The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sc 8005

Manufactured by Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Sourced in United States

The Sc-8005 is a piece of laboratory equipment manufactured by Santa Cruz Biotechnology. It is designed to perform a specific core function, but a detailed description cannot be provided while maintaining an unbiased and factual approach without extrapolation on its intended use.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using sc 8005

1

Molecular Markers and Inhibitors in Cancer Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The compounds tamoxifen, MKT-077, VER-155008, PU-H71 and HCQ were purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA). The compound S1g-2 was synthesized according to our previous report [17 (link)]. All the chemicals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to a concentration of 10 mM. To obtain the final concentration, stock solutions were diluted in culture medium. Primary antibodies against LC3 (sc-398822), p62 (sc-28359), β-actin (sc-8432), Bim (sc-374358) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). A monoclonal antibody raised against a synthetic peptide antigen corresponding to the C-terminal of ERα36 was purchased from Abmart, Inc. (M000803, Shanghai, China). A mouse monoclonal antibody raised against amino acids 2-185 mapping at the N-terminus of ERα66 was purchased from Santa Cruz (sc-8005). To detect both ERα36 and ERα66 on the same gel, a previously reported antibody that can recognize either of ERα36 and ERα66 [22 (link)] was used (H222, Research Diagnostic). Antibodies against PARP (ab32138), and Bag3 (ab47124) were purchased from Abcam plc (Cambridge, MA, UK). Antibodies against EGFR (#4267), and Hsp70 (#4873) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was prepared in NuPAGE Sample Buffer and Reducing Agent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using 10 μg (estrogen-related blots), 65 μg (V5 blot, T47D-ELF5-isoform 2-V5) or 25 μg (V5 blots, all other lines) per lane. Samples were separated on precast 15-well 4–12 % Bis-Tris (estrogen-related blots) or 10-well 10 % Bis-Tris (V5 blots) polyacrylamide gels (Life Technologies), transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane, blocked in 5 % skim milk, and incubated overnight at 4 °C in primary antibody. Secondary horseradish peroxidase–conjugated antibody was added 1:2000 in 5 % skim milk (anti-mouse, NA931V, anti-rabbit, NA934V; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK). Proteins were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence solution (Western Lightning Plus; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and x-ray film (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Primary antibodies used were anti-V5 (sc-58052, 1:500–1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-transducin-like enhancer of split 1 (anti-TLE1) (ab183742, 1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-ERα (sc-8005, 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Forkhead box A1 (anti-FOXA1) (sc-101058, 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-β-actin (AC-15, 1:20,000; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing ER-Alpha and Raptor Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MCF7 cells were plated on poly-l-lysine-coated cover slips (Fisher, Hampton, NH), while T47D, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 cells were plated on Geltrex®-coated cover slips (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Following treatment, the cells were fixed in 1% PFA for 10 min, washed twice with PBS, subsequently permeabilized in 0.3% NP-40/PBS for 10 min, and blocked in Image-iT FX signal enhancer solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 30 min. Cells were incubated with ERα (1:50 dilution, SC-8005 Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) and raptor (1:400, ab169506 Abcam, Cambridge, UK) primary antibodies in 1% BSA/PBS overnight at 4 °C. Cover slips were subsequently washed in PBS and incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse and Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:500 dilution, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Following 5-min incubation with DAPI, cover slips were mounted using an Image-iT® FX signal enhancer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and imaged using a Nikon fluorescent microscope under ×40 magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Probing ER-TRIM3 Interactions via Immunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoprecipitation was performed as described in a previous study [20 (link)]. MCF-7 total cell lysates were precleared with rabbit IgG for 2 h and subsequently immunoprecipitated with an anti-ER alpha antibody (SC8005, Santa Cruz, 1:200) overnight, while rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz, 1:200) was used as the negative control. The bound proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting with an anti-TRIM3 antibody (HAP043396, Sigma, 1:2000). For the overexpression experiment, HEK293 cells were transfected with 5 μg of GFP-TRIM3 (full-length or domain deletion mutants) and ER alpha plasmid (full-length or domain deletion mutants) in 10 cm dishes. Cell lysates were precleared with IgG and subsequently incubated with an anti-GFP (ab290, Abcam, 1:200) antibody, while rabbit