The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

50 protocols using polysorbate 20

1

Coumarin Encapsulation in Stearic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The coumarin was purchased by Saudi Arabia’s Koch Light Laboratory Limited. Stearic acid, polysorbate 20 (Tween® 20), and dialysis bags (molecular weight of 14,000 Da) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All chemicals were of analytical grade and did not require further purification before use. Deionized (DI) water was used to prepare all solutions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Cedarwood Oil Using GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CO was purchased from Thai-China Flavors and Fragrances Industry (Nonthaburi, Thailand). The obtained CO was analyzed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and the method previously described [23 (link)]. Nile Red, polysorbate 20, Kolliphor EL, methanol, acetonitrile, GABA, diazepam, eugenol, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Captex 300 and Capmul MCM EP were kindly gifted from Abitec (Columbus, OH, USA). Ethanol and isopropanol were from VWR International (Radnor, PA, USA). Purified water was obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q Ultrapure Water purification system (Billeria, MA, USA). [3H]Muscimol (28.5 Ci/mmol) was from PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bevacizumab Effects on Corneal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HLE cells were treated with four concentrations of Bevacizumab: 0.125 mg/mL, 0.25 mg/mL, 0.50 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL for different times depending onto each assay as described in the sections below. These concentrations were chosen based on previous reports studying in vitro effects of Bevacizumab on corneal epithelial cells and fibroblasts [7 (link),8 (link)]. These concentrations were prepared using a stock solution of 25 mg/mL Bevacizumab in serum-free DMEM/F12 supplemented with 0.1% BSA. For the proliferation, scratch wound and colony forming efficiency assay, the drug substrate (sub) as described in the Bevacizumab leaflet, was used as a control in the equivalent amounts corresponding to the four different Bevacizumab concentrations (respectively referred to as sub1–4). The substrate consisted of 240 mg trehalose dihydrate, 23.2 mg sodium phosphate (monobasic, monohydrate), 4.8 mg sodium phosphate (dibasic, anhydrous) and 1.6 mg polysorbate 20 (all from Sigma, Munich, Germany) in 4 mL of DDH2O. The selection of Bevacizumab concentrations and controls was based on previous reports [25 (link),26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nitrocellulose Blotting for Protein Secretion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
100 microlitres of the secreted fractions and 100 µl of 1:20 diluted (in PBS) lysates from the secretion assays were loaded into a bio-blot microfiltration blotting system (BioRad. Cat. No.: 1706545). Samples were left to flow through a 0.45 µm nitrocellulose blotting membrane (Amersham Protran. Cat. No.: 10600002) by gravity 3 (link),55 (link). Membranes were then blocked with a Tris-Buffered Saline (TBS) solution supplemented with 0.1% vol/vol polysorbate 20 (Sigma-Aldrich. Cat. No.: P1379) (TBST) and 2.5% weight/vol non-fat dry milk for 20–40 min at room temperature (RT) on a laboratory rocker. Primary antibodies were diluted in TBST/BSA 5% (weight/vol) and membranes were incubated with this solution overnight at 4 °C on a laboratory rocker. Fluorescent secondary antibodies (donkey anti rabbit IgG – Alexa Fluor 680 – Life technologies. Cat. No.: A10043 or donkey anti mouse IgG – Alexa Fluor Plus 800 – Invitrogen. Cat. No.: A32789) were diluted to 2 µg/µl in TBST/non-fat dry milk 2.5% and membranes were incubated with this solution for 60 min at RT on a laboratory rocker. Fluorescent signal was detected using the iBright imaging system (ThermoFisher Scientific) equipped with a high resolution (9.1 mega pixels) CCD camera and multiplexed laser excitation/emission filters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Standardized Biocontrol Fungus Application

