The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using rabbit anti hif 1α polyclonal antibody

1

Immunohistochemistry and Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting, a rat anti-mouse CD9 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (clone KMC8) and mouse anti-human CD9 mAb (clone ALB6) were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA), and a mouse anti-mouse vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mAb (clone RM0009-2G02) was purchased from Abcam. For immunohistochemistry, rat anti-integrin α6 and β1, and CD98 mAbs (clones GoH3, KMI6, and H202-141, respectively) were purchased from BD Biosciences, a rat anti-E-cadherin mAb (clone DECMA-1) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and a rabbit anti-HIF-1α polyclonal antibody was purchased from Novus Biologicals. Secondary antibodies for immunohistochemistry were Alexa Fluor 488- and 546-conjugated IgGs purchased from Molecular Probes. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) were used for immunoblotting. Nuclei were counterstained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (WAKO Pure Chemical Industries).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spinal Cord Immunohistochemistry in ALS Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed frozen sections of spinal cord from mSOD1G93A mice (10 μm thick) were prepared as previously described32 (link). Hypoxia-induced factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) expression was evaluated in paraffin-embedded 6-μm–thick sections of the lumbar cord from ALS patients and 10 μm–thick fixed frozen sections of spinal cord of mSOD1G93A mice as previously described41 (link). The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti–HIF-1α polyclonal antibody (1:100; Novus Biologicals), rabbit anti–Iba1 polyclonal antibody (1:1000, Wako) and Alexa Fluor 488®–conjugated mouse anti–glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) monoclonal antibody (1:200; Cell Signaling Technology). The following secondary antibodies were used: AlexaFlour488-conjugated goat anti–rabbit IgG antibody (1:500, Invitrogen) and goat anti–rabbit immunoglobulins conjugated to peroxidase-labeled dextran polymer (Dako Envision+, Dako). For HIF-1α staining, reaction products were visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Vector Laboratories). The relative optical densities of HIF-1α immunoreactivity were quantified using ImageJ. The fluorescently labeled sections were examined using an LSM 510 confocal microscope (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described42 . Samples were lysed with NP-40 buffer [PBS, 01% TritonX, 05% sodium deoxycholate, 01% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 50 mM Trix-HCl and 150 mM NaCl, pH 80] containing protease inhibitors (20 mg/ml aprotinin and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), 2-mercaptoethanol and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate. Equal concentrations of protein were resolved on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and then transferred onto Poly-vinylidene Difluoride (PVDF) membranes (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan). The blots were incubated at 4 °C overnight with one of the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-HIF-1α polyclonal antibody (1:500; Novus Biologicals), rabbit anti–HPRT monoclonal antibody (1:2000; abcam), rabbit anti-BDNF monoclonal antibody (1:500; abcam), mouse anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (1:10000; Sigma-Aldrich). The blots were subsequently incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibodies for 90 min and visualized using SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The image of each band was captured and analyzed using Image Gauge (Fuji Film, Japan) and ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!