The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

52 protocols using nis elements d software

1

Mammosphere Formation Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded to ultra-low attachment 6-well plates (Corning 3,471) with cell density of 2,500 and 3,000 cells per well for BT549 and HS578t, respectively. Cells were cultured in mammosphere medium, containing DMEM/F12 supplemented with B27 (Gibco 12587010) and 20 ng/ml EGF (R&D 236-EG), for 7–8 days. Images of mammospheres were captured by Nikon NIS-Elements D software. Mammosphere with diameter >50 µm were counted using the Nikon NIS-Elements D software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Muscle Fiber and Nuclei Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For myofiber cross-sectional area measurements, images of the entire muscle cross-section were captured and then the cross-sectional area of at least 70 randomly selected myofibers of each myofiber type (Type I, IIa, IIx, and IIb) were measured by tracing the laminin stained periphery of individual myofibers with Nikon NIS-Elements D software (Nikon). For myonuclei and interstitial nuclei identification, 3–5 randomly selected 8.4 mm2 regions of each muscle cross-section were captured, and then all TRIM28 and P-TRIM28(S473) positive nuclei, as well as total nuclei were identified using both the NIS-Elements D software (Nikon) and the Leica LASX software (Leica). The distinction between myonuclei versus interstitial nuclei was achieved by defining nuclei that resided within the dystrophin layer of individual myofibers as myonuclei, while those that resided outside of the dystrophin layer were designated as interstitial nuclei. All image analyses were performed by investigators that were blinded to the sample identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Muscle Fiber and Nuclei Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For myofiber cross-sectional area measurements, images of the entire muscle cross-section were captured and then the cross-sectional area of at least 70 randomly selected myofibers of each myofiber type (Type I, IIa, IIx, and IIb) were measured by tracing the laminin stained periphery of individual myofibers with Nikon NIS-Elements D software (Nikon). For myonuclei and interstitial nuclei identification, 3–5 randomly selected 8.4 mm2 regions of each muscle cross-section were captured, and then all TRIM28 and P-TRIM28(S473) positive nuclei, as well as total nuclei were identified using both the NIS-Elements D software (Nikon) and the Leica LASX software (Leica). The distinction between myonuclei versus interstitial nuclei was achieved by defining nuclei that resided within the dystrophin layer of individual myofibers as myonuclei, while those that resided outside of the dystrophin layer were designated as interstitial nuclei. All image analyses were performed by investigators that were blinded to the sample identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualization of Gold Nanorod Uptake in A549 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A549 cells were plated onto 22 × 22 mm glass cover-slips in a 6-well plate at a density of 1 × 105 per well and allowed to grow for two days. The DMEM medium was then replaced with 2 ml of the same medium containing each AuNR type at a concentration of 1 × 1011 NP ml−1. After 4 h incubation, the AuNR-medium was removed and the cell monolayer on the cover-slip was twice-rinsed with DPBS (14190-094, Life Technologies, UK), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/DPBS for 10 min at room temperature and rinsed with DPBS twice. The fixed coverslips were mounted and sealed onto glass slides. Bright and dark-field microscopy imaging was performed with an inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-E, Nikon UK Ltd, UK) and an oil coupled 100× objective (CFI Plan Fluor, Nikon UK Ltd, UK). Images were recorded with a 5 Megapixel colour camera (DS-Fi1, Nikon UK Ltd, UK) and saved using the NIS-Elements D software (Nikon UK Ltd, UK). Open-source software package ImageJ69 (link) was used to crop and enhance the contrast of saved images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing cAMP Wave Propagation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To visualize cAMP wave propagation, 5x105 cells/cm2 were plated on 1% non-nutrient agar plates and developed in dark moist conditions at 22°C. On a real-time basis, the aggregates were filmed at an interval of 30 s/frame, using a Nikon CCD camera and documented with NIS-Elements D software (Nikon, Japan). For visualizing cAMP optical density waves, image pairs were subtracted [92 (link)] using Image J (NIH, Bethesda, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Morphological Analysis of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological characteristics were evaluated by optical microscopy (Nikon Eclipse NI optical microscope, Nikon Instruments, Amsterdam, Netherlands) after staining with May-Grünwald Giemsa medium (Sigma 32856). The photographs were obtained from a Nikon OS-Fi2 camera (Nikon Metrology Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) and the images were subsequently analyzed using the NIS-Elements D software (version 4.00). Photographs with magnifications of 100×, 200× and 500× were obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mammosphere Formation and Propagation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For first generation of mammosphere formation, cells were seeded to ultra-low attachment 6-well plate (Corning 3471) with cell density of 1000 and 2500 cells per well for HCC1806 and MDA-MB-468 cells, respectively. Cells were cultured in mammosphere medium, containing DMEM/F12 supplemented with B27 (Gibco 12587010) and 20 ng/ml EGF (R&D 236-EG) for 5–6 days. Images of mammospheres were captured by the Nikon Eclipse Tis2 microscope at ×4 magnification objective. Number of mammospheres with diameter ≥70 µm were counted using the Nikon NIS-Elements D software. Second-generation mammosphere-formation assay was performed as previously described [28 (link)]. Briefly, mammospheres from first generation were collected, dissociated by trypsin and washed by mammosphere medium once. All cells were then seeded to a new ultra-low attachment 6-well plate with similar densities and cultured for 5–6 days. Ratio of second-generation mammosphere number to first-generation mammosphere number was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Assessing Cryopreservation Outcomes through Larval Abnormalities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Percentage of abnormal D-larvae was calculated as an indicator of the toxicity of the CPAs. On the contrary, the percentage of normal D-larvae developed after thawing was used to assess cryopreservation outcome. Both parameters were obtained after examining n = 100 cells for each replicate and treatment, under the microscope Nikon ECLIPSE 2000-5 and using Nikon NIS Elements-D software, version 4.13. The discrimination between normal and abnormal D-larvae was determined under a microscope attending to previous work focused on shell larval morphology and guidelines from other experts in the shell abnormalities and abnormally developing larvae of related mollusks in ecotoxicological larval bioassays25 (link),53 (link),54 (link),62 (link),63 (link). Typical larval abnormalities found included delayed development, deviations from the D-larvae shell shape like indented margins or hinge deformations (concave or convex hinges) or presence of clear protruding mantle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying DNA Damage via γH2AX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of immunofluorescence-stained samples (prepared as described in the previous section) were taken using an ECLIPSE Ni-U with DS-Qi2 camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with a 40× lens, and analyzed using NIS-Elements D software (Nikon). For each experimental setting, at least 200 cells within four to five fields were recorded. The γH2AX and DAPI signals were identified by ImageJ (version 1.48, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), from which intranuclear occupancy by γH2AX signals was calculated. Unhit cell was defined as cell in which intranuclear occupancy by the γH2AX signals was less than 1%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In situ Hybridization for HIV and KSHV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For in situ hybridization (ISH), we used a RNAscope 2.5 duplex detection kit and chromogenic probes (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Hayward, CA) to detect HIV and KSHV signals in the KS samples. The detection process was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. HIV and KSHV reactive particles were marked in red and green. Images were captured using an ECLIPSE Ni-U microscope and processed using NIS-Elements D software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!