 °C with 0.02 N H2SO4 mobile phase and 0.5 mL min−1 flow rate. Levels of acetate, ethanol, formate, glucose, glycerol, lactate, pyruvate, succinate, xylitol, xylose, cellobiose, and propanoic acid were quantified as g/L in each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Analysis of Sugars and Byproducts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of sugars and products were carried out by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC; Series 1100 Hewlett Packard/Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) with a refractive index detector. The mobile phase was 5 mM H2SO4, which was pumped at 0.6 mL/min through an Aminex HPX-87H column with a Cation H guard column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Samples were injected (2 to 5 μL) with the column maintained at 20°C to prevent hydrolysis of sucrose (54 (link)). One standard stock solution was made with (25 g/L) of each of the sugars (sucrose, glucose, and fructose). The other standard stock solutions contained succinic acid (10 g/L), acetic acid (7 g/L), lactic acid (11 g/L), and ethanol (15 g/L). Stock solutions were portioned out in glass vials and frozen. When used, vials were thawed and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 μL were injected onto the column to generate calibration curves. All peak-area-based calibrations were found to be linear, stable over time, and with excellent correlations (R2 > 0.99). The results were plotted in Excel and Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used in R to determine significant differences (P < 0.05) in measured sugars and by-products between samples at each time point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Sugars in Ethanol Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 2 mL aliquot of the 18 mL ethanol extractives supernatant derived from the AIR preparation protocol was dried down under nitrogen (N) gas in a Techne Sample Concentrator (Techne, Charleston, SC, USA). The extractives precipitate was resuspended in 200µL of Milli-Q® water (18.2 Ω), filtered through a 0.45 µm filter plate, and then loaded into the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system. The samples were run on an Agilent 1260 Infinity™ LC series system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with a Bio-Rad 300 × 7.8 mm Aminex 87 H column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and a Bio-Rad cation H guard column. The Agilent 1260 refractive index detector (RID) was held at 35 °C. The samples were run using an isocratic 4 mM sulphuric acid eluent at 0.6 mL/min−1 and 60 °C for 16 min. For the quantification of sucrose, glucose, and fructose, the conditions using a temperature of 18 °C and 10 mM sulphuric acid eluent at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min−1 for 22 min. The extractive precipitate sample volume was 3µL (at RT). A combined sucrose, fructose and glucose standard from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MI, USA) at concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 g/L was run as a signature reference, which displayed satisfactory accuracy of the HPLC instrument. For further details of the methods and instruments utilised, see [69 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Biomass Compositional Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The compositions of the pretreated and dioxane-extracted samples were measured using a modified version of the NREL standard method (NREL/TP-510-42618). Because only relatively small amounts of sample were available for compositional analysis, the analyses were performed on 100 mg samples instead of the standard of 300 mg. Sugars and sugar degradation products, i.e., furfural and hydroxymethyl furfural, were measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with refractive index and photodiode array detectors (Agilent 1100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). A Rezex RFQ Fast Acids column (100 × 7.8 mm, 8 μm particle size, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) and Cation H+ guard column (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) operated at 85°C were used to separate sugar monomers, total oligomers, and degradation products present in the reaction solutions. The eluent was 0.01N H2SO4 at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Samples and standards were filtered through 0.45 μm nylon membrane syringe filters (Pall Corp., East Hills, NY) prior to injection (2.5 μL) onto the column. The HPLC was controlled and data was analyzed using Agilent ChemStation software (Rev.B.03.02).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Metabolic Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
End-product analytes (glucose, ethanol, glycerol, lactate, and acetate) were measured with an analytical system consisting of an Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) with a quaternary pump, chilled (4 °C) autosampler, vacuum degasser, refractive index detector, and a Aminex HPX-87H column with a Cation-H guard column (BioRad, Inc. Hercules, CA; 300 × 7.8 mm, cat# 125–0140). Operating parameters were as follows: 0.02 N H2SO4 mobile phase, 0.500 mL/min flow rate, 50 °C column temperature, 50 °C detector temperature, 28 min run time, and a 50 μL injection volume. Instrument control, data collection and analysis/calculation are done using Chem Station V. B04.03 software (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). An unpaired t-test was performed to determine statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative HPLC Analysis of Oxalic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracts in the volumetric flasks were filtered through a cellulose acetate syringe filter with a pore size of 0.45 μm (dismic‐25cs, Advantec, CA, USA) into 1 ml glass vials. The samples were analyzed with a high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system, using a 300 mm × 7.8 mm Rezex ion exclusion column (Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) attached to a Cation‐H guard column (Bio‐Rad, Richmond, CA, USA) held at 25°C. Analysis was performed by injecting 20 μl of sample or standard onto the column using an aqueous solution of 25 mM sulfuric acid (HPLC grade Baker Chemicals, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA) as the mobile phase, pumped isocratically at 0.6 ml/min, with peaks detected at 210 nm. The HPLC equipment consisted of a Shimadzu LC‐10AD pump, CTO‐10A column oven, SPD‐10Avp UV–vis detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a Waters 717 plus auto‐sampler (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Data acquisition and processing were undertaken using a PeakSimple Chromatography Data System (model 203) and PeakSimple software version 4.37 (SRI Instruments, Torrance, CA, USA). The oxalic acid peak was identified by comparing the retention time to a standard solution, and by spiking an already‐filtered sample containing a known amount of oxalic acid standard. The insoluble oxalate content of each sample was calculated by difference between the total and the soluble oxalate contents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!