The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Progres c10plus camera

Manufactured by Jenoptik
Sourced in Germany

The ProgRes C10plus is a digital camera designed for microscopy applications. It features a high-resolution sensor and delivers high-quality images for various research and analysis purposes. The camera's core function is to capture and record microscopic images with precision and accuracy.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using progres c10plus camera

1

Hair Sample Microscopic Observation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hair samples were cleared in xylene, mounted with synthetic resin (Eukitt; Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo), and observed under a Leitz (Wetzlar, Germany) light microscope equipped with a ProgRes C10plus camera and dedicated software (Jenoptik, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological Analysis of Human Epidermal Equivalents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human epidermal equivalents were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, paraffin‐embedded and 6 µm sections were stained with haematoxylin & eosin. Sections were analysed using an Olympus BH‐2 light microscope (Olympus, Shinjuku, Japan) equipped with a ProgRes C10plus camera (Jenoptik, Jena, Germany) and ProGresCapturePro 2.8.8 image analysis software (Jenoptik, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Systematic quantitative cell analysis was performed by counting manually the number of positive cells for each subset in a maximum of 5 high-power fields (HPF) in each tumor region, using the same field of view in consecutive slides. The number per field, per tumor level and the total count of positive cells in 4 different regions for each subset was quantified. In addition, the CD4/CD8 ratio as well as the Th2/Th1 ratio and CD163/CD68 ratio were assessed. All counts were performed by two independent observers using an Olympus BX50 microscope (40× magnification) equipped with the ProgResC10plus camera (Jenoptik, Jena, Germany). Each investigator was blinded for the BCG outcome and repeated the counts twice. For all immune cell markers excellent intra- and interobserver reliability was achieved (all interobserver ICCs > 0.980; all intraobserver ICCs for examiner 1 > 0.985 and > 0.960 for examiner 2). Thus, the average of all four counts was used for further statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Assessing the Th1/Th2 Landscape in Bladder Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the predisposition for a Th1/Th2 tumor microenvironment prior to BCG, the density of Th1 and Th2 cells in tumor-infiltrating immune cells was measured on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of bladder cancer (in the lamina propria without invasion, at the invasive front, within the neoplastic urothelium and within the papillary stroma) by immunohistochemistry, using a T-bet antibody (monoclonal rabbit antihuman T-bet, MRQ-46, prediluted, Roche) and a GATA3 antibody (monoclonal mouse antihuman GATA3, L50-823, prediluted, Roche), which we had already validated in a recently work [30 (link)]. IHC staining was performed using an automated immunostainer (BenchMark ULTRA, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, US) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. We manually counted the total density of positive cells for each subset in up to 5 high-power fields (HPF) in each region, using the same field of view in consecutive slides. Microscope images were taken with an Olympus BX50 microscope (40x magnification) equipped with the ProgResC10plus camera (Jenoptik, Jena, Germany). IHC evaluation was performed by an experienced uropathologist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Fixation and Fluorescence Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were fixed with paraformaldehyde (PFA). Briefly, 1 mL taken from the respective timepoint was centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 3 min to remove the supernatant and resuspended in 400 mL of PBS and 1.1 mL of PFA solution (4% in PBS, pH 6.9) at 4  °C overnight. Then, the tubes were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 3 min to remove the supernatant, and a further three washes were performed with 1 mL PBS. Finally, the pellet was resuspended in 600 µL of ethanol (50% v/v) in PBS and stored at −20 °C. Optical microscopy was performed through an Olympus, Japan, BX60 optical microscope; micrographs were acquired with a Jenoptik ProgRes C10plus camera (Jenoptik AG, Germany). After fixation, the sample pellet was analysed in epifluorescence mode, and Calcofluor white dye was used in proportion 2:1 (dye:samples).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Starch Birefringence Microscopy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of biscuits (i.e., ground to crumbs) and flour ingredients were suspended in deionised water and examined directly using an Olympus BX60 microscope (Olympus Corporation, USA) under polarised light to display starch birefringence. Images were captured with a ProgRes® C10 plus camera (Jenoptik, Germany) and ProgRes® CapturePro software (Jenoptik, Germany). Starch was stained with 1% iodine-potassium iodide (w/w).
Heated stage polarised microscopy was used to monitor changes in ordered structure during hydrothermal treatment. Composite flours (20 mg) were suspended in excess deioinised water (400 µL), mixed by inversion, and then 50 µL of this suspension mounted on microscope slides, sealed, and then viewed under polarised light while being heated from 25 °C to 80 °C in excess water on a heated-stage (THMS600, Linkam Scientific Instruments Ltd, UK). Images were captured at regular intervals (with LINK System Software, Linkam Scientific Instruments Ltd, UK) to observe changes in starch birefringence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microscopic Analysis of Toxin-Induced Cell Rounding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following microscopes were used for monitoring toxin-induced cell rounding: Axiovert 40 CFL microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany) equipped with a ProgRes C10 plus camera (Jenoptik, Jena, Germany); Leica DMi1 equipped with a Leica MC170 HD camera (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany); Primovert (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany); Lionheart FX Automated Microscope (BioTek, Vermont, United States). Toxin-induced cell rounding was manually quantified in microscopic images and, optionally, facilitated by the Neuralab online tool (https://neuralab.de).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!