The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti nanog

Manufactured by Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Sourced in United States

Anti-Nanog is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and analysis of the Nanog protein. Nanog is a transcription factor that plays a crucial role in the maintenance of stem cell pluripotency and self-renewal. Anti-Nanog is a highly specific antibody that can be used in various immunoassays, such as Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry, to identify and quantify the Nanog protein in biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

37 protocols using anti nanog

1

Immunostaining Protocols for Neural Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Explant and clonal cultures were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 1 h on ice. The cultures were immunostained with the primary antibodies for 16 h at 4°C, except in the case of immunostaining with anti-Nanog (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA, sc-30328), which was performed for 1 h at 37°C. The cultures were treated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature.
Neural tubes with attached DRG were dissected from E12 mouse embryos by the method described previously (Hall, 2006 ). The neural tubes with attached DRG were fixed with 4% PFA for 1 h on ice. The fixed tissues were immersed in gradually increasing concentrations of sucrose solution and embedded in OCT compound (Miles, Elkhart, IN, USA). Cryostat sections were cut at 10 µm and mounted on albumin-coated glass slides. The sections were immunostained with primary antibodies for 16 h at 4°C and then treated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the nuclei in cultures and sections were stained with 0.1 µg/ml DAPI (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). DAPI nuclear staining was important for counting the exact number of immunoreactive cells in the DRG cell cultures and for judging cell death. Details of all antibodies used are listed in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunophenotyping of Pluripotent Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was carried out according to standard protocols. Primary antibodies used were anti-OCT4 (#sc5279 Santa-Cruz, Heidelberg, Germany, 1:200), anti-NANOG (#sc293121 Santa-Cruz, 1:200), anti-TRA1-60 (MAB4360 Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany, 1:250) and anti-SSEA-4 (MAB4304 Millipore; 1:250). Secondary antibodies used were goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa-546 (#A-11030 Invitrogen, Schwerte, Germany) and goat anti-mouse IgM Alexa-488 (#A-21042 Invitrogen). Nuclei were co-stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole DAPI (1:2000). Alkaline Phosphatase staining was performed using the Alkaline Phosphatase Staining Kit II (#00-0055 Stemgent, Glasgow, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were incubated with 1X SDS sample buffer and then lysed by sonication. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-p53 DO-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) that recognizes epitopes in the region containing residues 11–25, anti-p53 pAB1801 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) that recognizes epitopes in the region containing residues 32–79, anti-p53 C-terminal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) that recognizes epitopes in the region containing residues 334–383, anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-OCT3/4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-SOX2 (Abcam), anti-NANOG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Tubulin (Millipore Sigma) and anti-BBS9 (Millipore Sigma). Secondary antibodies used were anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Dylight 680 or 800 conjugates) (Cell Signaling Technology). The membranes were scanned with the Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde diluted in PBS for 20 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X 100 diluted in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Then cells were blocked in 10% goat serum with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 60 min on the shaker, followed by anti-HBc (Austral, United States), anti-HA (Sigma, United States), anti-nanog (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, United States), anti-FoxA2 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States), anti-HNF4a (Cell Signaling), anti-AFP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) or anti-ALB (Cedarlane, Burlington, Canada) antibodies in 1:500 dilution with 1% BSA in PBS incubated at 4°C over night. The next day, the primary antibody was washed away and the 594 or 488 fluorescent anti-rabbit secondary antibody and 5 mg/ml 4′,6-DAPI with 1:20,000 dilution were added and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Then, after washing the secondary antibody away, the cells were observed by fluorescent microscopy (Wu X. et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in lysis buffer. Equal amounts of total proteins were loaded onto 4-12% SDS–PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, NJ, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% milk dissolved in TBS containing 0.02% Tween 20 and incubated overnight at 4°C with specific primary antibodies. The membranes were subsequently incubated with specific horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein bands were visualized using a Fusion FX5 system ((Vilber Lourmat, France). The following primary antibodies were used: anti-cleaved caspase 3, anti-E-cadherin, anti-cleaved caspase 9, anti-cleaved PARP1 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-SNAIL1, anti-Vimentin, anti-Twist, anti-Slug, anti-Zeb1, anti-Nanog, anti-Sox2, anti-CD44 (Santa Cruz), anti-N-cadherin and anti-Oct4 (BD Biosciences), anti-Survivin, anti-CD133 (Abcam), anti-ALDH (Avivasysbio), and anti-β-actin (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Pluripotency Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After separation in SDS-PAGE (AA: 10%, AA/BisAA ratio: 36:1), the proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes following overnight incubation with specific primary antibodies. