The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using cd4 pe cf594

1

T Cell Inhibitory Receptor Profiling in RA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HCs and paired PBMCs and SFMCs from RA patients were stained for the presence of T cell co-inhibitory receptors. Non-specific binding was blocked by 50 µg/ml mouse IgG (Jackson), and surface staining was performed using the following antibodies: CD3 V450 (clone: UCHT1, BD), CD4 PE-CF594 (clone: RPA-T4, BD), CD8 BV785 (clone: RPA-T8, BioLegend), CD25 Alexa 700 (clone: BC96, BioLegend), Tim-3 BV711 (clone: F38-2E2, BioLegend), CTLA-4 PerCPCy5.5 (clone: L3D10, BioLegend), Tigit PE-Cy7 (clone: MBSA43, eBioscience), PD-1 APC (clone: MIH4, BD), Live-dead near IR (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were permeabilized by BD Facs lysing solution and BD Facs Perm Solution 2 (both BD bioscience). Intracellular staining was performed using Eomes PE (clone: WD1928 ebioscience). All antibodies were used in the concentration recommended by the manufacturer. Gating was done on lymphocytes, excluding doublets and dead cells. Gates were set using FMOs. CD3+ CD4+ and CD3+ CD8+ cells were investigated for their expression of T cell co-inhibitory receptors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification of Immune Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were sorted into subsets at the University of Birmingham. The PBMCs were first thawed as described in the Supplementary Data, http://links.lww.com/HC9/A236. CD14+ monocytes were then selected using human CD14 MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Woking, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; CD14+ cell pellets were frozen at −80°C until RNA extraction. Non-CD14+ cells were resuspended in PBS and stained with live/dead marker (Zombie APC-Cy7 at 1:1000; Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 20 minutes at room temperature. Cells were washed and stained with the following fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (BD Biosciences, UK): CD3-APC, CD4-PECF594, CD127-PECy7, CD25-BB515, CXCR3-PerCP-Cy5.5, CCR6-BV421, and CD19-PE for fluorescent-associated cell sorting (using BD Aria Fusion, BD, UK) of the immune cell subsets: (1) CD19+CD3 B cells, (2) CD3+CD4+CD25highCD127low TREG cells, (3) CD3+CD4+CCR6+CXCR3 TH17 cells, and (4) CD3+CD4+CCR6CXCR3+ TH1 cells (Fig. S2, http://links.lww.com/HC9/A236). We used an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody that did not induce T-cell activation (Fig. S3, http://links.lww.com/HC9/A236). All immune cell subsets were sorted into tubes containing RPMI−1640+10% FCS media kept at 4°C during the sorting period. After sorting, cells were pelleted and resuspended in RLT+βME buffer for lysis and RNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Immune Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes were isolated under aseptic conditions from all mice groups and layered on Ficoll Hypaque for density gradient separation of the splenic lymphocytes. These splenic lymphocytes were stained for various cell surface and intracellular markers such as CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD11b, F4/80, and RANKL. Briefly, Aliquots of 1 × 106 splenic lymphocytes were washed with ice-cold 1XPBS and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at 4°C. The cells were washed with FACS buffer (1XPBS + 2% FBS + 0.001% sodium azide) and then labeled with fluorophore tagged antibodies CD3-PB, CD4-PECF594, CD8-PE, CD19-FITC, CD11b-Percp cy5.5 (BD Biosciences, USA), and F4/80 APC-cy7, RANKL-PE (BioLegend, San Diego, USA). Further, the cells were washed with FACS buffer and acquired on FACS Aria (BD Biosciences San Jose, USA). Data analysis was done using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Flow Cytometry of PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and flow-based transmigration assays were performed in a 3D BioFlux flow chamber device (Fluxion Bioscience, San Diego, CA) as previously described.30 (link) The migrated cells were enumerated by a hemocytometer and then normalized to migrated cell numbers determined by flow cytometry. After collection, cells were fixed for 10 minutes in 1% paraformaldehyde at room temperature and washed in phosphate buffered saline + 0.1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, followed by blocking in mouse IgG. Cells were labeled with anti-human CD45 eFluor450, CD8a APC-eFluor780 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CD3Alexa Fluor 647 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), CD19 BV711, and CD4 PE-CF594 (BD Biosciences). Data were acquired using BD FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed by FlowJo software (v.10.4.1; Treestar, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested and stained with antibodies at 4°C for 30 minutes, by washing with 1 mL flow cytometry staining buffer, fixed with 1% formalin solution at 4°C for 30 minutes, and resuspended with staining buffer (PBS, 0.5% BSA, and 2 mM EDTA) before analysis. For flow cytometry analysis