The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

J w gc column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

J&W GC Columns are high-performance capillary columns designed for gas chromatography (GC) applications. They provide reliable and consistent separation of a wide range of analytes. The columns are available in various stationary phases, lengths, and inner diameters to suit different analytical requirements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

40 protocols using j w gc column

1

Quantification of Fatty Acids by GC-FID

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acids were quantified by gas chromatography coupled with a flame ionization detector (17 (link)). Briefly, after the addition of 300 μL of internal standard fatty acid methyl ester 21:0 and 100 μL of internal standard triglyceride 13:0, 2 mL of methanol, 2 mL of methanol/HCL (3N) and 1 mL of n-hexane were added. The tubes were heated at 100°C for 60 min. After cooling down the tubes to room temperature, 2 mL of water was added. After centrifugation at 1,200 × g for 5 min, the upper phase (hexane) was injected into a gas chromatograph equipped with a CP-SIL 88 column (Agilent J&W GC columns, Part# CP7489).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oil was analyzed by GC (Shimadzu®, Kyoto, Japan) on a gas chromatograph Shimadzu GC 2010 Plus (FID detector) (Shimadzu®, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a DB-5 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) (Agilent® J&W GC Columns, Santa Clara, CA, USA). GC-MS analysis were performed on a mass spectrometer GCMS-QP2010 (Shimadzu®, Kyoto, Japan) at 70 eV with a DB-5 column (same as above). Oven temperature programmed from 60 °C to 246 °C at 3 °C min−1. For the injection (split 1:20), 5.0 μL of the essential oil were diluted in 500.0 μL of dichloromethane, and 1.0 μL of this diluted solution was injected. Identification of volatile constituents was made on the basis of their Kovats indexes (K.I.) and their mass spectra, which were compared with reference data [18 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fatty Acid Profiling of Dried Egg Yolk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acid profile from dried yolk samples (65 °C) was determined using a gas chromatograph Perkin-Elmer Clarus 500 (Shelton, MA, USA) according to the method previously described by Panaite et al. [10 (link)]. The fatty acids from yolk samples were converted to methyl esters of fatty acids (FAME) and their separation was performed on a DB-23 GC capillary column(60 m × 0.25 mm id × 0.25 µm), Agilent J&W GC Columns, USA using a flame ionization detector (FID). The results were expressed in g/100 g total fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). The average amount of each fatty acid was used to calculate the sum of the total saturated (SFA), total monounsaturated (MUFA) and total polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Determination of Cholesterol in Egg Yolk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cholesterol in yolk samples was determined using a Perkin-Elmer gas chromatograph (Shelton, MA, USA) according to AOAC [35 ]. Dried yolk samples (65 °C) were saponified with methanolic KOH solution (50 mL) in a water bath for 1 h. Next, the samples were treated with petroleum ether, concentrated on a rotary evaporator, and brought to neutral pH with distilled water. After removing the petroleum ether, the residue was treated with chloroform (5 mL). Aliquots of 1 μL of the obtained extracts were injected into an HP-5 GC fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm ID, 0.1 µm film thickness; J&W GC Columns, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and analyzed on a detector with flame ionization (FID). Cholesterol was identified by comparing the peak areas with those obtained from the laboratory standard solution. The cholesterol concentration is expressed as g/100 g yolk.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Gas Chromatography for Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For FA determination, we used a Perkin Elmer–Clarus 500 gas chromatograph (Boston, MA, USA), fitted with a flame ionization detector (FID) and capillary separation column with high polar stationary phase Agilent J&WGC Columns (Santa Clara, CA, USA), DB-23 with dimensions of 60 m × 0.250 mm × 0.25 μm, as previously described by Hăbeanu et al. [31 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Automated Isotopic Analysis of Amino Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Automated sampling of amino acid derivatives was conducted using a Trace 1310 GC (Thermo Scientific) in combination with a TriPlus RSH autosampler (Thermo Scientific). A sample volume of 0.1 μl was injected into an injection port held at 240°C in splitless mode onto a capillary column (DB‐35, 30 m × 0.320 mm ID × 0.50 μm film thickness, Agilent J&W GC Columns). The GC oven temperature program for a single injection is detailed in Appendix S2.
