The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using ab65856

1

Fungal Growth and Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wild-type (R21) and rodA(p)::mRFP::rodA strains (1 × 107 conidia) were grown 50 ml liquid minimal media plus 1 % fructose at 37 °C in a rotatory shaker (180 rpm) for 16 h. After, the mycelia were transferred to SEB media for 24, 72, and 120 h. The collected mycelia and SEB were immediately frozen and the proteins extracted as previously described. Culture supernatants (40 ml) were freeze dried and resuspended in extraction buffer. Protein content was measured using the Bio-Rad protein assay. Total proteins (20 µg) were separated on a Bolt® 4–12 % Bis–Tris Plus Gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane using the iBlot®2 dry blotting system (Life Technologies). Coomassie and ponceau stained gels revealed protein loading and correct transfer [62 ]. The primary anti-RFP (ABcam: AB65856) was used at a 1:1000 dilution in TBS-T (25 mM Tris, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05 % Tween-20, pH 7.5) overnight at 4 °C. Primary antibodies were detected using a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated second antibody (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories) at a 1:2000 dilution in TBS-T plus 5 % skimmed milk powder for 1 h, at room temperature. Chemiluminescence was detected using Super signal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The animals were perfused and processed for histological analysis as described previously.9 (link) Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously.10 (link) The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-pRPS6 (#2211, 1:400, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), goat anti-human GDNF (AF-212-NA, 1:1,000, R&D Systems Europe), rabbit anti-DHFR DD (1:20,000, a kind gift from the Wandless lab that has been used previously21 (link)), mouse anti-RFP (ab65856, 1:1,000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse anti-NeuN (MAB377, 1:1,000, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), rat anti-CD11B (MCA275R, 1:1,000, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Solna, Sweden), and mouse anti-CD8 alpha (ab33786, 1:1,000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The secondary antibodies used were as follows: biotinylated horse anti-mouse (BA2001, 1:200, Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK), biotinylated horse anti-goat (BA9500, 1:200, Vector Labs), and biotinylated goat anti-rabbit-biotin (BA1000, 1:200, Vector Labs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Co-Immunoprecipitation of FgRbp1 and FgU2AF23

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FgRbp1-GFP and FgU2AF23-RFP fusion constructs were generated as described in our previous section. Both constructs were verified by DNA sequencing and co-transformed into PH-1. Transformants expressing pairs of fusion constructs were confirmed by western blotting. In addition, the transformants bearing a single fusion construct were used as references. For Co-IP assays, total proteins were extracted and incubated with the GFP-Trap Agarose (ChromoTek, Martinsried, Germany) at 4 °C for 6 h with rotation. After six times of washing, proteins eluted from agarose were analyzed by western blot detection with anti-RFP (ab65856, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 1:10000 dilution) antibody. The input samples were also detected with monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody described in the previous section as a reference. To detect whether the interaction between FgRbp1 and FgU2AF23 depended on RNA, the cell lysate was treated with 500 μg/ml RNase A at room temperature for 30 min prior to immunoprecipitation56 (link). The experiment was repeated twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Derivation and Characterization of mESCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Joshua Brickmann (Copenhagen) provided the E14 Ju09 HV H2B‐Tomato mESCs (Morgani et al, 2013) and CAG H2B‐eGFP ESCs were derived from mice (Hadjantonakis & Papaioannou, 2004). These mESCs were maintained in mESC medium containing 2i/LIF/serum. Cells were passaged twice with 2iL on mouse embryonic fibroblasts and inactivated with no growth factor medium. Cells were then treated for 48 h with 2i/LIF/serum or 2i/Jaki/serum on mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Chimeric embryos were generated by morula aggregation. Clusters of 5 to 10 mESCs were aggregated with wild‐type CD1 morulae and cultured in potassium (K) simplex optimized medium (KSOM; Chemicon) under paraffin oil at 37°C and 5% CO2 until the late blastocyst stage (embryonic day 4.5). Blastocyst embryos were subjected to immunofluorescent staining using anti‐Cdx2 (1:600, Abcam ab76541), anti‐Gata4 (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotech sc‐9053), anti‐Sox2 (1:100, R&D Systems AF2018), anti‐GFP (1:400, Abcam ab13970), and anti‐RFP (1:100, Abcam ab65856) antibodies. Imaging was performed using a Quorum WaveFX spinning disk confocal system and Volocity acquisition software (Perkin Elmer). The frequency of cells localizing to extraembryonic—trophectoderm (TE) positions in the blastocyst was counted. The investigators were not blinded to allocation during outcome assessment, and the experiments were not randomized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Imaging Larval Development Using Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wandering third instar larvae were heat-fixed for 5 seconds at 70ºC, and mounted in one drop of 60% glycerol before being imaged on either a Leica TCS SP5 X or a Nikon C2 confocal microscope. Images are displayed as either single optical sections or z-stack projections. Image analysis was performed with Fiji. In The following primary antibodies were used for immunofluorescence: chicken 𝛼-GFP (1:1000, Invitrogen #A10262), mouse 𝛼-acetylated tubulin (1:1000, Sigma #T6793), mouse 𝛼-RFP (1:1000, Abcam #ab65856), and rabbit α-Wkdpep (1:1000, generously provided by Amin Ghabrial). Secondary antibodies utilized in this study include: goat 𝛼-chicken 488 (1:1000, Life Technologies #A-11039), donkey 𝛼-mouse 568
(1:1000, Life Technologies #A-10037 ), donkey 𝛼-rabbit 647 (1:1000, Life Technologies #A-31573).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Imaging Larval Development Using Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wandering third instar larvae were heat-fixed for 5 seconds at 70ºC, and mounted in one drop of 60% glycerol before being imaged on either a Leica TCS SP5 X or a Nikon C2 confocal microscope. Images are displayed as either single optical sections or z-stack projections. Image analysis was performed with Fiji. In The following primary antibodies were used for immunofluorescence: chicken 𝛼-GFP (1:1000, Invitrogen #A10262), mouse 𝛼-acetylated tubulin (1:1000, Sigma #T6793), mouse 𝛼-RFP (1:1000, Abcam #ab65856), and rabbit α-Wkdpep (1:1000, generously provided by Amin Ghabrial). Secondary antibodies utilized in this study include: goat 𝛼-chicken 488 (1:1000, Life Technologies #A-11039), donkey 𝛼-mouse 568
(1:1000, Life Technologies #A-10037 ), donkey 𝛼-rabbit 647 (1:1000, Life Technologies #A-31573).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!