The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Discovery qdr series

Manufactured by Hologic
Sourced in United States

The Discovery QDR Series is a line of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) equipment designed for bone density and body composition analysis. The system utilizes advanced X-ray technology to provide accurate and precise measurements of bone mineral density and soft tissue composition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using discovery qdr series

1

Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The diagnosis of sarcopenia was based on Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment [6 (link)].
Muscle mass was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Hologic scanner (Hologic Discovery QDR Series, Bedford, MA, USA), and ASMI (ratio of appendicular muscle mass to squared height) less than 7.0 ​kg/m2 in male or 5.4 ​kg/m2 in female was defined as low muscle mass.
Hand grip strength was assessed with digital dynamometer (CAMRY EH10, Xiangshan, Guangdong), and HGS less than 28 ​kg in male or 18 ​kg in female was defined as low muscle strength.
Physical performance was evaluated by 6-m gait speed test and five chair stand test. It was 6-m gait speed test time more than 6 ​s (low gait speed) or FCST time no less than 12 ​s (low FCST) that was defined as low physical performance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Body Composition and Bone Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA; Hologic Discovery QDR Series; Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA) was used to evaluate bone mineral density, lean mass, and fat mass. The lean mass was defined as skeletal muscle mass, and appendicular muscle mass was defined as the combined lean mass of both arms and legs. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), appendicular fat mass index (AFMI), and appendicular bone mineral density (ABMD) were calculated as each measurement divided by height in meters squared. Grip strength was measured using a Smedley-type handgrip dynamometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Objective Measurement of Physical Activity and Fitness in Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physical activity was measured using pedometers (Walk 4 Life, Plainfield, IL, USA) over seven consecutive days. As previously suggested [21 ], daily step counts less than 1000 and greater than 30,000 were considered erroneous and discarded. In order to maximise data, all valid days of pedometer data were used in the analyses and incomplete data were adjusted, taking into account between child variation, sex, and day of the week differences using a Best Linear Unbiased Predictor as previously described [22 (link)]. This effectively removes the inherent skewness of the absolute number of steps per day by scaling PA with the square root. Cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) was measured using the 20m multistage run, a well-established field test for children [23 (link)]. In each data collection phase, the same technician conducted both the fitness and PA measures. Body composition was measured using dual emission x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA, Hologic Discovery QDR Series, Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA, USA) and Hologic Software Version 12.4:7 was used to calculate percent body fat. Height (portable stadiometer to the nearest 0.001m), weight (portable electronic scales to the nearest 0.05 kg) and BMI (kg/m2) were measured in participants without shoes and wearing light clothing using standard measures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness Assessments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body weight was measured with a calibrated digital scale (to the nearest 0.1 kg; Tanita® PH‐740) and waist circumference (in centimeters) was measured at the level of the superior iliac crest at months 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and at a 24‐month follow‐up. Body composition (percent fat mass) was measured using the dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry (Hologic Discovery QDR series; Hologic) at months 0, 6, 12, and 18. Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured with a maximal aerobic capacity test (VO2max) at months 0, 6, 12, and 18 using a modified Balke treadmill protocol14 and indirect calorimetry (Parvo Medic Truemax 2400).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Body Composition Assessment by DEXA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The medical history of all patients were reviewed. Anthropometric measurements, including height, weight, WC, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were obtained from all participants. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Body composition was measured with a DEXA scanner (Hologic Discovery QDR Series; Hologic, Bedford, MA) by a trained technician. All standard procedures were performed as previously described for previous studies (20, 21) : each subject was reclined in a supine position and was scanned from head to foot in the standard mode. The scanning range width was fixed at 60 cm, and the scanning time was $20 min. The Hologic Whole Body DXA Reference Database Software and Hologic Visceral Fat Software were used to estimate the TBF percentage and SAT and VAT volume.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Osteoporosis Diagnosis Criteria Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A patient was diagnosed with osteoporosis if she fulfilled the WHO criteria for osteoporosis (a T-score of ≤ -2.5SD at the total hip, femoral neck, or lumbar spine) or if she had at least one vertebral fracture and a loss of height of more than 25% on radiography or of more than 40% on VFA, according to Genant's classification [27] (link). Criteria for osteopenia were a T-score between -1.0 and -2.5SD at the lumbar spine and/or hip and no morphometric abnormalities (Hologic DXA equipment, Hologic Discovery QDR Series).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Rodent Bone Density Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using rodent’s calibration feature, excised legs were scanned with DEXA (Hologic, Discovery QDR Series, Bedford, MA, USA) to obtain BMC, BMD, fat mass, lean mass, and total mass [53 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Body Composition Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body weight and body composition were measured with a calibrated digital scale (to the nearest 0.2 lbs.). WC (cm) was measured just over the iliac crests using a tape measure. FM and LM were measured with the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic Discovery QDR Series, Bedford, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Anthropometric and Body Composition Measures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight (SECA 760) and height (SECA 220) was measured following standard procedures by the same trained investigator in each study center. Thereafter, BMI and sex- and age-specific BMI z-scores according to the World Health Organization reference standards were calculated. Bone mineral content (BMC, in g), (BMD, in g/cm2), body fat percent, and lean mass (LM, in kg) were assessed by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) using the HOLOGIC Discovery QDR SERIES in ActiveBrains and the HOLOGIC QDR 4500W in EFIGRO.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DXA Scan for Sarcopenia Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body composition was measured using a DXA Hologic scanner (Hologic Discovery QDR Series, Bedford, MA, USA) by a trained technician, including the fat and muscle mass in the head, limbs, trunk, and internal organs. All standard procedures were carried out as previously described in the literature. The Hologic Whole Body DXA reference database software was used to estimate the regional and whole-body lean tissue. The diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia were based on the Baumgartner diagnostic criteria: appendicular lean mass index (ALMI)=appendicular lean mass (ALM=Arm LM + Leg LM) / height2 in kg/m2. The diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia were ALMI < 7.01kg/m2 and < 5.42kg/m2 in males and females, respectively (17 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!