All eluting compounds off the column were oxidized inside a GC Isolink II (Thermo Scientific) combustion interface containing a reactor held at 1,000°C. Water was removed through a Nafion membrane downstream of the reactor while CO2 was cryogenically trapped in tubing submerged in liquid nitrogen before transfer to the IRMS (DELTA V; Thermo Scientific) through a Conflo IV (Thermo Scientific) universal interface.
High purity N2 (>99.9997% N2, Airgas) was used as reference gas to initially calculate the isotopic composition. Raw data were drift‐corrected (for drift correction procedure see Appendix S3). Average precision across all amino acids was 0.33‰. Individual precision of each amino acid is given in Appendix S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cholesterol Determination in Dried Egg Yolk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cholesterol content of dried yolk samples (65 °C) was determined using a gas chromatograph Perkin-Elmer Clarus 500 (Shelton, MA, USA) according to AOAC Official Method 994.10: Cholesterol in foods [40 ]. The egg yolk samples were subjected to saponification using 50 mL of methanolic KOH solution (0.5 M) for one hour in a water bath. The next step is the extraction of cholesterol in petroleum ether, followed by concentration in a rotary evaporator and wash with distilled water to neutral pH. After removing the petroleum ether, the residue was taken up again with 3–5 mL of chloroform. Cholesterol was separated on a HP-5 GC capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm id, 0.1 µm film thickness), Agilent J&W GC Columns, USA and detected on a flame ionization detector (FID). An 1 μL aliquot was injected in the GC column. Concentrations were calculated by comparing peak areas with those obtained from the standard solutions and were expressed as g cholesterol/100 g dried egg yolk.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Eugenol Leaching from Dental Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Material test discs for studying leaching of eugenol were made using teflon rings (d = 8 mm, h = 2.8 mm). Test discs were immersed in sterile Milli-Q water (3 ml/disc) and kept at 37 °C. Every week for 18 weeks the water was changed and the amount of eugenol was analysed in the aliquot removed after week 1, 4 and 18.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to perform quantification of eugenol in the aliquots [Agilent Technologies 780 A GC System-5975 Series- with a mass selective detector, model number 63170 A with a HP 5MS UI column installed (Agilent J&W GC Columns, Santa Barbara, CA., USA)].
Five, individually prepared, samples of eugenol of known concentration (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MI, USA) , together with an internal standard were analysed at 150 °C for 6 min. The MS Scan parameters were set to 40–600 m/z. Linear regression was used to establish the calibration curve in the range (6–90) µg/ml. The calibration curve had a correlation coefficient of 0.998 without forcing zero. The MS limit of quantification of eugenol was 0.1 µg/ml.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses of the oils were carried out on a GC-MS Thermo-Electron model Focus DSQ II (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), under the following conditions: DB-5ms (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 mm film thickness) fused-silica capillary column (Agilent J&W GC Columns, Santa Clara, CA, USA); programmed temperature, 60–240 °C (3 °C/min); injector temperature, 250 °C; carrier gas, helium, adjusted to a linear velocity of 32 cm/s (measured at 100 °C); injection type, split (1.0 μL), from 1:1000 hexane solution; split flow was adjusted to yield a 20:1 ratio; septum sweep was a constant 10 mL/min; EIMS, electron energy, 70 eV; temperature of the ion source and connection parts, 200 °C. The quantitative data regarding the volatile constituents were obtained by peak area normalization using a FOCUS GC/FID (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) operated under similar conditions for the GC–MS, except the carrier gas, which was nitrogen. The retention index was calculated for all the volatile constituents using a homologous series of n-alkanes (C8-C32, Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), according to Van den Dool and Kratz (1963) [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GC-ECD Quantification of DEL Bioaccessibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DEL was determined with an Agilent Technologies 7890B GC coupled to an ECD detector. The quantitative analysis was done on an HP-5 column (30 m × 0.320 mm × 0.25 μm film thickness, Agilent J&W GC columns). The oven temperature program was ramped from 100°C (2 min hold time) to 270°C at 6°C/min with a hold time of 10 min. The injection and detector were at 250 and 300°C, respectively. The nitrogen carrier gas was maintained at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. A sample of 1 μL was injected in splitless mode.
Percentages of DEL in the bioaccessible fraction (%) were calculated as follows: BIO × 100/BD, where BIO is the DEL amount detected in the bioaccessible fraction and BD is the DEL amount detected in the same sample before digestion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!