IgG was used as the negative control. The bound proteins were analyzed by western blotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunocytochemical detection of ER subtypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare the cultures, 15 × 104 cells were seeded on a 96-well plate and incubated under standard conditions. Next day, the medium was exchanged for the experimental medium and the cells were incubated for 72 h. After the incubation time, the media were removed and wells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), washed three times with phosphate- buffered saline (PBS) and permabilizated in PBST (PBS-Tween 20) for 10 min. The wells were then blocked in 1% non- fat milk in PBST for 30 min and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against ERα (1:50, sc-8005, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), ERβ (1:50, sc-6820, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) in PBST. The following day, the plate was washed three times with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies: AlexaFluor® 594 rabbit anti-goat IgG and AlexaFluor® 594 goat anti-mouse IgG (1:100) in PBST for one hour. Following this, they were washed once again with PBS and stained with DAPI (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) before being washed two times with PBS and visualized at a FLoid Cell Imaging Station (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of p62/SQSTM1, LC3 (P0067 and L7543, Sigma-Aldrich), ERα, GFP (sc-8005 and sc-9996, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), pAkt, and Akt (9271S and 4691, respectively, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), and normalization versus β-actin (A5441, Sigma-Aldrich) were performed as described [21 (link)]. Bands were detected with the ChemiDoc XRS+ Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting analysis was performed as described previously. After separation using SDS‐PAGE then transfer to PVDF membranes, the target proteins were detected after incubating with primary antibodies for CDK1 (Abcam: ab18, 1:1000), E2F1 (Abcam: ab179445, 1:1000), phosphorylated Akt (CST: 9271, 1:1000), Akt (CST: 9272, 1:1000), phosphorylated ERK1/2 (Abcam: ab201015, 1:1000), ERK1/2 (Abcam: ab36991, 1:1000) and ERα (Santa Cruz: sc‐8005, 1:200). The membranes were then incubated with the corresponding secondary antibody at 37°C for 1 hour Finally, the immunoreactive bands were developed using SuperSignal West Femto Maximum sensitivity substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the images analysed using Quantity One Software (Bio‐Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein expression was analyzed as described (Wittmann, et al. 2007 (link)) using antibodies purchased from Sigma - A5441 (β-actin) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) - sc-6259 (cytokeratin 18), sc-20680 (lamin A), sc-5546 (α-tubulin) and sc-8005 (ESR1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterizing ERα-TEAD4 Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclear pellets were collected and lysed with NP-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.1% Triton X-100. 1 mM PMSF and 1x protease inhibitor were freshly added.). Sonication was performed for 3 minutes with Q800R sonicator (QSonica) at 4°C to improve lysis before centrifuging to collect nuclear lysate. The nuclear lysate was precleared using 10 μl Dynabeads Protein G (Life Technologies) and antibodies were added to lysate and incubated at 4°C overnight. The protein complex was collected using 20 μl Dynabeads Protein G and washed 6 times with NP-40 lysis buffer before elution with 2x SDS loading buffer. The antibodies used in Co-IP were: anti-ERα (sc-8005, Santa Cruz), anti-TEAD4 (sc-101184, Santa Cruz), anti-YAP1 (14074S, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-HA (ab9110, Abcam) and IgG (ab171870, Abcam).
To study the interaction between ERα and wildtype or DNA-binding domain mutant TEAD4, we used two established doxycycline-inducible stable cell lines expressing BLRP and Flag dual-tagged wildtype or mutant TEAD4 proteins (see the section of “Establishing stable cell lines expressing BLRP-Tagged TEAD4 and biotin ChIP”). The nuclear lysate was prepared and ERα protein complex was pulled down using ERα (sc-8005, Santa Cruz) antibody. The wildtype or mutant TEAD4 proteins were detected with anti-Flag antibody (F1804, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunoblotting Analysis of Liver Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins prepared from liver were separated on SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Immunoblotting was performed as previously described (Naville et al., 2013) . Primary antibodies included mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against Esr1 (dilution 1:1000; sc-8005; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Cliniscience, Nanterre, France) or α-tubulin (dilution 1:2000; T5168; Sigma-Aldrich). The secondary antibodies were anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-coquette, France). Blots were revealed using the Luminata Classico Western HRP substrate (Millipore, Molsheim, France) and detection was made using the ChemiDocXRS+imaging system (BioRad). Results were analyzed with Image Lab Software (BioRad). Data were normalized relatively to α -tubulin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!