The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using diff quik staining kit

1

Transwell Migration Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A transwell migration system utilizing 8.0 µm pore polyethylene terephthalate (PET, BD Falcon, MA, USA) inserts was used for the migration experiments as we previously described29 (link). Briefly, inserts were placed in 12-well notch plate, and 5 × 104 cells were suspended in DMEM supplemented with 1.0% serum and were seeded in the upper chamber, while DMEM supplemented with 10% serum was used as attractant in the lower chamber. Twenty four hours later, non-migrating cells were gently removed using cotton swab, while migrated cells adherent to the lower surface of the membrane were stained with Diff-Quik Staining Kit (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, USA). The number of migrated cells was counted in six different random fields using bright-field microscope (Axio Observer-A1, Carl Zeiss, Germany) at 5X magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Matrigel-based Invasion Assay for Pancreatic Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Invasion was measured using a matrigel invasion assay (BD Biosciences). In brief, chemoattractant was placed in the wells of a 24-well plate, and pancreatic cancer cells (1 × 105) were plated on each matrigel-coated insert. Cells were then pretreated with and without the corresponding drugs and allowed to invade through the matrigel for 24 h toward the bottom chamber, which contained media and the chemoattractant, CCL25. The invading cells were fixed and stained using DiffQuik staining kit (Siemens; Newark, DE), and those in 5 random adjacent fields at 200× magnification were counted under light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Migration Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (2 × 106 in 2 mL of serum free medium) were plated in the upper chambers of the wells of tissue culture plates containing polyethylene terephthalate membranes (pore size 8 μm, 6 cm in diameter; Corning Glass Work, Corning, NY, USA). The lower chamber contained 3 mL standard medium with 10% FBS. The cells on the lower side of the filter were stained using a Diff‐quik staining kit (Siemens, Munich, Germany) after incubation for 6 h at 37°C, and the number of cells was counted in four microscopic fields per well at a magnification of ×10. Data were collected from three independently performed experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Clonogenic Assay of Cancer Cell Response to Small Molecule Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The colony forming ability of cancer cells treated with the indicated small molecule inhibitor was determined using clonogenic assay as described before26 (link). Briefly, 4 × 104 cells were seeded in 2 ml culture medium in 12-well flat-bottom tissue culture plate, followed by subsequent serial dilution (1:1 to 1:32) in the presence of PTC-209 (5.0 μM), palbociclib (5.0 μM), or combination of PTC-209 and palbociclib (5.0 μM each) compared to DMSO vehicle control. The media was changed with fresh media supplemented with the appropriate inhibitor every 3–4 days. On day 10, the plates were washed and stained with Diff-Quik Staining Kit (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, USA), and were subsequently scanned and the number of colonies were observed under inverted microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Molecular Techniques Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Diff-Quik staining kit was obtained from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. (Newark, DE). Primary antibodies were bought from Abcam (Cambridge, MA) whereas the secondary antibodies were supplied in the kits purchased from ImmunoCruz (Santa Cruz, CA) for immunohistochemical staining and the Amersham ECL Western Blotting Analysis System (GE Healthcare). Ladd industries (Burlington, VT) supplied the Epon epoxy resin. Annexin V Alexa Fluor® 488 and propidium iodide were bought from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). The ELISA kit for Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNFα was obtained from (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Pre-cast 15% gels were bought from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) and Immbilon PDVF membranes from Millipore (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The Halt protease inhibitor cocktail mix was obtained from Thermo Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). PlasticsOne (Roanoke, VA) supplied the cannulae for microinjection. Duke Standards (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 µm) were obtained from Thermo Scientific. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Clonogenic Assay for Transfected MDA-MB-231 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The colony forming ability of transfected MDA-MB-231 cells with miR-205-5p or hsa-miR-214-3p or pre-miR-negative control was assessed employing the clonogenic assay as we described before (31 (link)). In brief, transfected cells (4 × 104) were seeded in 2 ml of DMEM in 12-well tissue culture plate. Subsequently, cells were serially diluted (1:1–1:32). The media was replaced with fresh media twice a week. Ten days later when colonies were formed, plates were washed and subsequently were stained with Diff-Quik Staining Kit (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, USA). The plates were then scanned and the number of formed colonies was counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Assessing the Invasive Potential of HT1080 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasive potential of HT1080 cells was assessed using a BioCoat Matrigel invasion chamber (BD Biosciences). The suspension containing 2.5×104 HT1080 cells was plated in 24-well chambers dishes, and incubated for 22 h at 37°C. Invasive cells were fixed and stained using a Diff-Quik staining kit (Dade Behring, Inc., Siemens Healthcare GmbH). Invasive cells were counted, and invasion rate was calculated using the procedure reported previously (15 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ability of the cells to migrate and invade was determined using a Transwell Chamber assay (BD Biosciences) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were treated with CUDC-907 versus vehicle at specified concentrations for 24 hours, and then plated in the upper Transwell Chamber at a density of 50,000 cells/mL in 500 mL total volume of medium without FBS. In the bottom well, 750 μL of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS was added to act as a chemoattractant. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 22 hours, at which point the cells that migrated/invaded were fixed and stained using the Diff Quik staining kit (Dade Behring). Cells were then photographed and analyzed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Breast Cancer Invasion Assay with IL-6

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular invasion of breast cancer cells was assessed using BD BioCoat™ Matrigel™ Invasion Chamber (Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). MCF-7 cells at a density of 2.5 × 104 per well were seeded in the upper chamber with RPMI-1640 serum free media. The lower chambers were filled either with 500 μL of RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 3% FBS (control), or with different concentrations of IL-6 (10 ng/mL, 25 ng/mL and 50 ng/mL) in RPMI supplemented with 3% FBS. After 72 h of incubation the experiments were stopped and cells were fixed and stained as described before [26] (link). Non-invasive cells that remained in Matrigel or were attached to the upper side of the filter were removed with cotton swabs. Cells on the lower side of the filter, which invade in response to different concentrations of IL-6, were stained using the Diff-Quik staining kit (Dade-Behring, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA) and counted using light microscopy. Invasive cells were quantified by counting three random microscopic fields and expressed as number of invaded cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Semen Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Semen analyses were performed manually according to World Health Organization guidelines (version V) [6 ]; after complete liquefaction of the samples. Semen volume, pH, sperm concentration, motility, and morphology were measured according to established laboratory protocol. To evaluate sperm morphology, the slides were stained with a Diff-Quik staining kit (Dade Behring AG, Düdingen, Switzerland) and strict criteria were applied to sperm viewed under a Nikon microscope with an oil immersion ×100 objective (Nikon Company, Tokyo Japan). Sperm samples were considered to be ‘normal’ when parameters met or exceeded the WHO reference values: concentration ≥15×106/mL, total motility ≥40%, and morphology ≥4% [7 (link)]. Samples with one or more abnormal semen parameters were excluded from this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!