The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using resource s

1

Monoclonal Antibodies against BEST1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monoclonal antibodies against BEST1WT were raised in mice by the Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and selected for cocrystallization aids as described (Kane Dickson et al., 2014 (link)). The antibodies were expressed in mouse hybridoma cells, purified by ion exchange chromatography, and cleaved using papain (Worthington) to generate Fab fragments. The Fab fragments were purified using ion exchange chromatography (Resource S; GE Healthcare), dialysed into buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 75 mM NaCl, 75 mM KCl, and further purified using SEC (Superose 6 increase 10/300 GL; GE Healthcare) using the same buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Overexpression and Purification of Human DNA Polymerase β

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human wild-type DNA pol β was overexpressed from a pET-28 vector in the BL21-CodonPlus-(DE3)-RP Escherichia coli strain. Purification of pol β was carried out as described previously and briefly written here.25 (link) Cell lysate containing pol β was run over GE HiTrap Heparin HP, GE Resource S, and HiPrep 16/60 Sephacryl S-200HR columns, and fractions containing pure pol β were concentrated and stored at −80 °C in 20 mM BisTris propane, pH 7.0, for crystallization. Pol β was determined to be pure by SDS–PAGE, and the final concentration was determined by A280 using a NanoDrop One UV-vis Spectrophotometer (ε = 23 380 M−1 cm−1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Recombinant Expression and Purification of Regnase-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA fragment encoding Regnase-1 derived from Mus musculus was cloned into pGEX6p vector (GE Healthcare). All the mutants were generated by PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis and confirmed by the DNA sequence analyses. As a catalytically deficient mutant, both Asp226 and Asp244 at the catalytic center of PIN were mutated to Asn, which is referred to as DDNN mutant. Regnase-1 was expressed at 16 °C using the Escherichia coli RosettaTM(DE3)pLysS strain. After purification with a GST-affinity resin, an N-terminal GST tag was digested by HRV-3 C protease. NTD was further purified by gel filtration chromatography using a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 pg (GE Healthcare). The other domains were further purified by cation exchange chromatography using Resource S (GE Healthcare), followed by gel filtration chromatography using a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 pg (GE Healthcare). Uniformly 15N or 13C, 15N-double labeled proteins for NMR experiments were prepared by growing E. coli host in M9 minimal medium containing 15NH4Cl, unlabeled glucose and 15N CELTONE® Base Powder (CIL) or 15NH4Cl, 13C6-glucose, and13C, 15N CELTONE® Base Powder (CIL), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification of Recombinant AtxA Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the interaction between AtxA and DNA sequences in vitro, the atxA gene was cloned into the expression vector pET 28-b (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA) with N- and C-terminal 6xHIS-tags and an internal FLAG-tag. The BL21 (DE3) expression strain of E. coli was then transformed with an AtxA expression vector. Cells harboring the AtxA expression vector were cultured at 37 °C in LB medium containing 50 μg/ml kanamycin. After overnight growth, cells were diluted to an OD600 of 0.05 in 200 ml of LB medium containing kanamycin and cultured to an OD600 of 0.5. Next, the cells were induced by adding one mM IPTG and cultured at 25 °C for 16 h. After incubation, the cells were collected by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 10 min and stored at −80 °C. Thawed cells were suspended in eight ml binding buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 10 mM imidazole, one mM PMSF, pH 8.0) and disrupted by sonication. After centrifugation for 15 min at 15,000×g, recombinant AtxA protein was purified by Ni-NTA (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The extract was then desalted by HiPrep 26/10 Desalting (GE, Boston, MA, USA) and purified by RESOURCE S, one ml (GE, Boston, MA, USA) using 25 mM MES, pH 6.5. The final concentration of recombinant AtxA was determined by a Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purifying Proteins via Ion Exchange

