The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti vimentin antibody

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in Japan, Germany, United States, France

Anti-vimentin antibody is a laboratory reagent used to detect the presence of the vimentin protein in biological samples. Vimentin is a type of intermediate filament protein found in various cell types. The anti-vimentin antibody can be used in techniques such as immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and flow cytometry to identify and quantify vimentin-expressing cells.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using anti vimentin antibody

1

Immunostaining of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prepared cells were used for immunostaining with anti-cytokeratin antibody (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) and anti-vimentin antibody (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA). Cultured cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then treated with PBS containing 10% formaldehyde (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) for 20 min. After washing with PBS containing 1% TritonX-100 (Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan) for 5 min, the cells were treated with a blocking reagent (PBS containing 1% BSA; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 30 min at 37°C. The blocked cells were washed three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween20 (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Japan) for 10 min. The washed cells were probed with a primary antibody and incubated 4°C overnight. Subsequently, after washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween20 for 10 min three times, the cells were incubated with secondary antibody (Goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G [IgG]/fluorescein isothiocyanate [FITC]) (Nordic Immunology, Tilburg, Netherlands) for 30 min at 37°C in the dark. The stained cells were observed under a fluorescence microscopy (IX70; OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Identifying Nasal Epithelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the presence of epithelial cells, the isolated cells that presumably contained nasal epithelial cells were cultured on slide glasses, fixed with ethanol and stained using an anti‐keratin antibody (MAK‐5; Triton, Alameda, CA) as previously described 27. The cells were then incubated with biotinylated horse anti‐mouse immunoglobulins (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) followed by incubation with avidin–biotin peroxidase complexes (Vectastain ABC Kit; Vector Laboratories). Immunocytochemistry was also performed using cultured cells that were isolated from nasal specimens or human embryonic fibroblasts (HEFs) using an anti‐vimentin antibody (DAKO, Santa Barbara, CA) to exclude fibroblast contamination or to confirm the presence of fibroblasts, respectively 27.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-protein extracts were analyzed using the Immuno Cruz Western blotting Luminol Reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) or the SuperSignal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific). The following antibodies were used: anti-GAPDH, anti-phospho-EGFR (Y1068), anti-phospho-AKT (S473), anti-phospho-p44/42 MAP kinase (T202/Y204), anti-AKT, anti-p44/42 MAP kinase, and anti-Snail (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA); anti-EGFR, anti-E-cadherin, and anti-N-cadherin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany); anti-vimentin antibody (DAKO, Milan, Italy); anti-α-tubulin (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy). Densitometric analysis of the blots was performed using the ImageJ software v.1.8.0. Original blots were shown in Figures S5 and S6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of Glioma Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue sections were stained with an anti-ATRX polyclonal antibody (1: 300 dilution, ATLAS Antibodies AB, Bromma, Sweden), anti-GFAP (6F2) monoclonal antibody (1: 200 dilution, DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-IDH1 R132H (H09) monoclonal antibody (1:300 dilution, Dianova, Hamburg, Germany), anti-Ki67 (MIB-1) antibody (1:100 dilution, DAKO), anti-H3K27 M polyclonal antibody (1:700 Millipore, Temecula, USA), anti-p53 monoclonal antibody, DO-7 code M7001 (1:100 dilution, DAKO), anti-PHH3 antibody (1:100 dilution, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA) and anti-vimentin antibody (1:500, DAKO) (Supplementary Table 2). IHC staining was performed using a standard avidin–biotin-peroxidase method with a BenchMark ULTRA system (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, US). The positive control was known positive tissue, and entrapped positive cells were used. For the negative control, the primary antibody was omitted.
ATRX gene mutations were scattered throughout exons and introns, making some sites difficult to capture using NGS. Since the initial version of our customized brain tumor panel could not detect full variants of ATRX mutations, we relied on ATRX IHC, but upgrade version of BTP panel could detect all the mutations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological and autoradiographic analysis of cardiac samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the study, animals were sacrificed by sodium pentobarbital overdose (180 mg·kg−1) and their hearts were excised and snap frozen in isopentane cooled with liquid nitrogen. Contiguous 8 μm sections were obtained with a cryostat at − 22 °C for autohistoradiography and histological staining, respectively.
Distribution of 18F-FDG activity was recorded with an autohistoradiography system dedicated to the detection of electrons and positrons (µImager™, Biospace, France).22 (link) For Hematoxylin-Eosin-Safran (HES) staining, the sections were fixed in 95% ethanol, stained with hematoxylin for 1 minute, eosin and safran for 30 seconds each, before being dehydrated in ethanol 100% and xylene. For the Masson trichrome staining, the sections were fixed by immersion in Bouin solution for 15 minutes and picric acid for 5 minutes. The nuclei were stained with Weigert hematoxylin for 10 minutes, cytoplasm and smooth muscle with Biebrich solution and collagen fibers by immersion for 5 minutes in aniline blue.
For further immunohistology analyses, adjacent 5 µm sections were fixed with paraformaldehyde 4% (VWR, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France), incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody to determine macrophage infiltrates (anti-Vimentin antibody; 1:500; Dako, Les Ulis, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining of Vimentin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H9c2, WT, 247R, tr247R cells and control Rat1-fibroblasts were plated on glass-bottom plates and fixed for 10 minutes on ice using 1:1 methanol/acetone. Cells were rehydrated, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 5 minutes, blocked with 5% donkey serum, and incubated with anti-vimentin antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, 1:200 dilution) in 1% serum with 0.1% Triton X-100 overnight at 4°C. The next day, cells were washed 3 times 5 minutes in PBS, incubated with secondary antibody (Cy-donkey anti-mouse IgG 1:400 in 1% donkey serum, Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) for 45 minutes at room temperature, followed by 3 additional washes with PBS and coverslipping with mounting medium containing DAPI. Images were captured using LSM510Meta scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss, Germany) and a F-Fluar 40x Oil immersion objective (NA = 1.3) under control of Zeiss AIM software, version 4.2, (Zeiss, Germany). The images were created using Zeiss LSM510 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Primary FM and FISS-Derived Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify the origin of primary FM cells obtained from muscular tissue and FISS‐derived cells, ICCs were incubated with vimentin, desmin and anti‐alpha‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA) antibodies. The cells were seeded onto a 96‐well plate (4.5 × 103 cells/well) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h to reach 80%–90% confluence. After removal of the culture medium, the cells in each well were fixed with 80% acetone at −20°C for 10 min, air‐dried at RT and stored at −20°C for subsequent use. One hundred microliters of anti‐vimentin antibody (1:800 dilution) (Dako), anti‐desmin antibody (1:200 dilution) (Dako) and α‐SMA antibody (1:800 dilution) (Dako) were added to each well and incubated for 1 h at RT. After washing with PBS, the EnVision® + Dual Link System‐HRP (DAB+) (Dako) was used following the manufacturer's protocol. The images were evaluated using an inverted microscope (Eclipse TS 100; Nikon) by two pathologists. To quantify the positive cells in the tumour, five high‐power fields were randomly selected and captured and these pictures were analysed using ImageJ software (NIH). The ratio was calculated by dividing the positive cell count by the total cell count. To detect the expression of COX‐2 in FISS and FM cells, ICC was conducted as previously described. The primary antibody was replaced with a COX‐2 polyclonal antibody (Cayman) diluted at 1:200 in PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!