The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mouse anti rat cd68 antibody

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States

The Mouse anti-Rat CD68 Antibody is a primary antibody used to detect the CD68 protein, a glycoprotein expressed on the surface of macrophages and monocytes in rat samples. It can be used for applications such as immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and western blotting to identify and quantify these cell types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using mouse anti rat cd68 antibody

1

Quantifying Stent-Induced Arterial Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4% formaldehyde-fixed stented arteries were exposed to 1.5N nitric/5 N hydrofluoric acid at 28°C for 3 hours to dissolve stainless steel wires and the “destented” arteries were routinely paraffin-embedded and cut into 8-micron sections. After deparaffinization, pH 9-buffer thermal epitope retrieval and blocking in 10% horse serum, the sections were consecutively exposed to mouse anti-rat CD62P antibody (LifeSpan BioSciences) or mouse anti rat-CD68 antibody (Serotec), horse anti-mouse biotinylated secondary antibody (Vector Labs) and DyLight548-labeled streptavidin (Vector Labs), and imaged to visualize platelet deposition and macrophage infiltration of stent-implanted arteries, respectively. The number of CD68-positive cells associated with tissue defects left behind by the dissolved stent struts was used as an index for macrophage infiltration. A fraction of the strut defect circumference exhibiting continuous CD62P staining pattern was employed as an index of platelet deposition on stents. The immunofluorescence data was obtained from 3-5 sections per artery and were further used without averaging for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Staining of CD68

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were incubated in mouse anti-rat CD68 antibody (AbD Serotec, Kidlington, UK) at a dilution of 1:100 in 4% horse serum in DPBS overnight. Sections were washed three times in DPBS and incubated in a biotinylated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories) diluted at 1:10,000 in 4% horse serum in DPBS for 4 h. Following secondary antibody incubation, tissues were incubated in alkaline phosphatase (Life Technology, Carlsbad, CA) diluted at 1:100 in Tris-bovine serum albumin for 1 h. Then, tissues were rinsed three times in DPBS and incubated in Fast Blue BB salt (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) for 5 min. Tissues were washed in xylene, mounted using an antifade agent, and cover slipped. The slides were sealed with acrylic and stored in the dark in a laboratory refrigerator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Monocyte Adhesion in Rat Aorta

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monocyte adhesion to the wall of the thoracic aorta in rats was examined by NEMOes as described previously [15 (link), 16 (link)]. Briefly, rats were sacrificed and perfused with normal saline followed by 10% buffered formalin into aorta. After fixation, the aorta was divided into segments 8–12 mm long. Each segment was then placed in 0.05% hydrogen peroxidase, then incubated with mouse anti-rat CD68 antibody (Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA), and diluted 1 : 100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After the staining, the segments were cut open longitudinally along the ventral side with scissors. Specimens were viewed under a microscope (E800; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) connected to an XYZ controller and a digital camera (Media Cybernetics Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA). Pictures were taken at various focal lengths with an automatically regulated Z-stepper and the clearest images were selected automatically to produce a composite image of the whole thoracic aorta by Image-Pro4.5 J (Planetron, Tokyo, Japan) [16 (link)]. To quantitate the exact number of monocytes adhering to the endothelium, we counted separately the numbers of CD68-positive tear-shaped cells around the openings of intracostal arteries in each aorta (1400 μm × 1000 μm) (Figure 1(b)). The cell density in each area was calculated as the cell count divided by the total area by examiners blinded to the treatment regimen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescent Characterization of Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize the expression of Nrf2 in microglia, microglia in culture were fixed in cold methanol or 2% formalin and labeled with rabbit anti-Nrf2 (Santa Cruz) according to the protocol as we described (Zhao et al. 2007b (link)). To demonstrate the ability of microglia to internalize RBC and to determine the spatial relationship between hematoma and microglia/macrophages in the ICH-affected animal brains, we performed double immunofluorescence using rabbit anti-rat RBC antibody (Fitzgerald) and mouse anti-rat CD68 antibody (Serotec) to label phagocytic cells. The RBC and the CD68 were visualized with goat anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa Fluor 546 and goat anti-mouse IgG-Alexa Fluor 488, respectively. The nuclei of the cells were stained with Hoechst 33258.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Staining of CD68

