The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

31 protocols using nano indenter g200

1

Evaluating Restorative Material Micro-Hardness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mechanical properties of the investigated restorative materials in terms of micro-hardness (H) were analyzed using Nanoindenter G200 equipment (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The samples were mounted and fixed on the Standard stage sample holder and the nanoindentations were carried out employing a triangular pyramid Berkovich diamond indenter with a 20 nm radius. The experiments were performed through Express Test to a Displacement method from the NanoSuit software Version 6.52 (Santa Rosa, CA, USA), accomplishing 400 indents at 50 µm from each other (to prevent interactions between indentations) and Poisson ratio of 0.4 for each sample. In order to minimize the surface effects, as well as to avoid specimen damages and substrate contribution, the displacement into the surface was set to 500 nm [17 (link)] and the calculated nano-hardness represents the averaged values over all valid indents performed for each sample. Both nano-hardness properties and conversion degree were measured from the top surface of the cured dental composites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nano-indentation of Periodontal Ligament

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The instrument used in this experiment is the Nano Indenter G200 nano-indentation instrument (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for indentation experiments. Before the experiment, the samples were taken out of the freezer and thawed in a water bath at 37 °C. In order to prevent the sample from moving during the experiment, the samples were placed in a fixed bottom column and bonded. In this experiment, a cylindrical indenter was selected, and the radius (R) of the indenter was 100 μm. The areas with PDL thickness greater than 0.2 mm were found under the microscope for experimenting, and five experiment points were selected for each region.
The schematic diagram of the nano-indentation mechanical experiment of the cylindrical indenter is shown in Figure 2. The loading rate of the experiment was set to 0.5 mN·s−1, the peak load was 3 mN, and the holding time was 200 s [32 (link)]. Then, unloading was performed. Finally, the obtained data were derived to obtain the load-indentation depth curves and the displacement-time curves. The displacement-time curves were divided by the PDL thickness to obtain the PDL strain-time curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanoindentation Characterization of Copper

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Indentation tests were performed using Agilent Nano Indenter G200, and the contacted area was calibrated on fused silica sample to a maximum depth of 350 nm before test on copper specimens. For each depth and load, at least 20 tests were performed to see if the results converged. CSM option was adoped to form a modulus/hardness-depth curve from a single test, with strain rate of 0.05 s−1, and 1.0 nm harmonic displacement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanoindentation of Duplex Stainless Steel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Commercial duplex stainless steel produced by Baoshan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China was used as the study object. A 20 × 20 × 8 mm duplex stainless steel sample with clear grain boundaries was obtained by hand grinding, mechanical polishing, and slight electrolytic etching in a 20% NaOH solution. Then, the sample was observed under an optical microscope. The nanoindentation tests were conducted on a Nano Indenter G200 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with the XP Berkovich indenter selected. The experimental temperature was 25 °C. Six unidirectional indentation experiments were performed on austenite and ferrite in the region away from the grain boundaries using a displacement-controlled mode with a peak displacement of 1500 nm and a thermal drift of 0.05 nm/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of SU-8 Microstructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were acquired by using a field emission SEM (JSM-7500F, JEOL), and the samples needed to be coated with a gold film (a thickness of ~3–5 nm) beforehand. The optical microscopy images were obtained using a Motic BA400 microscope equipped with a charge coupled device camera. The pH of the solutions was calibrated by using a precision pH meter PHS-25 (INESA) with a resolution of 0.01. The Young’s modulus of the SU-8 microstructures was measured by using an Agilent Nano Indenter G200 equipped with an XP-style actuator, and the continuous stiffness measurement method was adopted. The measurement was carried out using a Berkovich diamond tip at 30 °C with a relative humidity of 20%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Surface Characterization of Coated CoCrMo Alloy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology and topography of the material were observed by scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4800, Hitachi High Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, Agilent 5500 SPM, USA). After the coating, the samples of each group were mechanically polished again to remove the surface coating then ultrasonic shock cleaning was used. The composition changes of the CoCrMo alloy elements in each group then were detected by scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS). There were 3 samples in each group, and 3 points in each sample were taken to calculate the mean value for each element. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (VERTEX70 FT-IR-Spectrometer, Bruker Optics, Germany) with an attenuated total reflection accessory (ATR) was used to analyse the chemical composition of the modified surface. Hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity were measured with a contact angle meter (DSA 30, Kruss, Germany) by dropping 4 µL of ultrapure water onto each sample. There were 6 samples in each group, and 6 different measurement areas were selected for each sample. The mechanical characteristics of the coating surface were measured using a nanoindentation instrument (Agilent Nano Indenter G200, USA). There were 3 samples in each group and 3 data points were measured for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanomechanical Properties of Hybrid Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nanomechanical properties (Hardness (H), Stiffness (S) and Young's modulus (E)) of all electrospun crosslinked mono/bicomponent or GO-COOH decorated hybrid scaffolds were investigated using a Nanoindenter G200 instrument (Agilent Technologies, USA). The samples were fixed on the sample holder for the Standard stage and the indentations were performed using the Berkovich diamond tip with a 20 nm radius. The Express Test to a Displacement method from the NanoSuit software was used, performing for each sample 400 indents at 50 μm distance from each other and 500 nm displacement into the surface and the poisson ratio of 0.4. The results calculated for each nanomechanical parameter represent the averaged values over all valid indents performed for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nano-indentation of Periodontal Ligament

