The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Easy tag protein labeling mix

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

Easy-tag protein labeling mix is a solution containing reagents for the covalent labeling of proteins with fluorescent dyes. The mix provides a simple and efficient method for attaching labels to proteins for use in various analytical techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using easy tag protein labeling mix

1

Determining HAS2 Protein Turnover and Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The turnover of 6myc-HAS2 or K190R mutant 6myc-HAS2, in the absence or presence of USP17/USP17L22, the catalytically inactive C89S mutant USP17 or USP4, was determined by immunoblotting. Protein synthesis was inhibited by treatment with 20 μM cycloheximide (Sigma), followed by incubation for the indicated time periods. The relative 6myc-HAS2 band intensities at 0 h (N0) and later time points (Nt) were quantified, and a half-life was calculated using the formula Nt=N0(1/2)t/t1/2 (www.calculator.net/half-life-calculator).
The stability of HAS2 was also studied by a pulse-chase assay using metabolic labeling with 35S-methionine/cysteine. HEK293T cells in 6-cm dishes were transfected with the indicated plasmids using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After 24 h, cells were washed in PBS and starved for 30 min in methionine/cysteine (Met/Cys)-free culture medium (DMEM, Gibco), supplemented with 10 mM HEPES (Sigma). Cells were then incubated for 30 min with 150 μCi [35S]Met/Cys mix (Easy-tag protein labeling mix; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and chased in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM methionine and 2 mM cysteine, for the indicated time periods. Cells were harvested in PBS, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C until lysis; the amount of HAS2 was determined by immunoprecipitation, followed SDS–PAGE and autoradiography.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pulse Labeling of Proteins with 35S

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were starved for 30 min in Methionine‐Cysteine‐free DMEM (Thermo Fisher Cat # 21013024) and pulse labeled with 0.7 mCi/ml of 35S‐Methionine‐Cysteine mix (EASYTAG™ Protein Labeling Mix, Perkin Elmer Cat # NEG709A001MC) for 5 min. Cells were lysed immediately in RIPA buffer and subjected to SDS–PAGE analysis. Autoradiography images were acquired using Typhoon Biomolecular Imager (Amersham). For quantification of [35S]‐amino acid incorporation 50 microliters of cell extracts were precipitated with 10% trichloracetic acid (TCA) transferred on 3MM filters and subjected to liquid scintillation counting (Packard 2000TR, Perkin Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolic Labeling of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells in culture were washed two times with PBS. They were then incubated for 30 min in media consisting of: DMEM lacking cysteine, methionine, and glutamine; supplemented with 10% FBS, Glutamax (Gibco) 1×, and 110 mg/l sodium pyruvate. Emetine was then added to a concentration of 1 μM, and after 5 min 200 μCi of 35S labeled cysteine and methionine (Easy Tag protein labeling mix, Perkin Elmer) was added. One hour later, cells were thrice washed with PBS, collected and resuspended. Equal amounts of protein were loaded and run on a 12–20% gradient gel. The gel was then stained with Coomassie blue, destained, dried and imaged using a phosphorimager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Protein Synthesis Rates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein synthesis rate was determined as previously described using either 35S radioactive metabolic labelling or a Puromycin incorporation assay2 (link). Briefly, for 35S methionine/cysteine labelling, cells were starved in methionine-free media supplemented with 10% dialysed FBS for 45 min. After starvation, the cells were incubated for 40 min in starvation medium supplemented with 30 μCi ml−1 protein labelling mix (EasyTag protein labeling mix, Perkin Elmer). For the puromycin incorporation assay, the cells were treated for 30 min in culture medium supplemented with 1 μM puromycin. After treatment, the cells were harvested, lysed in RIPA buffer and the labelled proteins were run on an SDS–PAGE gel and blotted on a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. The membranes were either exposed to autoradiography films (GE Healthcare) or incubated with anti-puromycin (clone 12D10, Merck Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!