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were incubated in mouse anti-rat CD68 antibody (AbD Serotec, Kidlington, UK) at a dilution of 1:100 in 4% horse serum in DPBS overnight. Sections were washed three times in DPBS and incubated in a biotinylated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories) diluted at 1:10,000 in 4% horse serum in DPBS for 4 h. Following secondary antibody incubation, tissues were incubated in alkaline phosphatase (Life Technology, Carlsbad, CA) diluted at 1:100 in Tris-bovine serum albumin for 1 h. Then, tissues were rinsed three times in DPBS and incubated in Fast Blue BB salt (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) for 5 min. Tissues were washed in xylene, mounted using an antifade agent, and cover slipped. The slides were sealed with acrylic and stored in the dark in a laboratory refrigerator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detecting ROS Production in Renal Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dihydroethidium (DHE) staining was utilized to analyze the location of ROS production as previously described with some modifications (10) . Renal tissue was cut into 3-mm frozen sections and permeabilized by ice-cold acetone for 5 min. Afterward, the section was incubated with mouse anti-rat CD68 antibody (1:100; AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK) at 4°C overnight. Then the section was incubated with goat anti-mouse fluorescein isocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibody (1:50; Jackson ImmunoResearch Lab oratories, West Grove, PA, USA) at room temperature for 2 h. The section was stained with DHE (100 mM; Sigma-Aldrich) at room temperature for 30 min and counterstained with 4¢,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma-Aldrich). The ethidium-DNA fluorescence was examined at 520-nm excitation and 580-nm emission using an epifluorescence microscope (AX80; Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histological Evaluation of Implant Sites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Processing for histological evaluation involved excision of material implant and sham sites along with a margin of surrounding normal tissue. Tissue explants were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Masson's Trichrome (MTC). For immunohistochemistry, sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, processed for antigen retrieval, and stained with mouse anti-rat CD68 antibody (pan macrophage marker; 1:100; Bio-Rad, Herceles, CA, USA), rabbit anti-rat CD3 (T cell marker; 1:1000; Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA), rabbit anti-rat CD4 (T helper cell marker; 1:1200; Abcam), mouse anti-rat CD8a (cytotoxic T cell marker; 1:200; ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), rabbit anti-rat Foxp3 (Treg marker; 1:300; Abcam), or mouse anti-rat IL-17 (Th17 marker; 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Slides were then treated with ImmPRESS® HRP Horse Anti-Mouse IgG Polymer Detection Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) or ImmPRESS HRP Horse Anti-Rabbit IgG Polymer Detection Kit (Vector Laboratories) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Histological assessments were performed by an independent pathologist in a blinded fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Renal Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples of the renal cortex were homogenized on ice in 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) supplemented with protease inhibitors. The protein concentrations were determined with the BCA assay kit (MilliporeSigma; 71285). Total proteins (20 µg) were separated with 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween 20 (TBS-T). Afterwards the membranes were incubated with mouse anti-3-nitrotyrosine antibody (Abcam, 1:1,500 dilution; ab61392) or mouse anti-rat CD68 antibody (Bio-Rad; 1:1000 dilution; MCA341R) overnight at 4°C. Following three washes (3×10 min) with TBS-T, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA; 1:2,000 dilution; 7076) for 1 h at room temperature. Both primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in TBS-T containing 1% BSA. All blots were reprobed with mouse anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) antibody (clone 6C5; MilliporeSigma; 1:2,000 dilution; MAB374) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The signals were visualized with Clarity Western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad; 1705061) using ChemiDoc™ Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad) and quantified with Image Lab Software. The amount of target proteins was normalized relative to GAPDH and presented in arbitrary units (a.u.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin sections of mouse brain were deparaffinized, rehydrated, blocked in 1% H2O2 for 10 min and in 15% normal rabbit (for CD68) or goat (for GFAP) serums in PBS for 30 min; then incubated in a primary antibody overnight, on a shaker at 4°C (Rabbit anti-mouse GFAP antibody, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, 1:1000 dilution or rat anti-mouse CD68 antibody, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, 1:2000 dilution). ImmPRESS Immunohistochemistry Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was used according to the manufacture’s protocol. After antigenic sites were visualized with DAB chromogen, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Rituximab Targeting of BL and CLL Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The B-NHL cell line BJAB representing BL (high miR17 expression) and the CLL/SLL cell line MEC-1 (low miR17 expression) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Invitrogen, Milan, Italy), L-glutamine and a mixture of penicillin and streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy).
Rituximab is an anti-CD20 antibody used as a targeting agent bound on NBs and derived from the clinic.
For immunofluorescence, rat anti-mouse CD68 antibody and the secondary rabbit anti-rat IgG antibody conjugated with TRITC were purchased from Biorad (Milan, Italy) and Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!