The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Steponeplus pcr machine

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System is a compact, easy-to-use instrument designed for fast and reliable real-time PCR analysis. It features a 96-well block format and can perform a wide range of real-time PCR applications, including gene expression analysis, SNP genotyping, and pathogen detection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

42 protocols using steponeplus pcr machine

1

Quantitative Analysis of Bone Repair Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the fracture callus (n=6 per group, 14 days
post-fracture) using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Madison,
Wisconsin, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA
(cDNA) synthesis was performed with 1 μg RNA using the High Capacity cDNA
Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) following
the manufacturer’s instructions. TaqMan® gene expression assays
(Applied Biosystems, USA) were used for quantifying Collagen Type I
Alpha 1 Chain
(Col1a1) (assay ID: Rn01463848_m1),
Runt Related Transcription factor 2(Runx2) (Rn01512300_m1), Osterix(Rn02769744_s1), and Sost (Rn00577971_m1) expression by
quantitative PCR on an StepOnePlus PCR machine (Applied Biosystems) and were
normalized to the expression of the reference gene Gapdh(Rn01775763_g1). Samples were run in duplicate, and relative expression was
calculated using 2−ddCT, the ddCt was calculated as
dCt[goiRes − refRes] − dCt[goiCon
refCon] where goi is the gene of interest and
ref is the reference gene. For descriptive and statistical
analyses, ddCT was applied as a continuous variable. Minimum information for
publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments (MIQE) guidelines was
followed for designing and interpreting the results of quantitative real-time
PCR21.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Liver Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from frozen liver that had been homogenized in TRI Reagent (Ambion Diagnostics, Austin, TX, USA), using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen N.V., Hilden, Germany). RNA concentration and purity were confirmed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and reverse transcription PCR was carried out using the High Capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was carried out using SYBR Green dye and the StepOne Plus PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). Primers were designed using Primer3 [22 (link)] to the rat genome; primer sequences and GenBank references are included in Supplementary Table S1. Primers were designed to be intron-spanning to avoid amplification of genomic DNA. Product sizes and primer specificity were confirmed using classical PCR and gel electrophoresis before qPCR and melt-curves following qPCR. All qPCR results were adjusted to two reference genes (RPLP0 and GAPDH) using GeNorm for Microsoft Excel [23 (link)] and are presented as fold change in arbitrary units relative to the Gen0-C group, according to the 2−ΔΔCT method [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After inducing differentiation, cells were harvested at different time points. Total RNA from (both treated and control wells) the cultured cells were isolated using RNAiso Plus (Takara). RNA quality and quantity were assessed by Nanodrop UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Two micrograms of total RNA from each sample was reverse transcribed to cDNA using Prime Script RT reagent kit (Takara). Using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Tli RNase H Plus, Takara), RT-qPCR was performed on Applied Biosystems Step one plus PCR machine. The RNA 18S gene was amplified as an internal standard reference gene (invariant control). Fold changes in the target gene expression were normalized to 18S ribosomal RNA gene expression using comparative CT method (2−ΔΔCT method) (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative RT-PCR for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared using Tri Reagent® (Sigma-Aldrich) following manufacturer's instructions. 1 μg RNA was reverse transcribed using ImProm- II Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and quantitative RT-PCR was performed using SYBR-green PCR MasterMix (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) in a StepOne Plus PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). Fold change expression was determined by the comparative Ct method (ΔΔCt) normalized to 60S Ribosomal protein L19 expression. qRT-PCR data are represented as fold increase relative to non-treated cells (Control), which were assigned to 1. Primers for quantitative RT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Cytokine mRNA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The small molecules were used at concentrations representing the EC75 values and were co-stimulated with either 200 ng Pam3CSK4 (Invivogen), 25 µg poly(I:C) or 100 ng lipopolysaccharide (Sigma-Aldrich) at the cell counts and conditions previously described for the cellular luciferase assays. Cells were harvested 24 h post-transfection, washed with PBS, and RNA was extracted using Trizol (Ambion) and chloroform (Sigma-Aldrich). In all, 1–2 µg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using random