The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using gata3 d13c9

1

Endothelial Cell Signaling Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise specified. Antibodies against Tie2 (C-20) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), Tie2 (clone Ab33) (Merck Millipore), GATA3 (D13C9) (Cell Signaling), MMP14/MT1-MMP (D1E4) (Cell Signaling), pAKT (Ser473, D9E) (Cell Signaling), AKT (11E7) (Cell Signaling) and ubiquitin (Cell Signaling) β-tubulin and GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) were used. Soluble Tie2 levels were determined using the human Tie-2 DuoSet ELISA and the mouse Tie-2 Quantikine Kit. HUVECs were stimulated with TNFα, Angpt-1 and Angpt-2 (all from R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot, qRT-PCR, and Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was carried out as previously described 7 (link), 15 (link), 20 (link), 51 (link). Primary antibodies used are as follows: BRCA1, HSP90, GAPDH (Ambion), E-Cad, Vim, GATA3 (D13C9), (Cell Signaling), TWIST (Abcam). For qRT-PCR, total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol and cDNA was generated using the Omniscript RT Kit (Qiagen). qRT-PCR was performed as previously reported 7 (link). For surface marker analysis, tumor cells were isolated and stained. After exclusion of lymphocytes, dead cells, and Lin+ cells, the expression profile for CD24 and CD29 was determined by flow cytometry as previously described 15 (link), 20 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay for Activated T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assay was performed as described (20 (link)). In brief, activated Th cells were cross-linked for 10 min with 1% formaldehyde and lysed by sonication. After pre-clearing with salmon sperm DNA, bovine serum albumin, and Protein Agarose bead slurry (50%), cell extracts were incubated with rabbit polyclonal Etv5 (H-100), p300 (N-15), E4BP4 (V-19 or C-18), IRF4 (M-17) (all from Santa Cruz), GATA3 (D13C9) (Cell signaling), H3K14ac, H3K4me3, or normal rabbit IgG (all from Millipore) overnight at 4°C. The immunocomplexes were precipitated with Protein Agarose beads at 4°C for 1 hour, washed, eluted and cross-links reversed at 65°C overnight. DNA was purified, resuspended in H2O and analyzed by qRT-PCR. The percentage input was calculated by subtracting the amount of immunoprecipitated DNA from the IgG control from the amount of immunoprecipated DNA from the specific antibody and normalized against the amount of input DNA. ChIP primers were used as described (21 (link))
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Breast Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue microarrays (1.0 mm cores, 4 μm sections) were analyzed with antibodies against CCNB1 (Y106, Epitomics), EGFR (3C6, Ventana), FOXA1 (2F83, Abcam), FOXM1 (C-20, Santa Cruz), GATA3 (D13C9, Cell Signaling), phospho-HISTH3 (Ser10) (#9701, Cell signaling), KRT5 (EP1601Y, Thermo Scientific), LAMA5 (4C7, Dako), PLK1 (208G4, Cell signaling), PPARG (C26H12 Cell Signaling), RXRA (F-1, Santa Cruz), STAT3 (124H6, Cell signaling), phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705) (D3A7, Cell signaling). Cores were evaluated as blinded digitalized image files. For quantitatively staining markers (EGFR, FOXA1, GATA3, KRT5, PPARG, RXRA, STAT3) a tumor cell score (TCS) was defined as described in Sjödahl et al. [4 (link)]. For discrete cellular labeling (CCNB1, FOXM1, PLK1, p-STAT3), fractions of positive tumor cells was recorded. The mean tumor cell score of core pairs from the same sample was calculated. The number of cores evaluated for each marker ranged from 480 to 524. Mitotic figures were identified by the phospho-HISTH3 (Ser10) antibody and basal lamina by anti-Laminin α-5 staining. When possible, lines were drawn through the plane of the mitotic figure (in the direction of the cell division), and tangentially along the nearest basal lamina (Photoshop CS5 version 12.1), and the distance, in cell layers, to the basal membrane recorded. A total of 416 mitoses from 112 different tumors were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of GATA3 and RUNX3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer containing PMSF and protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 30 minutes on ice. Proteins were separated on denaturing 4%–15% SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad), transferred onto PVDF membrane (MilliporeSigma), and probed with Abs to GATA3 (D13C9), RUNX3 (D6E2), and β-actin (13E5, Cell Signaling Technology). Membranes were developed using HRP-conjugated secondary Abs and Pierce ECL Western blotting substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Microscopy of GATA3 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence microscopy, cells were plated onto coverslips (VWR) in a 24-well plate. Next day, cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and fixed with 4% PFA +0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 minutes on ice. Cells were permeabilised with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 minutes and blocked with 10% FCS +0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 hour with three washes between individual steps. Primary (GATA3 D13C9, Cell Signaling #5852, 1:100) and secondary (AlexaFluor 546 goat anti-rabbit, Invitrogen, 1:500) antibodies were diluted in blocking solution and incubated for 1 hour at RT. Finally, cells were stained with DAPI (10μg/ml, Sigma) for 10 minutes at RT in the dark. Slides were mounted in 85% glycerol and images were acquired on a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Key Regulators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell lysates were obtained using 8 M urea lysis buffer (8 M urea, 1% SDS, 0.125 M Tris, pH 6.8). Protein extracts (15 μg) were resolved on SDS–PAGE gels and immunoblotted using the following antibodies: GATA3 (D13C9; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), FOXA1 (ab23738; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), ERα (sc-543; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and actin (ab8226; Abcam). Signal intensity was analyzed using rectangular volume tool in Quantity One Analysis Software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with global background subtraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemistry of TERT, TBX21, and GATA3 in PTCL-NOS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining of TERT was performed using rabbit monoclonal to telomerase reverse transcriptase antibody (Y182) (Abcam). This monoclonal antibody was prepared using a synthetic peptide of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase aa1100‐1200 (C‐terminal) as an immunogen. The conditions for immunostaining were performed as follows. Antigen retrieval was performed by heat mediation at 95°C for 20 min using a microwave. Samples were incubated with primary antibody (1/100) for 30 min. An undiluted HRP‐conjugated goat anti‐rabbit IgG polyclonal was used as the secondary antibody. Tumor cells with more than 30% staining were considered positive in the current study. Immunohistochemical investigation of TBX21 (4B10; Abcam) and GATA3 (D13C9; Cell Signaling Technology) was performed for PTCL‐NOS. Tumor cells with more than 30% staining were considered positive as in our previous study.24
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!