The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using 500 ms lc ion trap mass spectrometer

1

Synthesis and Characterization of Pyrazole-Derived Metal Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5-methyl 3-pyrazole carbohydrazide was prepared according to a literature process [34] (link). 3-(hydroxyimino) butan-2-one, Co(NO3)2.6H2O and Ni(NO3)2.6H2O were purchased from Aldrich and used as received. Infrared spectra (4000–400 cm−1) were recorded on a Nicolet Impact 400D or a BIO-RAD FTS 3000 MX spectrophotometer instrument in KBr pellets; wave numbers are in cm−1; abbreviations: vs, very strong; s, strong; ms, medium strong; m, medium; br, broad. UV-Vis spectra were recorded in 10−4 M MeOH solutions of the complexes with a Perkin Elmer instrument (Lambda 35). 1H NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature on a Bruker Avance II 300 (Ultra Shield Magnet) spectrometer operating at 300.130 MHz. The chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm using tetramethyl silane as the internal reference. Electrospray mass spectra (ESI-MS) were run with an ion-trap instrument (Varian 500-MS LC Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer) equipped with an electrospray ion source. For electrospray ionization, the drying gas and flow rate were optimized according to the particular sample with 35 p.s.i. nebulizer pressure. Scanning was performed from m/z 50 to 1000 in CH3OH solution. The compounds were studied in both positive and negative modes (capillary voltage = 80–105 V). Other abbreviations used (NMR): s: singlet, T1: type-I binding mode as HL, T2: type-II binding mode as L2−.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Characterization of Phosphite Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solvents (POCh, Gliwice, Poland) were routinely distilled and dried prior to use. Amines, diphenyl phosphite, as well as pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde (Aldrich, Poznań, Poland), were used as received. Melting points were measured on a MelTemp II apparatus and were not corrected. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz operating at 600 MHz (1H NMR), 150 MHz (13C NMR), and 243 MHz (31P NMR) or on a Varian Gemini 2000 BB operating at 81 MHz (31P NMR). ESI-MS were recorded using a Varian 500-MS LC ion-trap mass spectrometer (Palo Alto, CA, USA). The ESI source was operated at 5.00 kV and a capillary heater was set to 350 °C. The cone voltage was set within the range of 50–150 V. Elemental analyses were carried out at the Laboratory of Microanalysis, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Łódź, Poland.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analytical Techniques for Chemical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents of analytical grade were used, and solvents were dried according to standard methods [26 ]. TLC was performed to monitor chemical reactions using aluminum plates coated with silica gel 60 F254 from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Column chromatographic separations were performed using silica gel 60A 70–200 µ from Carlo Erba Reagents. Melting points (M.P.) were measured using a Leica Galen III hot-stage microscope. The NMR spectra (1H and 13C) were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III-400 NMR spectrometer (at 400 and 100 MHz). Tetramethylsilane (TMS) was used as a standard internal reference to report the chemical shifts (δ). Abbreviations: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet, bs = broad singlet. Mass spectra (ESI-MS) were obtained on a 500 MS LC Ion Trap mass spectrometer (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with an ESI ion source, operated in the positive ion mode. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained on a Bruker Impact II quadrupole mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltoniks, Billerica, MA, USA). UV-Vis spectrophotometers were used: Perkin Elmer Lambda 35 (radical scavenging, cholinesterase inhibition) and Spectramax Plus 384 (cell assays). Fluorescence measurements were performed on a microplate reader, BMG Labtech, POLARstar OPTIMA, for evaluation of Aβ42 aggregation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Spectroscopic Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker Avance II + 300 (UltraShield Magnet) spectrometer operating at 300.130 and 75.468 MHz for proton and carbon-13, respectively. The chemical shifts are reported in ppm using tetramethylsilane as the internal reference. The infrared spectra (4000–400 cm−1) were recorded on a BIO-RAD FTS 3000MX instrument in KBr pellets. Carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen elemental analysis was carried out in a PerkinElmer 2400 analyzer. Electrospray mass spectra (ESI-MS) was performed with an ion-trap instrument (Varian 500-MS LC Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer) equipped with an electrospray ion source. For electrospray ionization, the drying gas and flow rate were optimized according to the particular sample with 35 p.s.i. nebulizer pressure. Scanning was performed from m/z 50 to 1000 in a methanol solution. The compounds were observed in the negative or positive mode (capillary voltage = 80–105 V).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis and Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents of analytical grade were acquired from Honeywell, Labchem, Sigma-Aldrich and Scharlab. Solvents were dried in consonance with standard methods [45 ]. TLC was performed to monitor chemical reactions using aluminium plates coated with silica gel 60 F254 obtained from Merck. Column chromatographic separations were performed with silica gel 60A 70–200 μ obtained from Carlo Erba Reagents. Melting points (M.P.s) were measured using a Leica Galen III hot stage microscope. NMR spectra (1H and 13C) were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III-300 NMR spectrometer (at 300 and 75 MHz). Standard internal reference of tetramethylsilane (TMS) was employed to report the chemical shifts (δ). The abbreviations used are as follows: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet. Mass spectra (ESI-MS) were captured with a 500 MS LC Ion Trap mass spectrometer (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with an ESI ion source, operated in the positive ion mode. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained on a Bruker Impact II quadrupole mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltoniks, Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis and Characterization of Compounds I and II

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synthesis of compound I and compound II was described in the previous paper [17 (link)] based on the article by Pijewska [42 ]. Both compounds were purified by crystallization from methanol. The structures of compound I and II were characterized using IR, 1H- and 13C-NMR, MS spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. All solvents used in the synthesis were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and were used without further purification. The infrared transmission spectra of the crystalline products were recorded using a Nexus Thermo Nicolet FT-IR spectrophotometer (Wien, Austria; Faculty of Chemistry, University of Lodz). The MS-ESI were measured at the University of Lodz Faculty of Chemistry on a 500–MS LC Ion Trap mass spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Elemental analyses were performed in the Faculty of Chemistry (University of Lodz) using a Vario Micro Cube (Langenselbold, Germany) by Elemental analyzer. 1H- (600 MHz) and 13C-NMR spectra (150 MHz) were recorded at the University of Lodz Faculty of Chemistry on a Bruker Avance III instrument (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). The samples of compound I and II were dissolved in deuterated DMSO. The chemical shifts are given in ppm, and the coupling constants in Hz. Melting points were determined on a B-540 Melting Point apparatus (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) in capillary mode, and they were uncorrected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!