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The instrument used in this experiment is the Nano Indenter G200 nano-indentation instrument (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for indentation experiments. Before the experiment, the samples were taken out of the freezer and thawed in a water bath at 37 °C. In order to prevent the sample from moving during the experiment, the samples were placed in a fixed bottom column and bonded. In this experiment, a cylindrical indenter was selected, and the radius (R) of the indenter was 100 μm. The areas with PDL thickness greater than 0.2 mm were found under the microscope for experimenting, and five experiment points were selected for each region.
The schematic diagram of the nano-indentation mechanical experiment of the cylindrical indenter is shown in Figure 2. The loading rate of the experiment was set to 0.5 mN·s−1, the peak load was 3 mN, and the holding time was 200 s [32 (link)]. Then, unloading was performed. Finally, the obtained data were derived to obtain the load-indentation depth curves and the displacement-time curves. The displacement-time curves were divided by the PDL thickness to obtain the PDL strain-time curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nanoindentation Analysis of Stainless-Steel Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical properties of stainless-steel substrates with and without deposited TO films were studied by nanoindentation technique (NanoIndenter G200, Agilent Technologies, USA). Continuous stiffness measurements mode was used to determine elastic modulus and hardness of the TO-deposited porous films. The nanoindenter was equipped with a Berkovich three-sided diamond pyramid indenter with centerline-to-face angle of 65.3° and a 17.8 nm radius at the tip of the indenter. The nanoindentation was carried out using a constant indentation strain rate of 0.05 s−1, continuous stiffness measurements amplitude was 2 nm with a frequency of 75 Hz and indent depth of 300 nm. The device is equipped with an optical microscope. Series of 15–25 indents were made for each sample probe, to obtain a better statistics as well as to cover large surface area. Distance between every measured point was 100 μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nanoindentation of LiTaO3 Crystal Wafer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to nanoindentation, the Y-42° plane of a commercial LiTaO3 single crystal wafer was carefully polished to a mirror surface. The surface morphology was detected by optical profiler (Newview 800, Zygo, Middlefield, CT, USA), as exhibited in Figure 1. Surface defects like tiny scratches or embedment of abrasives could not be observed on the polished surface. In addition, the surface roughness was about 1.1 nm on the area of 0.832 × 0.832 mm2. Nanoindentation load-holding tests were performed on Agilent Nano Indenter G200 (USA) at an ambient temperature of 23 °C by air conditioning. All the mechanical measurements were compliant with ISO 14577. The effective spherical tip radius was estimated by calibrating the standard fused silica. The loading rate and holding time were fixed to 2 mN/s and 500 s, respectively. The peak loads ranged from 1 to 20 mN for 0.76 μm tip, 2.5 to 50 mN for 2.95 μm tip and 25 to 450 mN for 9.8 μm tips, respectively. To minimize the thermal drift influence, all the holding tests were carried out until thermal drift decreased to 0.03 nm/s. Meanwhile, drift correction which was calibrated at 10% of the maximum load during the unloading process, was strictly performed. To ensure the reliability of the creep results, more than eighteen nanoindentation measurements were conducted for each test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!