The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using danofloxacin

1

Development of Fluoroquinolone Immunoassays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the chemicals used in this investigation were of analytical grade. Danofloxacin (DAN), ofloxacin (OFL), levofloxacin (LEV), garenoxacin (GAR), pefloxacin (PEF), gatifloxacin (GAT), clinafloxacin (CLI), sarafloxacin (SAR), lomefloxacin (LOM), tosufloxacin (TOZ), sparfloxacin (SPA), difloxacin (DIF), pazufloxacin (PAZ), marbofloxacin (MAR), moxifloxacin (MOX), rufloxacin (RUF), norfloxacin (NOR), ciprofloxacin (CIP), enrofloxacin (ENR), pipemidic acid (PIP), nalidixic acid (NAL), oxolinic acid (OXO), orbifloxacin (ORB), enoxacin (ENO), nadifloxacin (NAD), flumequine (FLU), bovine serum albumin (BSA), ovalbumine (OVA), casein, 1-ethyl-3-(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), ethylenediamine hydrochloride, triethylamine, sodium borohydride, glutardialdehyde, 4-aminomethylfluorescein (4-AMF), 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and Tween-20 were Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) products. Complete and incomplete Freund’s adjuvants were produced by Becton Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit immunoglobulins were from the Gamaleya Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology (Moscow, Russia). All other chemicals (salts and solvents of analytical grade) were from Khimmed (Moscow, Russia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Veterinary Drug Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solvents (HPLC/analytical grade) were purchased from Fluka (Sigma- Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) crystals and the reagents to prepare an EDTA-McIlvaine buffer solution, pH 4 (disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate, citric acid monohydrate and EDTA) were purchased from Fluka.
Formic acid (98–100%) was obtained from Riedel-de Haën (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
The extraction cartridges (Oasis HLB 3 mL, 60 mg) were provided by Waters (Milford, MA, USA).Amoxicillin, ampicillin, benzylpenicillin, cefalexin, cefquinome, ceftiofur, chloramphenicol, chlortetracycline, ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, dimetridazole, doxycycline, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, florfenicol amine, flumequine, furaltadone, furazolidone, lincomycin, lomefloxacin hydrochloride, marbofloxacin, nalidixic acid, nitrofurazone, oxolinic acid, oxytetracycline, ronidazole, spyramicin, sulphadiazine, sulphadimethoxine, sulphadimidine, sulphamerazine, sulphathiazole, tetracycline hydrochloride, thiamphenicol, tilmicosine, tinidazole, trimethoprim, tylosin, and enrofloxacin d5 as the internal standards (IS) (purity >98%) were used and purchased from Fluka (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Antibiotics and Pesticides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotics and pesticide residues were analyzed using analytic grade reagents. Standards of high purity grades (>99%) for 26 antibiotics belonging to four families: Sulfonamides (sulfacetamide, sulfisomidine, SMT, sulfapyridine, sulfamerazine, sulfameter, sulfachloropyridazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfabenzamide, sulfadimethoxine, sulfaquinoxaline, sulfamethoxypyridazine, and sulfadoxine), quinolones (nalidixic acid, oxolinic acid, CIP, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, lomefloxacin, and sarafloxacin), tetracyclines (tetracycline and oxytetracycline), and β-lactams (ampicillin) in addition to a hundred pesticide standards were procured from Sigma-Aldrich. Each pesticide stock solution was accurately prepared in acetonitrile at a concentration of 1 g/L. The working standards were freshly prepared by diluting the stock solution in acetonitrile to the desired concentration. Both stock and working solutions were stored at −20°C.
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water, HPLC-grade acetonitrile, disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate dihydrate (Na2 EDTA), and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) were also supplied by Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synthesis and Characterization of Fluoroquinolone Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemicals reagents used for this study were of analytical grade, and Ultra-pure water (Direct-Q® 3UV-R purifier system Millipore, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used throughout the duration of the experiments. Danofloxacin (99.7%) (DANO), enrofloxacin (99.0%) (ENRO), levofloxacin (99%) (LEVO), HPLC grade ethanol, methanol and acetonitrile were used, along with acetic acid, sodium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, ferrous chloride, ferric chloride, starch, chitosan, β-cyclodextrin and ortho-phosphoric acid purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Loius, MO, USA). A synthetic sample mixture of the fluoroquinolones (FQs) stock solution was prepared by dissolving appropriate amounts of DANO, ENRO and LEVO in small amounts of methanol. The mixture was then diluted with ultra-pure water to a final volume of 100 mL. The solution were stored in to refrigerator at 4–8 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Analytical Standards Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following solvents, reagents, and antimicrobial agent analytical standards were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany):

Methanol and n-hexane (hypergrade for LC-MS LiChrosolv®);

Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) crystals, disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate, citric acid monohydrate, and EDTA (for preparing EDTA-McIlvaine buffer solution, pH 4);

Ampicillin, penicillin G, cloxacillin, amoxicillin, penicillin V, oxacillin, dicloxacillin, nafcillin, enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, marbofloxacin, flumequine, tetracycline, 4-epitetracycline, oxytetracycline, 4-epioxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, 4-epichloretracycline, doxycycline, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfadimethoxine, sulfadimidine, and enrofloxacin d5 as the internal standards (IS).

