The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nucleic acid detection kit

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States, Germany

The Nucleic Acid Detection Kit is a laboratory equipment product designed for the detection and analysis of nucleic acids, such as DNA and RNA. The core function of this kit is to provide the necessary reagents and tools for the amplification and identification of targeted genetic sequences. The kit includes essential components required for the nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and detection processes, allowing researchers and clinicians to accurately analyze the presence and characteristics of specific genetic materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using nucleic acid detection kit

1

In Situ Hybridization for Tlr8 mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cRNA probes for Tlr8 were synthesized in the presence of digoxigenin (DIG)-labelled UTP using a DIG RNA Labelling Kit in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The primer pairs for each probe are shown in Table 3 (product size: 758 bp). Cryosections (6 μm) were treated with acetylation solution and digested with proteinase K. The sections were incubated with a prehybridization solution and then with a hybridization buffer containing 50% formamide, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 200 mg/mL RNA, 1× Denhardt's solution (0.02% bovine serum albumin, 0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone, and 0.02% Ficoll PM400; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10% dextran sulphate, 600 mM NaCl, 0.25% SDS, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), and a sense or antisense RNA probe (final concentration, 0.2 μg/mL) for 24 h at 58°C. After washes in saline sodium citrate buffer, the sections were then incubated with 0.2% polyclonal sheep anti-digoxigenin Fab fragments conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (1: 400; Nucleic Acid Detection Kit, Roche Diagnostics) for 24 h at room temperature. The signal was detected by incubating the sections with a colour substrate solution (Roche Diagnostics) containing nitro blue tetrazolium/X-phosphate in a solution composed of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.5), 100 mM NaCl, and 50 mM MgCl2 in a dark room overnight at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cellular Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DMEM/Ham's nutrient mixture F-12, diethylstilbestrol (DES), atRA, and H-89 dihydrochloride hydrate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Gentamicin sulfate and fungizone were purchased from Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The RNA labeling kit and nucleic acid detection kit were purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive RNA Extraction and Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell RNA and mitochondrial RNA were extracted using the TRIzol® method followed by column purification (Direct-zol™ RNA MiniPrep; Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). mRNA was further purified by polyA selection using a Dynabeads® mRNA Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). The RNA concentration and purity were checked using a NanoDrop™ (Thermo Scientific) and agarose gel electrophoresis. Then, 130 ng of each RNA sample was separated on a 10% precast polyacrylamide tris-borate-EDTA(TBE)-urea gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and transferred onto a positively charged nylon transfer membrane (Ambion®; Life Technologies). The blot was hybridized with 200 ng/mL digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled SHLP6 RNA probe in Easy Hyb™ hybridization buffer (Roche) for 16 h at 60°C. After two stringent washes in 2× SSC (saline sodium citrate buffer) (1× SSC contains 0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M sodium citrate)-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for 5 min at room temperature and 0.2× SSC-0.1% SDS for 15 min at 60°C, the membrane was incubated for 30 min at room temperature with an anti-DIG antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Roche). Subsequent visualization was achieved using the BCIP-NBT substrate as instructed using a nucleic acid detection kit (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Screening for Antibiotic Resistance Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study isolates were screened for the genes encoding AmpC β-lactamases (AQU-1, MOX-like, and CepH β-lactamases) and CphA (MBL) by a colony hybridization assay with digoxigenin-labeled probes (DIG DNA Labeling kit and Nucleic Acid Detection Kit, Roche, Germany). The probe for detection of blaAQU-1 consisted of blaAQU-1 amplified from A. dhakensis AAK1with the primers AQU-2F and AQU-2R [21 (link)]. The probe for blaMOX-like genes consisted of a gene sequence 98.0% identical to A. caviae blaMOX-6 (GenBank accession no. GQ152601) amplified from a blood isolate with the primers AcMOX-F and AcMOX-R. The probe for blaCepH-like genes consisted of a gene sequence 95.5% identical to A. hydrophila blaCepH (GenBank accession no. CP000462) amplified from a blood isolate with the primers CepH-F11 and CepH-R1129. The probe for blaCphA was previously described [22 (link)]. The DNA sequences of the primers used in this study are summarized in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis and Characterization of VGLUT2 Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The VGLUT2 probes used in this study were digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes obtained by in vitro transcription of a rat VGLUT2 cDNA (Gift from Dr S. El Mestikawy). This cDNA (539 bp) was inserted into the pCR-TOPO-II vector (Invitrogen) for in vitro transcription. The transcription was carried out with the nonradioactive RNA labeling kit (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France). The recombinant plasmid containing the VGLUT2 cDNA insert was linearized with Xho I and transcribed with Sp6 RNA polymerase to obtain the antisense probe or linearized with Hind III and transcribed with T7 to obtain the sense probe. The labeling efficiency of the digoxigenin-labeled probes for VGLUT2 mRNA was determined each time by direct immunological detection on dot blots with a nucleic acid detection kit (Roche Diagnostics). The intensity of the signal for each probe was compared with a serial dilution of digoxigenin-labeled control RNA of known concentration. Only antisense and sense VGLUT2 probes with comparable signal intensity (comparable labeling efficiency), as determined in dot blots, were used for in situ hybridization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!