The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Iplex application guide

Manufactured by Labcorp
Sourced in United States

The IPLEX Application Guide is a technical reference that provides information on the features, specifications, and operation of the IPLEX laboratory equipment. The guide covers the core functions and capabilities of the IPLEX system without interpretation or extrapolation on its intended use.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using iplex application guide

1

Efficient SNP Genotyping Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our study, two different platforms were used for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping. For stage 1, genotyping was performed by using the Illumina Omni 1 platform. The Sequenom iPLEX system (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used in stage 2. Polymerase chain reaction and extension primers were designed using Mass ARRAY Assay Design 3.1 software (Sequenom, Inc.). Manufacture’s iPLEX Application Guide (Sequenom, Inc.) was performed for genotyping procedures. All of the genotyping reactions were performed in 384-well plates. Each plate included a duplicate for three or four participants selected at random, as well as six to nine negative controls in which water was substituted for DNA. The average concordance rate was 99.8%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Validating GWAS-Derived SNPs in Hybrid and Landrace Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Sequenom MassARRAY analysis was performed to validate the significant GWAS-derived SNPs located within the major QTL intervals in the hybrid population (289 individuals) and the landrace population (69 accessions) using a MassARRAY compact system (Sequenom, San Diego, CA). Moreover, QTL-derived markers were validated in a landrace population (99 accessions) using the same methods. Primers for these markers (flanking the SNP site for PCR amplification and extension) were designed for genotyping. The primers and genomic sequences are listed in Table S1 and Appendix S1, respectively. PCR was performed in 384-well plates using HotStart Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen). The steps of the PCR program and application of shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) were conducted in accordance with the protocols in the Sequenom iPLEX Application Guide (Version 1, Sequenom, San Diego, CA). Primer extension was performed using an iPLEXTM Reagent Kit (Sequenom), and the genotype was detected using a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer for SNP genotyping.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-Throughput SNP Genotyping by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNP genotyping was performed using the mass array time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Sequenom Company, USA) technique. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and extension primers were designed by the Mass ARRAY Assay Design 3.1 software (Sequenom Company, USA). The genotyping procedures were performed using the manufacturer's iPLEX Application Guide (Sequenom Company, USA). The PCR program for amplification conditions was 94°C, 15 min; 45 cycles × (94°C, 20 s; 56°C, 30 s; 72°C, 1 min); 72°C, 5 min. All the genotyping reactions were performed in 384-well plates, and each plate included four randomly selected duplicates and 6 negative controls; double distilled water was used as the negative controls. The average concordance rate of the genotype was 99.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genotyping for ATM and p53 SNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping for ATM (rs227060 and rs228589) and p53 (rs1042522) SNPs was performed using Sequenom platform (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) in the Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research at Wake Forest School of Medicine (Winston-Salem, NC, USA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and extension primers were designed using MassARRAY Assay Design 3.1 software (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). We followed the manufacturer’s iPLEX Application Guide (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) in performing genotyping procedures. PCR reactions were carried out in 96-well plates. Two negative control (water) samples and two randomly selected replicated samples were randomly plated in each plate. The concordance rate (percentages of agreement) in quality control pairs was over 99%. Technicians were blinded to sample case/control status. The three SNPs conformed to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genomic DNA Extraction and SNP Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood samples with a protease K digestion and phenol-chloroform extraction and purification system according to standard procedures. The genomic DNA was stored at − 20 °C until being subjected to SNP genotyping with the Sequenom platform according to the manufacturer’s iPLEX Application Guide (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA). The samples were scanned through a matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system and genotyped with a MassArrayTyper 3.4 (Sequenom Inc. San Diego, CA). Approximately 10% of the samples (randomly selected) were re-run for quality control purposes. Genotyping call rates were > 90% and the concordance rate reached 99.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping of SNPs in Blood DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood samples by protease K digestion and phenol-chloroform extraction and purification according to standard procedures. The genomic DNA was stored at −20°C until being subjected to SNP genotyping with the Sequenom platform according to the manufacturer’s iPLEX Application Guide (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The samples were scanned through a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry system and genotyped with a MassArray Type 3.4 (Sequenom Inc.). Approximately 10% of the samples (randomly selected) were rerun for quality control purposes. Genotyping call rates were >90% (case group: 96.0% for rs2910164, 94.3% for rs11614913, 94.7% for rs7372209, 94.3% for rs895819, and 96.0% for rs12894467; and control group: 97.5% for rs2910164, 96.9% for rs11614913, 97.9% for rs7372209, 94.6% for rs895819, and 95.9% for rs12894467) and the concordance rate reached 99.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HLA Genotyping via Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seven SNPs (rs3077 at HLA-DPA1; rs9277535, rs2281388 and rs3135021 at HLA-DPB1; rs9366816 at HLA-DPB2; rs2856718 at HLA-DQB1; and rs7453920 at HLA-DQB2) were selected in total. Genotyping was performed according to the mass array time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Sequenom company, USA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and extension primers were designed using MassARRAY assay design 3.1 software (Sequenom company, USA). The genotyping procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s iPLEX application guide (Sequenom company, USA). The PCR amplification conditions included an initial precycle incubation of 94°C for 15 minutes, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 20 seconds, annealing at 56°C for 30seconds, and extension at 72°C for 60seconds. All the genotyping reactions were performed in 384-well plates. Each plate included four randomly selected duplicates and six negative controls using double distilled water. The average concordance rate for the genotypes was 99.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genome-wide genotyping of early-onset prostate cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
938 European-American UM-PCGP early-onset PCa cases were initially genotyped at Wake Forest University using Illumina's HumanHap 660W-Quad v1.1 BeadChip. CGEMS Breast cancer controls were genotyped previously using Illumina's HumanHap550v1 [23] (link). The iControlsDB subjects were genotyped previously using Illumina's HumanHap550v1 (n = 1478) or HumanHap550v3 (n = 1507) commercial genotyping platforms. Follow-up genotyping on JHU subjects was performed at Wake Forest University using the Sequenom system. All the procedures followed the manufacturer's iPLEX Application Guide (Sequenom, Inc. SanDiego, CA) and all the assay reagents were purchased from Sequenom. To ensure the quality of the genotyping, around 2% of the sample duplicates and 2% of the negative controls, in which water was substituted for DNAs, were applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!