The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using mestrenova 11

1

NMR Spectroscopic Analysis Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was performed in a Bruker Avance III 300 MHz and 500 MHz spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA). All spectra were measured in either d6-DMSO or CDCl3 at 298 K. The spectra were calibrated against the solvent signal (CDCl3 (7.26 ppm) or d6-DMSO (2.50 ppm)) and analyzed using MestReNova 11 from Mestrelab Research S.L. (Santiago de Compostela, Spain)and Bruker Topspin 3.0 software (Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

One-Dimensional 1H-NMR Urine Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The acquisition of one dimensional 1H-NMR urine spectra was performed using a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Kontich, Belgium) operating at 500.16 MHz and equipped with a 5 mm probe PABBO BB-1H. A NOESYPRESAT sequence was used for a total of 64 scans. MestReNova 11 (Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Compostela, Spain) was used for automatic baseline and phase corrections. Spectra were calibrated using the TSP peak and then binned into 0.04 ppm-width integrated regions. The data were imported into Excel (Microsoft Office® 16.35) and the spectra region corresponding to water (4.5 to 5 ppm), urea (5.5 and 6 ppm), clarithromycin and isoproterenol (1.16 to 1.40 ppm) were removed before normalizing to the total area under the curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

NMR Characterization of Crosslinked Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NMR measurements were conducted on a Bruker DRX 500 NMR spectrometer at 500 MHz, apart from measurements shown in the supporting information, which were performed on a Bruker Avance II NMR spectrometer at 300 MHz (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany). Crosslinked samples were removed from the glass substrate. Samples were dissolved in deuterated acetone. Chemical shifts were calibrated to the deuterated solvent signal. Data processing was performed using MestReNova 11.0 software (Mestrelab Research S. L., Santiago de Compostela, Spain). Double bond conversions were calculated from the mean values of integrals at δ = 0.88 ppm (m, 3H, CH3) and δ = 5.39 ppm (m, 2H, CH=CH), integrated from three different samples. Errors were calculated from standard deviations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Structural Analysis of Pegfilgrastim in Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the structure of pegfilgrastim in formulation buffer, PBS buffer, or DMEM medium, spectra of 1D 1H were collected on a Bruker Avance III 850 MHz spectrometer equipped with a QCI cryo-probe. The NMR samples that were analyzed comprised 0.035 mL of pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®), 0.02 mL of D2O, and 0.295 mL of formulation buffer, PBS buffer, or DMEM medium. The experimental temperature was 37 °C. The 1D 1H NMR experiments were performed using Bruker pulse program p3919gp with 128 scans averaged. The experimental time for 1D 1H NMR was 6 minutes. Spectra were continuously collected over a time course of 48 h to monitor structural changes. NMR data were processed and analyzed using MestReNova 11.0 software (Mestrelab Research S.L.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative 1H NMR and UHPLC-UV/MS-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The qHNMR experiments were performed on a JEOL Resonance Inc. (Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) 400 MHz YH NMR spectrometer, model JNM-ECZ400S/L1 at 25 °C (298 K) equipped with a liquid N2 Super COOL probe (NM-Z161331TH5SC). The NMR data were analyzed and processed with JEOL Delta v5.0.4.4 (Delta™ NMR Data Processing Software, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) and/or MestReNova 11.0.4 software from Mestrelab Research S. L. (Santiago de Compostela, Spain). For UHPLC analysis, a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) Nexera UHPLC-UV system equipped with a DAD and employed a Kinetex 1.7 μm XB-C18 100 Å column (50 mm × 2.1mm) and LabSolutions software for data analysis. The column oven, detector cell, and autosampler temperature were maintained at 40 °C, 40 °C and 4 °C, respectively, throughout the analysis.
LC-MS-MS analyses were carried out using a Waters 2695 (Milford, MA, USA) solvent delivery system connected to a Waters SYNAPT quadrupole/time-of-flight (Q/TOF) mass spectrometer operated in the positive ion electrospray mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Oxidative Stress Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The markers of oxidative stress, including 2-hydroxybutyric acid, 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), l-tyrosine, pentosidine, and N6-carboxymethyllysine, as well as the reduced and oxidized glutathione contents from blood serum, were conducted using a Bruker Advance Neo 500 MHz (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (NMR) using deuterium oxide (D2O) as the test solvent and trimethylsilylpropanoic acid (TSP) as the standard internal substance. A 1H-qNMR examination was performed on a 500 MHz spectrometer. The quantitative resonance peaks of each aforementioned molecular marker were at δ2.30 ppm, δ8.09 ppm, δ 7.19 ppm, δ7.44 ppm, δ1.30 ppm, δ2.92 ppm, and δ2.16 ppm, respectively (Figure 1). The data was processed using MestReNova 11.0.4 software (Mestrelab Research S.L., Santiago de Compostela, Spain) to specify peaks, analyze the spectra, and calculate sample concentrations [34 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative 1H NMR Wine Polymer Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Bruker Avance III spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at a frequency of 400.13 MHz and equipped with a BBI probe was used for quantitative 1H NMR interaction experiments. 1H NMR experiments for the identification of new chemical degradation products were conducted on a Bruker Avance Neo 500 MHz system (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with a cryo-TCI probe. All samples were prepared in 5 × 178 mm NMR tubes (Z107374 USC tubes, Bruker, Faellanden, Switzerland) at 298 °K. Data were acquired and processed using TopSpin 3.6.0 and 4.0.7 (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) and MestReNova 11.0.4 (Mestrelab Research, La Coruña, Spain).
The 1H NMR measurements were acquired using a standard 1D pulse sequence (zg) from the Bruker software library (TopSpin 3.6.0 and 4.0.7). The probe was locked, tuned, matched, and shimmed with the sample in place. The specific settings for each sample, and the processing of the spectra were performed as described recently [21 (link),41 (link)]. An in-house taste compound data base was used for the identification of degradation products in the LMW fractions of chemically treated red wine polymers by means of 1H NMR spectroscopy [42 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative NMR Analysis of Cerebral Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H NMR spectroscopy was performed on a Unity INOVA 600 spectrometer equipped with a cryogenic probe (Agilent Technologies, Ltd., Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 25°C. 1H NMR spectra were collected on 64 K data points over a spectral width of 8000 Hz, resulting in an acquisition time of 4.096 s. The delay time was set to 30 s, and water resonance was suppressed by presaturation. The free-induction decays (FIDs) were multiplied by an exponential function with a line-broadening factor of 0.3 Hz prior to Fourier transformation. The 1H signal of the methyl group of DSS-d6 was set to 0 pm and used as a standard signal for peak identification and quantitation of cerebral metabolites of mice with the help of Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank, MestReNova 11.0 (Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Compostela, Spain), Chenomx NMR Suite Professional 5.0 (Chenomx Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada) [18 (link)] and some published papers [19 (link),20 (link)]. To prove the difference in metabolites in the brain tissue of each mouse group, clustering analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed using SPSS 22.0 (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and SIMCA-P 13.0.3 (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Metabolite Profiling of Wild and Cultivated Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC peak areas were post-processed by mean-centering as the default setting in R Studio (ver. 1.2.5042). HPLC peak area boxplot comparisons were performed in Minitab (ver. 18.1) (Minitab LLC., State College, PA, USA) to compared wild samples with cultivated samples. The NMR data were post-processed by median method normalization and Pareto scaling for a better elucidation of the compounds contributing to the separation of each plot in the score plots, and converted to ASCII files using MestReNova 11.0 (Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Campostela, Spain). Spectra in the 0.00–10.00 ppm range were blinded by the solvent peak (2.55 ppm, DMSO-d6) and the region of 8.00–10.00 ppm was characterized by chlorophyll constituents. The water peak (3.3 ppm) was removed by pre-saturation. The signal was integrated into bins of 0.02 ppm in width, resulting in 285 variables. The generated ASCII files were first imported into Microsoft Excel (version 2019) for secondary variable labeling, and then into R Studio for PCA, HCA, and OPLS-DA. The whole data set was used without splitting off a test set for cross-validation in OPLS-DA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