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GST-free proteins were diluted into ion exchange buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.4, 0.1 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA and 1 mM DTT) to a final NaCl concentration of 0.1 M and run on a Resource Q (GE Healthcare) anion exchange column. Deletion mutants were run on a Resource S (GE Healthcare) cation exchange column. In both cases the proteins were eluted using a 0.1–1.0 M NaCl gradient. The choice of the column was based on the estimated pI values of the proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Recombinant Expression and Purification of P. abyssi Q9UZY3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four recombinant versions of P. abyssi Q9UZY3 were synthesized and cloned (Genecust) as described in Figure S2. Following the same protocol as for PAN expression, proteins were overexpressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) and cell pellets were resuspended into Buffer 2 (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl), complemented with 0.1% Triton X‐100, 25 mM MgSO4, 0.25 mg ml−1 lysozyme (Euromedex), 0.05 mg ml−1 DNase I grade II (Roche), 0.2 mg ml−1 RNase (Roche) and EDTA‐free protease inhibitor (cOmplete™, Roche). The cells were disrupted by sonication and incubated at 25°C for 30 min. Then the cell extract was treated by heating at 70°C for 15 min and the lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 1 h. His‐tagged Q9UZY3 was purified by using (i) an affinity column (5‐ml HiTrap Chelating, GE Healthcare) with a linear gradient of 20–250 mM imidazole; (ii) a cation exchange column (Resource S, GE Healthcare) with a linear gradient of 50–500 mM NaCl and (iii) a size exclusion column (Superose 12, GE Healthcare) with elution in Buffer 2. For the untagged Q9UZY3, only the purification steps (ii) and (iii) were performed. The final Q9UZY3 concentration was calculated by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm using the predicted extinction coefficient (ProtParam, ExPASy) listed in Table S1. The primers and cloning strategies for expression in bacteria cells are listed in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Expression and Purification of MBD2 Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chicken MBD2MBD (amino acids 1–71) and human MBD2MBD+IDR (amino acids 150–214) were expressed and purified as previously reported (11 (link),13 (link)). Chicken MBD2MBD+IDR, which likewise includes an additional 46 residues (amino acids 1–117), was cloned into the previously described pET32a based vector (13 (link)), and further modified to replace the thrombin cleave site with a TEV protease cleavage site. The resulting thioredoxin fusion construct was transformed into BL21(DE3) Escherichia coli cells grown at 37°C until an OD600 of 0.7 and induced with 1 mM IPTG. Bacteria were pelleted and lysed in 20 mM Tris pH 8, 1 M NaCl with sonication. Proteins were further purified via HisTrapFF (GE Life Sciences) and cleaved using either thrombin (MBD2MBD) or TEV protease (MBD2MBD+IDR). Cleaved proteins were further purified over a Resource-S (GE Life Sciences) ion exchange column and Superdex-75 (GE Life Sciences) using an ÄKTA pure FPLC system (GE Life Sciences). Proteins for NMR analysis were either 2H,15N,13C or 2H,15N labeled. For fluorescence polarization assays the thioredoxin fused protein was purified via HisTrapFF and Superdex-75. For single-molecule experiments MBD2MBD+IDR and MBD2MBD were cloned into pET28a with N-terminal His6 tags and expressed and purified in a similar manner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Purification of DNA Polymerase Beta

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human wild-type DNA pol β was overexpressed from a pET-30 vector in the BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)-RP Escherichia coli strain. Purification of pol β was carried out as described previously and briefly written here (20 (link)). Cell lysate containing pol β was run over GE HiTrap Heparin HP, GE Resource S, and HiPrep 16/60 Sephacryl S-200 HR columns and fractions containing pure pol β were concentrated and stored at –80°C in 20 mM BisTris propane, pH 7.0 for crystallization and 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4 for kinetics. Pol β was determined to be pure by SDS page and the final concentration was determined by A280 using a NanoDrop One UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (ε = 23 380 M−1 cm−1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Purification of PLA2 and SVMP from Venoms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PLA2 and SVMP were purified from the crude venom of T. stejnegeri and P. mucrosquamatus, respectively, by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) (AKTA pure, GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA) with a cation exchange column (Resource™ S, 6 ml, GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA), with elution flow rates of 2 and 3 ml/min, respectively. In brief, 50 mg of crude T. stejnegeri or P. mucrosquamatus venom was dissolved in 1 ml of buffer A (8 mM NaHPO4·12H2O, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4), then filtered through 0.22-μm sterile filters (SLGPR33RB, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and loaded into the cation exchange column pre-equilibrated in buffer A. Subsequently, the column was washed with buffer A to elute non-binding proteins, and binding proteins were eluted by applying a salt gradient from 0 to 1 M NaCl in buffer A. Finally, the column was equilibrated with buffer A to prepare for the next sample load. During the elution process, each fraction was collected according to the absorbance peaks at 215 nm and lyophilized for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Refolding and Purification of MILL2/β2m Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble MILL2/β2m complexes were prepared by rapid dilution refolding. Firstly, denatured inclusion bodies of β2m with 10 mM DTT were diluted in refolding buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.4 M L-arginine-HCl, 6.5 mM cysteamine, and 3.7 mM cystamine) to a final protein concentration of 10 μM with gently stirring for 48 h at 4 °C. Successfully refolded β2m was purified by size-exclusion chromatography with HiLoad 26/60 SuperdexTM 75 prep grade (GE Healthcare). Subsequently, denatured inclusion bodies of MILL2 with 10 mM DTT were diluted in refolding buffer with 10 μM refolded β2m to a final MILL2 protein concentration of 1 μM with stirring for 48 h at 4 °C. Successfully refolded complexes of MILL2/β2m were purified by size-exclusion column chromatography using a HiLoad 26/60 SuperdexTM 75 prep grade column and then cation-exchange column chromatography using RESOURCE S (GE Healthcare). The fraction corresponding to the MILL2/β2m complex was collected and concentrated to 9.5 mg ml−1 in 10 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.0) for crystallization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!