The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss ver 25.0 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS ver. 25.0 for Windows is a software application designed for statistical analysis. It provides tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. The software is capable of handling a wide range of data types and can perform various statistical techniques, including descriptive statistics, regressions, and advanced multivariate analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

12 protocols using spss ver 25.0 for windows

1

Factors Influencing Weight Gain Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis of baseline characteristics, the data were summarized as numbers and percentages. The chi-square test was used to compare general characteristics of the subjects. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between weight gain and psychological factors, exercise, and dietary patterns and evaluate the odds ratios (ORs) for measuring these associations. Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, household income, educational level, and lifestyle habits (including smoking and alcohol consumption). All data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
This study plan was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Kyung Hee University, and written consent was obtained from subject prior to commencement of the study (IRB approval no., 2019-03-048).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. The data were expressed as means±standard deviations, medians with interquartile ranges, or proportions. Comparisons of categorical and continuous variables were performed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test and the Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test, respectively. A p-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline characteristics are expressed as the median (interquartile range [IQR]) or number (%) as appropriate. The Mann-Whitney test or chi-squared test (Fisher’s exact test) was used to compare characteristics between two groups. In addition, the Cox proportional hazard model was used for uni- and multivariate analyses.
Cumulative probabilities of HCC development were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A value of P<0.05 was an indication of statistical significance. Multivariate analysis was performed using variables with a P-value of <0.1 in univariate analysis. Data was analyzed using the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) ver. 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Retrospective Survival Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). All continuous variables are presented as mean±standard deviation. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical variables. Cumulative survival rates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate prognosis analysis. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to analyze risk factors. Factors with p < 0.05 in univariate analyses were analyzed using multivariate analyses. p < 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analyzed with commercial software (SPSS® Ver. 25.0 for Windows; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and expressed as means ± standard errors. Single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical comparisons, while the post hoc comparisons were analyzed through a Tukey’s test to determine the differences between means with normal distribution, as well as variables that presented a normal distribution after log (x + 1) transformation. The variables that did not present a normal distribution after the logarithmic transformation were analyzed through the Student’s t-test, and the post hoc comparisons were made through the Wilcoxon test. Differences were considered statistically significant when the p-values were <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Predictive Scoring System for Bone Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The reliability of each data point for the YAM <80% value was calculated using discriminant analysis. For discriminant analysis, the cutoff points of the participants’ ages and BMIs were determined based on the mean scores for age and BMI to establish a predictive scoring system. Based on a mean age of 59 years and a mean BMI of 22.2 kg/m2, 60 years of age and a BMI of 22 kg/m2 were used as cutoff points. Variables with large weight coefficients were selected for our scoring system. Each selected variable was scored according to the value of the corresponding weight coefficient. For the discriminant analysis, a positive score was a prediction of YAM <80%. Thereafter, the prognostic results obtained with this scoring tool were examined, and a cutoff score was determined. Additionally, the determined cutoff score was examined for the prediction of YAM ≤70%, which is approximately less than −2.5 SDs of YAM. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Morphometric Differences in Lumbar Spine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS ver. 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Cohen’s effect size and power was calculated using G Power ver.3.1. We performed an independent t-test and Fisher’s exact test to analyze the differences in the demographic and radiologic differences. An independent t-test was used to investigate statistical relationships of total CSA, rCSA, FCSA, FCSA/total CSA (%), MF: ES ratio, and SMI between the two groups. These variables were entered into binary logistic regression analysis. To determine which variables were the most statistically appropriate independent predictors (largest area under the curve (AUC) area) of DLS, we performed five logistic regression analyses. We used DLS as the dependent variable and five sets of variables (MF FCSA/ES FCSA, SMI FCSA, ratio of FCSA to total CSA, FCSA, rFCSA) as the independent variables. BMI, age, disk height, facet arthropathy grade, disk degeneration grade were adjusted in each logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at p-values less than 0.05. All values were presented as mean ± standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tumor Stage and Histology vs. Metastasis Timing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The difference of time interval between primary tumor diagnosis and occurrence of CM according to tumor stage or histologic features was determined using Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Bonferroni method. Statistical significance was accepted for p-values < .05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Metabolic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Correlations between CRS and PET parameter were examined with the Mann-Whitney U test. The predictive performance regarding the identification of CRS 3 was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Associations between metabolic response and NAC parameters were examined with the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference of survival rates between metabolic responders and non-responders were compared by the log-rank test. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). All tests were two-sided and p-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparative Analysis of Kidney Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Baseline continuous variables were compared using the independent two sample t test or the Mann–Whitney rank sum test according to data distribution, while categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Differences in serial eGFR, SBP, DBP, and BPMS between the two groups were assessed by a linear mixed model using a specific subgroup and time as an independent variable. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!