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-actin (Sigma A5441, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-Zeb1 (Sigma AMAb90510, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-Nanog (Santa Cruz sc-293121, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-Oct4 (Cell Signaling #2890s, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Sox2 (Cell Signaling #3579s, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-CTBP2 (Abcam ab128871, Cambridge, UK), anti-CTBP1 (Sigma HPA018987, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-LSD1 (Sigma ABE365, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-TRIM33 (Sigma HPA004345, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and anti-p53 (Cell Signaling #46565, Danvers, MA, USA). The secondary antibodies were from Sigma: anti-mouse (A9917) and anti-rabbit (A0545). Bound antibodies were visualized using the SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate ECL kit (Thermo scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), chemiluminescence was detected using ChemiDoc (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunostaining of Pluripotent and Differentiated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
iPSCs or differentiation culture were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. After permeablization in 1% triton X-100/PBS for 20 min, immunostaining were performed using the following primary antibodies: anti-Oct4 (Santa Cruz), anti-Nanog (Santa Cruz), anti-SSEA1 (Millipore), anti-Gata4 (Santa Cruz), anti-SMA (Abcam), anti-Nestin (R&D). Secondary antibodies used were Alexa Fluor 488/546 anti-mouse IgM, and Alexa Fluor 488/546 anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen). DAPI (Vector Laboratories) was used for staining the nuclei.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Pluripotency Markers in H9 hPSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H9 hPSCs were cultured on MEF feeder cells and stained as described previously50 . Briefly, H9 hPSCs were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min, and incubated with 4A68 or 108-B6, and TRA-1-81 antibodies. The cells were then incubated for 1 h at RT in the dark with R-PE-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgM (Thermo Fischer Scientific). To detect intracellular antigens, cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 after fixation with 4% PFA, and incubated with anti-OCT4 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-SOX2 (Abcam), anti-NANOG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-LC3B (Novus Biologicals), 4A68, 108-B6, and/or anti-PGRMC1 (GeneTex). Cells were then incubated with Alexa 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fischer Scientific) and/or Dylight 649-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories). Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Fluorescence signals were detected with a fluorescence microscope or a Leica TCS SP5 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were incubated with 1X SDS sample buffer and then lysed by sonication. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-p53 DO-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) that recognizes epitopes in the region containing residues 11–25, anti-p53 pAB1801 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) that recognizes epitopes in the region containing residues 32–79, anti-p53 C-terminal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) that recognizes epitopes in the region containing residues 334–383, anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-OCT3/4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-SOX2 (Abcam), anti-NANOG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Tubulin (Millipore Sigma) and anti-BBS9 (Millipore Sigma). Secondary antibodies used were anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Dylight 680 or 800 conjugates) (Cell Signaling Technology). The membranes were scanned with the Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analyzing CD44 Expression in Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleic and cytosolic extracts were prepared from MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells following CD44 siRNA transfection and GSI treatment and from CD44KD MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells following CD44 or CD44-ICD overexpression, as described previously [39 (link)].
For western blotting, the cells were lysed in a RIPA buffer (Biosesang) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). The primary antibodies were anti-GAPDH, anti-CD44, anti-Nanog, anti-Sox2, and anti-Oct4 and were purchased from Santa Cruz, as well as anti-FLAG, which was purchased from Sigma. The proteins of interest were detected using ECL solutions (Amersham Life Science) with a LAS-3000 (Fujifilm) detector according to the manufacturer's directions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!