1D 1H NOESY Spectra Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1D 1H NOESY (Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectroscopy) spectra were recorded through a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm inverse probe. The following acquisition parameters were used to record the spectra. 1D 1H NOESY: pulse program = noesygppr1d; size of fid (TD) = 64 K; spectral width (SW) = 20 ppm; transmitter offset = 4.70 ppm; 90° hard pulse (p1) = 8.16 μs; power level for pre-saturation (pl9) = 62.77 dB; dummy scans (ds) = 4; number of scans (ns) = 128; acquisition time = 4.08 s; mixing time (d8) = 0.01 s; recycle delay (d1) = 7 s.
Each spectrum was acquired using TOPSPIN 2.1 software (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) encompassing sample loading, temperature stabilization for 5 min, tuning, matching, and shimming.
NMR raw data (Free Induction Decays, FIDs) were processed using the software MestReNova 11.0 (Mestrelab Research SL, Santiago de Compostela, Spain). The FIDs were zero-filled to 128 K number of points and then underwent the Fourier transformation by applying an exponential multiplication function with a line broadening of 0.1 Hz. Phase and baseline were automatically corrected. The horizontal scale of the chemical shifts is reported in ppm and the TSP-d4 singlet signal, set at δ = 0.00 ppm, was used as a chemical shift reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!