Formic acid (98–100%) was provided from Riedel-de Haën (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
Water was purified using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
The Oasis HLB cartridges (3 mL, 60 mg) were supplied by Waters (Milford, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Simultaneous Determination of Antibiotic Families

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents were of analytical grade. Antibiotic standards of 4 different families, sulfonamides (sulfacetamide, sulfapyridine, sulfamerazine, sulfamethazine, sulfadimidine, sulfameter; sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfachloropyridazine, sulfadimethoxine, sulfadoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfabenzamide, and sulfaquinoxaline), quinolones (nalidixic acid, oxolinic acid, ciprofloxacin, and norfloxacin, ofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, lomefloxacin, and sarafloxacin), tetracyclines (tetracycline, oxytetracycline, and doxycycline), and beta-lactam antibiotics (amoxicillin, ampicillin, cloxacillin, and penicillin G), were purchased from (Sigma-Aldrich, St louis, MO, United States). All the standards were of high purity grades (>99%). Individual stock solutions were prepared at 1 g/L in acetonitrile and stored at −18 °C.
The working standard solutions containing all analytes except the lactams group with variable concentrations, according to their MRLs, was prepared as dilution of the stock solution in water /acetonitrile ratio of 70:30 (v/v), and the working standard solutions were kept at −20 °C in brown glass and were used for 1 week.
HPLC-grade water, HPLC-grade acetonitrile, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA; 0.2%), disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate dihydrate (Na2EDTA), and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) were also supplied by Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following reagents were of analytical standard grade and Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA) supplied: danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, sarafloxacin, bovine serum albumin (BSA), pepsin, α-chymotrypsin and trypsin. SDS (Pepyn, France) supplied methanol (MeOH) and acetonitrile (MeCN) (HPLC grade). PanReac® (Barcelona, Spain) supplied 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine, potassium phosphate, sodium azide, hydrochloric acid, sodium bicarbonate and calcium chloride. Sodium hydroxide, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, 2-mercaptoethanol, Coomassie blue-brillant G250 and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (99.5%) were purchased from Merck® (Darmstadt, Germany). Proteomic or molecular biology grade reagents: sodium dodecyl sulfate, Tris Base and Glycerol were supplied from Amresco® (West Chester, PA, USA). Orthophosphoric acid, molecular weight marker Spectra Multicolor Broad Range, Rabbit anti-DNP monoclonal and goat anti-Rabbit HRP antibodies were purchased from Scharlab (Barcelona, Spain), Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), Invitrogen (Carlsbad, MA, USA) and Bioss Inc. (Woburn, MA, USA), respectively. Water was purified with a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Antibiotic Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the antibiotics used in this study, i.e. danofloxacin, difloxacin, sarafloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, moxifloxacin, enrofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Dermatophilus congolensis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility testing was performed using the broth microdilution method with Mueller Hinton II broth (REMEL, LEXENA, KS) according to the CLSI guidelines (CLSI VET01 and CLSI VET08) [12 ,13 ]. Broths were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 72 h. The control strains were Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 as well as the reference strain D. congolensis ATCC 14637. All isolates were tested in duplicate with the higher concentration taken as the final in cases when variations occurred. Concentrations tested ranged between 0.125 µg/mL and 64 µg/mL for all antimicrobials. Susceptibility was tested against chlortetracycline, ampicillin, florfenicol, tetracycline, sulfadimethoxine, tylosin, novobiocin, neomycin, amoxicillin, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, ceftiofur, bacitracin, trimethoprim, penicillin and tulathromycin A (all acquired from SIGMA-ALDRICH, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Differentiation between susceptibility and resistance was performed according to the epidemiological cut off (ECOFF) criteria, or otherwise named the microbiological criterium, using visual estimation (“eye-ball” method) [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiplex Analysis of Veterinary Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard chemicals, namely, danofloxacin, erythromycin, sulfadimidine, benzylpenicillin potassium, chloramphenicol, lincomycin, tetracycline, spectinomycin, thiamphenicol, dexamethasone, kanamycin, melamine, trimethoprim, zearanol, aflatoxin M1, flunixin meglumine, and florfenicol, were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). All the chemicals used were of analytical grade. Lead acetate, potassium oxalate, disodium hydrogen phosphate, trichloroacetic acid, sodium hydroxide, and dichloromethane were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (China). High-purity water was obtained from a Milli-Q water system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Pure milk was purchased from a local supermarket. Commercialized semiquantitative ICA strip and an ICA strip reader were supplied by Beijing Meizheng Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!