The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using ab61213

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Leiomyoma Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed to evaluate the expression of TGFBR2 and IGF2BP1 in 16 leiomyoma tissues. Tissues were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin, and 3-μm-thick paraffin sections were obtained. IHC was performed using an automated immunohistochemical stainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The sections were deparaffinized and pretreated with a cell-conditioning solution (CC1, Ventana), followed by UV irradiation to abrogate the endogenous hydroperoxidase activity. The primary antibodies were diluted in Dako antibody diluent (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) with background-reducing components and used under the following dilutions: TGFBR2 (1:100, ab61213, Abcam, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and IGF2BP1 (1:100, ab82968, Abcam,). The sections were incubated with primary antibodies at room temperature for 32 min, and hybridized with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Ventana) for 8 min. The reaction was developed with diaminobenzidine (DAB; Dako) for 5 min and the slides were counterstained with hematoxylin II (Ventana) for 4 min and bluing reagent (Ventana) for 4 min. The sections were observed under light microscope (BX50, Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot for Fibrosis Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously.22 (link) Primary antibodies were anti‐IL‐22 (ab181007; Abcam), anti‐TGF‐β1 (ab92486; Abcam), anti‐α‐SMA (ab7818; Abcam), E‐cad (3195S; CST, USA), TGF‐βR2 (ab61213; Abcam), Vimentin (5741S), Smad2/3 (8685S) and P‐smad2/3 (8828S; CST), GADPH (14C10; CST), Vimentin (ab92547; Abcam), Fibronectin (FN) (610077; BD Systems, USA), Collagen‐I (ab34717; Abcam). Secondary antibodies were goat anti‐rabbit and rabbit anti‐mouse secondary antibodies (7076S and 7074S; CST).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Fibroblast Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary lung fibroblasts and HFL-1 cells were harvested and lysed in 1 mM PMSF (Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, USA) RIPA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) lysis buffer for 30 min at 4°C, then centrifuged at 15,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The BCA assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) was used to determine protein concentration of the lysates before 10% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. Separated protein samples were transferred onto PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and incubated with primary antibodies HYAL1 (ab 203293, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), TGFBR2 (ab61213, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), BMPR2 (14376-1-AP, ProteinTech, Chicago, USA), and SMAD1/5/9 (ab66737, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4°C for 2 h. The membrane was then washed and incubated with HRP-labeled secondary antibody (bs-40295G-HRP, Bioss, Beijing, China) and developed by an electrochemiluminescence solution (P0018S-2, Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Images were scanned using the Odyssey Imaging System (LI-COR Odyssey, USA) and analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical analysis of TGFBR2 and hTERT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed to examine TGFBR2 and hTERT expression in cervical tissues by using primary antibodies against TGFBR2 (1:100 dilution; ab61213, Abcam, USA) and hTERT (1:25 dilution; ab183105, Abcam, USA), according to the reported procedures45 (link). A semi-quantitative estimate was composed based on the staining intensity and the extent of stained cells; the evaluation criteria were as follows: intensity [categorized as 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining, light yellow), 2 (moderate staining, yellowish brown), or 3 (strong staining, brown)] and the percentage of positively stained cells [scored as 0 (0–5% positive), 1 (6–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%), or 4 (>75%)]. Finally, intensity was multiplied by the percentage of positively stained cells. The results were assessed independently by two investigators who were blinded to the patient’s clinicopathological outcomes. When the investigators originally proposed different results, they reached a consensus. The average result of the two independent investigators was the final reported staining score. Both scores of all the samples were clarified into four categories: 0–1 represented negative expression (−), 2–4 weak expression (+), 5–8 moderate expression (++), and ≥9 high expression (+++).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative IHC Analysis of TGFBR2, USP15, and SMAD3 in NSCLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC assay was performed and quantitatively analyzed as previously described [45 (link), 46 (link)]. Paraffin-embedded NSCLC serial sections were analyzed with antibodies against TGFBR2 (Abcam, ab61213), USP15 (Abcam, ab71713) and SMAD3 (Abcam, ab28379), respectively. The degree of immunostaining of target proteins was evaluated and scored based on the proportions of tumor cells stained positively and the intensity of the staining by two independent observers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Validating Antibody Specificity in TGF-β Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multiple lines of evidence were used to validate the commercially available antibodies used. For example, ablation