The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Enhanced chemoluminescence

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

Enhanced chemoluminescence is a laboratory technique used to detect and measure the presence of specific proteins or molecules in a sample. It involves the use of a chemiluminescent substrate that emits light when it interacts with the target analyte, allowing for quantification and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using enhanced chemoluminescence

1

Western Blot Analysis of Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell extracts were lysed in SDS buffer, a protease inhibitor cocktail (Promega) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation). After quantifying protein concentrations using BCA reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), proteins were resolved by SDS‐PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane by electroblotting. Membranes were blocked in TBS containing 5% skim milk and probed with the following primary antibodies: goat anti‐galectin‐1 antibody (1:1000, R&D systems), rabbit antibodies against ATF2 (1:1000), phosphorylated ATF2 (1:1000), c‐Fos, phosphorylated c‐Fos (1:1000), c‐Jun (1:1000), phosphorylated c‐Jun (1:1000), AKT (also known as protein kinase B) (1:1000), phosphorylated AKT (1:1000), ERK1/2 (1:1000), phosphorylated ERK1/2 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), DUSP1 (1:1000, Millipore) and β‐actin (1:4000, Medical & Biological Laboratories). Horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated anti‐goat and anti‐rabbit IgGs (1:4000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were used as a secondary antibody for chemoluminescence detection. Signals were obtained by enhanced chemoluminescence (Perkin Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell extracts were lysed in SDS buffer and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Promega). After quantifying protein concentrations using BCA reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) and transferred to PVDF membrane by electroblotting. Membranes were blocked in TBS containing 5% skim milk, and probed with the following primary antibodies: mouse anti-α-SMA (1:2000, R&D Systems), rabbit anti-SM22 (1:2000), rabbit anti-type I collagen (1:2000), mouse anti-fibronectin (1:2000), mouse anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (1:2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific), rabbit anti-SNAIL (1:1000, Cell signaling technology, Danvers, MA), and mouse anti-GS (1:1000, Millipore, Temecula, CA) antibodies. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgGs (1:4000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) were used as secondary antibodies for chemoluminescence detection. Signals were obtained by enhanced chemoluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing MRP4 Protein in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the MRP4 protein, cells were washed twice with cold PBS, collected and centrifuged at 400 g for 10 min. Platelets were washed twice with platelet-washing buffer, collected and centrifuged at 7000 g for 3 min.
Platelets and cell pellets were then resuspended in lysis buffer (RIPA buffer: 10 mm Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 160 mm NaCl, 1 mm EGTA, 1% deoxyxholic acid, 1% Triton, 0.1% SDS) incubated in ice for 30 min and centrifuged at 16 000 g for 30 min. The supernatant was then collected.
Protein extracts (30 μg) were incubated at 37°C for 30 min and separated on 4–12% SDS-PAGE gel, blotted onto PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare, Milano, Italy), and probed with rat anti-MRP4 (Alexis, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania) and mouse anti-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) monoclonal antibodies. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemoluminescence (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
The densitometric analysis was performed with the National Institutes of Health ImageG analyzer programme.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA extraction was carried out with trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (Q-RT–PCR) was performed as described.34 (link)Total protein extracts were obtained and separated as described.34 (link) The following MoAbs were used: mouse anti-MYCN and mouse anti-β-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); and rat anti-Gal-3 purified monoclonal antibody (Space Import & Export). Immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemoluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of H441 Cell Line for PD-L1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize H441 cell line as appropriate positive control, a Western blot analysis was performed. Cells were washed twice in cold PBS, collected and, after centrifugation, solubilized in 10 mMTris-HCl, 160 mMNaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1% deoxycholic acid, 1% Triton, 0.1% SDS and a complete mini-protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (SIGMA Chemicals Company). The cells were left to lyse one ice for 30 minutes and, after centrifugation at 12000 g for 30 minutes, the supernatant was then collected. Protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. Protein extract (30 μg) was incubated at 100 °C for 10 minutes and separated on 4–12% SDS-PAGE gel, blotted onto PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare) and probed overnight at 4 °C with following primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-pan-cytokeratins (2A4), mouse monoclonal anti-PD-L1 (1B12), mouse monoclonal anti-IgG1 (isotype control) (NCG01) (Abcam) and mouse monoclonal anti-EpCAM (C-10) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Membranes were washed three times for 10 minutes in TBS and 0.1% Tween-20 and left to incubate with the appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. After three washes, immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemoluminescence (PerkinElmer). Mouse anti-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) served as a protein loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein extracts were obtained in RIPA buffer (50 mmol l−1 Tris (pH 8.0), 150 mmol l−1 NaCl, 0.5% (w/v) sodium deoxycolate, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 1% (v/v) NP40, 0.001 mol l−1 EDTA and a mix of protease inhibitors). Protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Perkin Elmer). Membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) nonfat dried milk and incubated with primary antibodies (Abs) at the appropriate dilutions. Abs were as follows: goat anti-β-actin, rabbit anti CCND1 and mouse anti-MYCN (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-Gli1, no. 2643 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc). Immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemoluminescence (Perkin Elmer).
Densitometric analysis was carried out using ImageJ. Actin normalized optical density results are reported as numbers under the relevant bands and summarized as bar plots in electronic supplementary material, figure S8.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

MRP4 Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to analyze MRP4 protein, cells were washed twice with cold PBS, collected, and centrifuged at 400 g for 10 min. Cell pellets were then resuspended in lysis buffer (RIPA buffer: 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 160 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1% deoxycholic acid, 1% Triton, and 0.1% SDS) with protease inhibitors, incubated on ice for 30 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 30 min; the supernatant was then collected.
Protein extracts (30 μg) were incubated at 37°C for 30 min [20 (link)] and separated on 4–12% SDS-PAGE gel, blotted onto PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare, Milano, Italy), and probed with rat anti-MRP4 (Alexis, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania) and mouse anti-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) monoclonal antibodies. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemoluminescence (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Osteoblast and Osteoclast Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was isolated from primary osteoblast and osteoclast cultures. Protein isolation and Western blotting was performed as described in Verlinden et al. (9 (link)) Briefly, total protein extracts were isolated and 20 µg of protein was separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) using 4-12% polyacrylamide gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Health care). Membrane blocking was done in TBS (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6; 150 mM NaCl) with 5% non-fat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20 (Merck). The rabbit monoclonal (D39A5) anti-mouse NRP2 antibody (CST) was diluted 1/500, while the mouse anti-actin (Merck) was diluted 1/5000. Incubation with a secondary antibody (Dako) was performed for 1 h at RT, and enhanced chemoluminescence (Perkin Elmer) was used to visualize protein bands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!