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Beauveria bassiana strain GHA was purchased in the form of Mycotrol ESO (LAM International Corporation, Butte, Montana, USA). Stock Mycotrol ESO was halved with distilled water at a concentration of 1.06 × 1010 conidia/ml (rounded to 1 × 1010). From the stock solution, serial dilutions were prepared using distilled water. Five concentrations of B. bassiana were tested, in addition to a control without fungus. Furthermore, 0.05% of polysorbate 20 (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was added to each treatment and control to reduce formula separation (Dong et al. 2012 (link)). Experimental fungus concentrations were based on previous studies and WHO guidelines (WHO 2005 ; Deng et al. 2017 (link), 2019a (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Polycaprolactone-Based Biotherapeutic Formulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polycaprolactone (80 kDa, Mn), 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, potassium phosphate monobasic and dibasic, and polysorbate 20 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Polydimethylsiloxane, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, and L-histidine were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). D-(+)-trehalose was obtained from VWR International, Inc. (Radnor, PA). Ranibizumab (Lucentis®, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) was obtained from the UCSF Department of Ophthalmology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Formulation and Evaluation of Botanical Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macadamia integrifolia (macadamia) seed oil, Olea europaea (olive) oil, Triticum vulgare (wheat) germ oil, Persea americana Mill. (avocado) oil, Oenothera biennis (evening primrose) oil, and Prunus dulcis Mill. (almond) oil were of cosmetic grade, and were purchased from Namsiang (Chiang Mai, Thailand). Polysorbate 20 (Tween® 20), polysorbate 80 (Tween® 80), polysorbate 85 (Tween® 85), sorbitan oleate 80 (Span® 80), butylene glycol, and hyaluronidase from bovine testes (EC 3.2.1.35) were of analytical grade, and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Deionized water was purified using a Milli-Q water system (EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Sodium acetate (CH3COONa), acetic acid (CH3COOH), hydrochloric acid (HCl), potassium persulfate (K2S2O8), sodium chloride (NaCl), monosodium phosphate (NaH2PO4), and disodium phosphate (Na2HPO4) were of analytical grade, purchased from RCI Labscan Co., Ltd. (Bangkok, Thailand).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Investigating GFP Release Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GFP, L-histidine (Fisher BP383–100), sodium acetate (Sigma S2889), and polysorbate 20 (Sigma P1379) were diluted with HEPES-free ISF buffer. The formulations were: GFP-only (2 mg/mL), GFP-L-histidine (2 mg/mL and 25 μM, respectively), GFP-acetate (2 mg/mL and 25 μM, respectively) and GFP-PS20 (2 mg/mL and 30 mg/mL, respectively). GFP-only formulations were pH 7.4, while GFP formulations with L-histidine, acetate, and PS20 were pH 6. Injections (200 μL) were made into the centre of hydrogels using an Eppendorf repeater E3x (Eppendorf #4987000029) with an Eppendorf 1 mL advanced Combitip advanced (Eppendorf #0030089430) and a 21 G microlance needle, at the injection rate of 10 s/mL. 300 μL of ISF buffer was sampled immediately before injection (i.e., T = 0), then at 10-, 20-, and 30-min post-injection. Thereafter ISF buffer was sampled at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 24-h post-injection. ISF buffer samples were stored in sterile 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes at 4 °C until analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

CeO2-Coated Wafer Cleaning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CeO2-coated wafers were placed
but not submerged in a 40 mL bath of a
0.1 wt % cleaning agent under a rotating PVA brush (Planarcore PVP1ARXR1)
at 50 rpm for 1 min. The four cleaning agents studied in this work
represent micelles, polyelectrolytes, and vesicles: 0.1 wt % Pluronic
P-103 (BASF) as a nonionic micelle, 0.1 wt % Surfonic PE-1198LA (Hunstman)
as a branched anionic micelle, 0.1 wt % poly-sorbate 20 (i.e., Tween
20) (Sigma-Aldrich) as a nonionic vesicle, and 0.1 wt % poly(4-styrene
sulfonate, ammonium salt) (PSSA) (29.52% solids in water, ∼120,000
MW from Scientific Polymer Products, Inc.) as an anionic polyelectrolyte.
The pH of the cleaning solutions was kept constant at 4.0. Additionally,
all micelles and polyelectrolyte networks were formulated at 0.1 wt
% as this is well above their respective CMC and aggregation threshold.
It should be noted this concentration ensures homogeneity in the dispersion
of the supramolecular structure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mangiferin-Based Nanoformulations for DPPH Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mangiferin, Mangifera indica, 1,3,6,7-Tetrahydroxyxanthone C2-β-D-glucoside (MG), polyoxyethylenesorbitan monolaurate, polysorbate 20 (TW20), polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleate, polysorbate 80 (TW80), sorbitan monolaurate (SP20), sorbitane monooleate (SP80), dimethyldidodecylammonium bromide (DDAB), 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), nylon, mixed cellulose esters (MCE), and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes (diam. 25 mm, pore size 0.2 μm) were purchased from Merck, Sigma-Aldrich (Santa Louis, MO, USA). The soybean lecithin (90% phosphatidylcholine) (PC) was Epikuron 200 from Lucas Meyer, Hamburg, Germany. Solvents were HPLC grade and all other chemicals were analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!