of Tgfbr2 in cardiomyocytes decreased expression of TGF‐βr2 by western blots while abolishing cardiomyocyte staining with anti‐TGF‐βr2 antibody (ab61213 Rabbit mAb; Abcam, Cambridge, MA; Figure 1). Similarly phospho (p)‐Smad3 (small mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3; S423/425 [C52A9] Rabbit mAb #9520; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), p‐TAK1 (transforming growth factor beta–activated kinase 1; S412 #9339; Cell Signaling Technology), TAK1 (ab109526 Rabbit mAb; Abcam), and p‐p38 (Thr180‐Tyr182 Rabbit mAb #4092; Cell Signaling Technology) were validated by treating fibroblasts with TGF‐β (20 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and confirming that activation of the above proteins’ syntheses could be detected by the cognate antibodies in the appropriate sample (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Analysis of PCa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed and permeabilized with Perm/Wash Buffer (Cat. # 554723, BD Biosciences). Samples were blocked with Image-iT FX signal enhancer for 30 min and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with primary antibodies combined with reagents of Zenon Alexa Fluor 488 (green) or 555 (red) labeling kit (Invitrogen). To detect Ki-67 in PCa cells co-cultured with MC3T3-E1 cells in vitro, human Ki-67 (cat. # ab15580, Abcam) and HLA-ABC (Cat. # 311402, BioLegend) antibodies were used as primary antibodies. To detect Ki-67 in PCa cells in bone marrow sections, human Ki-67 (cat. # ab15580, Abcam) and pan cytokeratin (cat. # ab867364, Abcam) antibodies were used as the primary antibody. To detect human TGFBR2 and TGFBR3, human TGFBR2 (cat. # ab61213, Abcam) and human TGFBR3 (cat. # ab78421, Abcam) antibodies were used as the primary antibody. After washing with PBS, the slides were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen). Images were taken with Nikon A-1-B confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Experimental Protocol for Studying Neuroinflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL/6 mice (Shanghai Experimental Animal Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences) were bred and housed under specific pathogen‐free (SPF) conditions. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Use Committee of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The reagents were used in this study: anti‐GFAP antibody (Rabbit, ab7260, Abcam), anti‐GFAP antibody (Mouse, ab4648, Abcam), anti‐TRAP1 antibody (Rabbit, CL647‐10325, Proteintech), anti‐TGFβRII antibody (Rabbit, ab61213, Abcam), anti‐p‐Smad2/3 antibody (Rabbit, 8828, Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐Smad2/3 antibody (Rabbit, 3102, Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐Smad4 antibody (Rabbit, 9515, Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐NF‐κB p65 antibody (Rabbit, 8242, Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐CBP/P300 antibody (Rabbit, 4771s, Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐RNA Pol II antibody (Mouse, 17‐620, Sigma Aldrich), anti‐H3K27ac antibody (Rabbit, ab177178, Abcam), the secondary antibodies (Sigma Biotechnology), Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) amino acids 35–55 (MOG35–55 peptides, MEVGWYRSPFSRVVHLYRNGK) (China Peptides Co. Ltd), recombinant mouse IL‐17 (R&D Systems), and ELISA kits (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Geniposide Modulates TGF-β Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Geniposide (≥98% purity, as detected by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis) was purchased from Shanghai Winherb Medical Co. (Shanghai, China). TGF-β (T7039) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States). ISO was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. EX-527 was purchased from MedchemExpress (Sollentuna, Sweden). Antibodies against the following proteins were purchased from Abcam: TGF-β1 (ab66043), SIRT1 (ab110304), gp91 (ab80508), 4-hydroxynonenal (4HNE) (ab46545), thioredoxin2 (ab26320), α-SMA (ab5694), GRP78 (ab955), XBP-1 (ab37152), TGF beta Receptor I (ab31013), TGF beta Receptor II (ab61213), and acetyl-lysine (ab80178). Antibodies against the following proteins were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology: phosphorylated (P-)Smad3 (8769), total (T-)Smad3 (9513s), and GAPDH (2118). The antibodies against P-PERK (sc-32577) and T-PERK (sc13073) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The antibody against ATF6 (15794-1-AP) was purchased from Proteintech Group. The secondary antibodies used in this study were acquired from LI-COR Biosciences (used at 1:10,000 dilution). The GT VisionTM+Detection System/Mo&Rb reagent for immunohistochemistry was obtained from Gene Technology (Shanghai, China). The Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody for immunofluorescence was purchased from LI-COR Biosciences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histopathological Analysis of IPF Lung Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histopathological analysis was performed on formalin‐fixed lung biopsy tissues from patients with IPF and mice by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's trichrome staining. Primary antibodies were TGF‐β1 (ab92486) and TGF‐βR2 (ab61213; Abcam, USA). The pathological scores of alveolitis at 7 days and fibrosis at 21 days in BLM‐induced mice treatment were calculated based on the method as described previously.19 (link) The alveolitis and fibrosis scores were performed blindly by two senior pathologists independently.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!