of ATO cell harvests, a Fc receptor blocking solution, Human TruStain FcX and a fixable viability dye, zombie yellow (BioLegend, San Diego, California) were added. Antibodies (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California) used for cell surface staining were: CD34-APC (581), CD38-PE (HIT2), CD45RA-PE-CF594 (HI100), CD90-BV421 (5E10), CD10-PE-Cy7 (HI10a), CD7-APC-H7 (M-T701), CD5-BV421 (UCHT2), CD1a-FITC (HI149), CD3-FITC or APC (UCHT1), CD4-PE-CF594 (RPA-T4), CD8-PerCP-Cy5.5 (RPA-T8), TCRαβ-FITC (IP26), TCRγδ-BV421 (B1), CD19-PE (HIB19), CD33-PE-Cy7 (WM53), CD56-FITC (B159). Samples analysis was on an LSR4 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and data analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star, Washington).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Input and migrated cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. After collection, cells were fixed for 10 minutes in 1% paraformaldehyde at room temperature, washed in PBS/0.1 mM EDTA, followed by blocking in mouse IgG. Cells were labeled with anti-human CD45 efluor450, CD8a APC-efluor780 (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA), CD3 Alexa Fluor 647, CD14 BV605 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), CD19 BV711, CD4 PE-CF594 (BD Biosciences), and CD16 PE (R&D Systems). Data were acquired on a BD LSRFortessa SORP flow cytometer running Diva6, and analyzed in FlowJo 9.7.5 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Intracellular Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular staining was performed using FOXP3 Fixation/Permeabilization Buffer (Biolegend -421403) according to the manufacturer instructions.
Antibodies used in this study were the following: TruStain fcX (anti-mouse CD16/32) (Biolegend -101320), CD3-BV711 (BD -563123), CD4-PECF594 (BD -562285), CXCR3-APC (BD -562266), CD44-V450 (BD -560451), Ki67-PECy7 (BD -561283), CD8a (KT15)-FITC (Proimmune 1705F/33790).
The data were acquired using BD LSR-FORTESSA flow cytometer and subsequently analyzed using FlowJo software v10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hematology Analysis of Blood Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood cell counts were immediately determined by an automated Sysmex XT-1800i hematology analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). The percentage of
was determined using monoclonal antibodies: CD3-APC-CY7, CD4-PE-CF594, CD8-BV510 (BD Bioscience, USA), as detailed in previous studies by our laboratory (Cao et al., 2018; (link)Zhang et al., 2016) (link). Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS Navio FC, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using Kaluza 3.0 analysis software (Beckman Coulter) (Fig. S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunophenotyping of Lymphocyte Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the B lymphocytes (CD3 -CD19 + ) and CD3 + CD4 + CD8 -T (CD4 + T cells) cell phenotype, 100 μL whole blood was mixed with appropriate volume of the following monoclonal antibodies: CD3-APC-Cy7, CD4-PE-CF594, CD8-FITC, and CD19-PE-Cy7 (BD Bioscience, USA) and incubated for 15 min away from light at room temperature, then 2 mL of 1× lysing solution (BD Bioscience, USA) was added and vortexed gently and incubated for 10 min away from light at room temperature. After centrifugation at 500g for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded, the cells were washed twice with 2 mL of 1× PBS, followed by resuspension in 500 μL of 1× PBS. Cells were analyzed by FACS using an CYTEK Aurora flowcytometer (CYTEK Biosciences inc., USA). Data was analyzed with Spectro Flo (CYTEK Biosciences inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antigen-specific T cell proliferation assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified B cells were loaded with 20 Lf/ml TT, 100 µg/ml MBP, 30 µg/ml MOG peptide 34-56 or 10 µg/ml CMV (Microbix, Ontario, Canada). Loaded or non-loaded irradiated (1500 Rad) B cells were cocultured 2:1 with autologous CFSE-labelled T cells. T or B cells were cultured separately to analyse non-specific proliferation, which was absent in all tested samples. PHA (Sigma-Aldrich) was included as a positive control. MHCII:TCR interactions were blocked in cocultures with TT using 5 µg/ml azidefree anti-HLA-DR (BD Biosciences), anti-HLA-A/B/C or isotype control antibody (Biolegend) for 3 untreated MS patients, 2 treated MS patients and 5 HC. After 9 days, T cell proliferation was measured by flow cytometry using anti-human CD3 allophycocyanin-Cy7 (Biolegend), CD19 PE-Cy7, CD4 PE-CF594, CD8 PE, CD25 allophycocyanin and 7-AAD (all from BD Biosciences). Analysis was done on a FACSAria II flow cytometer using FACSDiva software (both from BD Biosciences). The ΔPF (%) was calculated as described above. The stimulation index (SI) was calculated by dividing the mean proliferation in response to antigen by the mean background proliferation (CM). An antigenic T cell response was significant when ΔPF > 2% and SI > 1.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!