hex primers and SuperScript III (Life Technologies) into cDNA. Real-time PCR was carried out with 1× FastSYBR Green Plus Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and run on an Applied Biosystems StepOne Plus PCR machine. The expression of mRNAs repressing murine Actb1 and Il-6 were measured (see Supplementary Table 5 for primer sequences used). Target CT values were normalized to Actb1 CT values and used to calculate ΔCT. mRNA expression of target genes were then calculated using the ΔΔCT method (2ΔΔCT). Expression values were analyzed as described in the method for cellular luciferase assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blotting and RT-qPCR Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Western blotting, cells were lysed in 1xSDS loading buffer, and after quantification, bromophenol blue was added to a final concentration of 0.1%. 25~30ug of total protein was resolved in 10% Nupage Bis-Tris gel and probed with primary antibodies listed in the Supplementary Table 3.
For RT-qPCR, total RNA was extracted with Trizol (Life Technology) and 10ug/ml of glycogen was used to enhance precipitation of small RNAs. Total RNA was first treated with DNase I (Promega) followed by reverse transcription with the miScript II RT Kit (QIAGEN, 218160, for microRNA analysis) or the SuperScript™ III First-Strand Synthesis System (ThermoFisher, 18080051, for mRNA analysis). RT-qPCR was performed using the miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (QIAGEN, 218073 for microRNA) or the Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB, M3003L, for mRNA) on a step-one plus PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Hippocampal RNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane in the animal facility, and eight were killed every 4 h (six time points). The brain was quickly extracted, and the hippocampus was removed and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. The time between decapitation and sample freezing was <1 min to limit RNA degradation. The collection of the hippocampal tissue per time point was <20 min (10 min either side of the hour mark).
Total RNA was extracted from frozen whole hippocampi using the miRNeasy total RNA extraction kit protocol (Qiagen, US) following the manufacturer’s guide and included a DNase digestion step. Samples were stored at −80 °C. All samples were assessed for RNA quality and quantity using a Nanodrop (ThermoScientific, US). Samples sent for RNAseq were further assessed for RNA integrity on the 2200 TapeStation system (Agilent, US). Sequenced samples had >8.0 RIN score.
Each PCR contained 1 µL cDNA, with a total volume of 10 µL. qPCR runs consisted of an initial 95 °C holding stage for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C (1 s) and 60 °C (20 s), followed by a melt curve step, consisting of 40 cycles of 95 °C (15 s) and 60 °C (1 min), with a final denaturing step of 95 °C (15 s) using a StepOnePlus PCR machine (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Hepatocyte Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies) was used to isolate total RNA from the hepatocytes according to the manufacturer’s protocol. TaqMan Reverse Transcription reagent (Applied Biosystems) was used to generate cDNA from total RNA. The proprietary probes for rat Nos2 (Rn00561646_m1), Serpine1 (Rn01481341_m1), Tnf (Rn99999017_m1), Il6 (Rn00561420_m1) and Gapdh (Rn01775763_g1) for Q-PCR were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Samples were analyzed using a StepOne Plus PCR machine (Applied Biosystems) in duplicates for each set of experiment, and the average values were used for quantification. Gapdh was used as the endogenous control. The comparative CT method (cycle threshold) was used for quantification of gene expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed on a Step-One Plus PCR machine (Applied Biosystems, Life Technology, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as described previously [35 (link)]. The SYBR green PCR core reagent kit (Applied Biosystems, Life Technology, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used with gene-specific primers and GAPDH-specific primers as a control. Primers used are summarized in S3 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Gene Expression Quantification by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using Quick‐RNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription was accomplished with 0.45 μg of total RNA using random primers and SuperScript III First‐Strand Synthesis Kit for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) (ThermoFisher Scientific). qPCR assays were performed in duplicate on a StepOnePlus PCR machine (Applied Biosystems) using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Primers were synthesized by Sigma–Aldrich. For each sample, differences in threshold cycle values (ΔCt) were calculated by adjusting the Ct of the gene of interest to the Ct of the reference gene GAPDH.
Primers used were as follows: p21 F (5′‐GACACCACTGGAGGGTGACT‐3′) and p21 R (5′‐CAGGTCCACATGGTCTTCCT‐3′), p53 F (5′‐GCCCAACAACACCAGCTCCT‐3′) and p53 R (5′‐CCTGGGCATCCTTGAGTTCC‐3′), GAPDH F (5′‐CAATGACCCCTTCATTGACC‐3′) and GAPDH R (5′‐GACAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAG‐3′).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!