The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Micro1401 interface

Manufactured by Cambridge Electronic Design
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Micro1401 is a compact data acquisition interface designed for laboratory and research applications. It provides high-speed data capture and digital I/O functionality to connect a wide range of scientific instruments and sensors to a computer system. The Micro1401 offers real-time data processing capabilities and can be used with Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using micro1401 interface

1

TMS Protocol for Measuring Motor Thresholds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMS was performed with a Magstim® BiStim2 stimulator and two D40 (40 mm) Alpha B.I. coils (Magstim Co., Wales, UK). The smaller coil ensures fitting two coils on children’s heads and avoiding activation of right M1, which may lead to unintended M1-M1 interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) (Ferbert et al. 1992 (link)). Bilateral first dorsal interossei (FDI) electromyography signals were amplified and filtered (100/1000 Hz) (Coulbourn Instruments, Allentown, PA) before being digitized at 2 kHz and stored for analysis using Signal® software and a Micro1401 interface (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK). Participants were seated comfortably, with both arms and hands fully supported on a pillow. TMS data was collected while participants were awake but at rest. Muscle relaxation was maintained during the TMS session through visual and electrophysiologic monitoring. The coil was placed over the left M1 at the optimal site and angle for obtaining motor evoked potentials (MEP) in the right FDI to determine the resting motor threshold (RMT) (Mills and Nithi 1997 (link); Conforto et al. 2004 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Recording Hippocampal Field Potentials in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were placed in a stereotaxic frame, and the plane between the bregma and lambda was adjusted to horizontal. An uninsulated tungsten wire placed in the cortex 2 mm anterior to bregma served as a reference electrode, and the stereotaxic frame was connected to the ground. A tungsten microelectrode (0.1–0.9 MΩ) for recording HPC local field potentials was placed in the right dorsal HPC in the stratum lacunosum-moleculare (3.7 mm posterior to the bregma, 2.0–2.2 mm lateral from the midline and 2.4–2.6 mm ventral to the dural surface) [94 ]. During experiments, AC amplifiers (P-511, Grass-Astromed, West Warwick, RI, USA) were used for recording HPC field potentials, with high-pass and low-pass filters set to 1 Hz and 0.3 kHz, respectively. The field activity was displayed using a digital storage oscilloscope (TDS 3014B; Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA). Signals were digitized by the Micro 1401 interface (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambrige, UK) and saved onto a computer hard drive for subsequent off-line analysis (Spike 2.7 Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Olivary Neurotoxin Effects on Cerebellar Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the recording period (typically 4–6 weeks after the implant surgery), a terminal experiment was performed in five of the animals under pentobarbitone anesthesia (60 mg/kg, i.p.). The olivary neurotoxin 3-acetylpyridine (3-AP; 75 mg/kg in 1 ml/kg saline; Aldrich) or saline was injected intraperitoneally. CFPs were evoked at ∼1.5 × T once every 3 s, and responses were recorded for up to 4 h. A single-channel data acquisition system (Neurolog) was used in conjunction with a Micro 1401 interface (Cambridge Electronic Design) and Spike 2 version 7 (Cambridge Electronic Design) software to capture evoked and spontaneous local field potential (LFP) data (30 Hz to 5 kHz, gain of 1 k Hz, sample rate of 5 kHz). The peak-to-peak amplitude of responses evoked by 20 stimulus trials were averaged every 30 min to study changes in the size of the evoked CFP over time. The same data were also sampled for 30 s at 30 min intervals to investigate changes in the power spectral density (square millivolts per Hertz) in the 200–300 Hz frequency band of the LFP signal (sampled at 0.5 Hz, frequency resolution of ∼1Hz). Spike 2 software was used to analyze both CFP and LFP data, and the results were normalized to baseline at t = −30 min. For LFP data, spectrograms were created using the mtspecgramc.m script from the chronux toolbox in MATLAB (MathWorks; Bokil et al., 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Ankle Postural Responses with EMG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the right SOL, using bipolar surface electrode DE-2.1 (Delsys Bagnoli-8). This muscle was chosen based on its involvement in the production of postural responses at the ankle [29 (link)]. The electrodes were applied over the belly of the muscle in accordance with SENIAM recommendations (seniam.org; [30 (link)]). A reference electrode was positioned on the tuberosity of the right tibia. EMG signals were band-pass filtered (20–450 Hz), amplified (x100-1000) then digitized and sampled at 2 kHz to a computer using Micro1401 interface and Signal 4.07 software (Cambridge Electronic Design Ltd, Cambridge UK) for on-line and off-line analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Theta-Burst Stimulation Induces LTP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The slices were placed in the recording chamber of an interface type and were super-fused at 2.5 mL/min with warm (32 ± 0.5 °C), modified ACSF (see above). A concentric bipolar stimulating electrode (FHC, Inc., Bowdoin, ME, USA) was placed in cortical layer V. Stimuli of 0.033 Hz frequency and duration of 0.2 ms were applied using a constant-current stimulus isolation unit (WPI). Glass micropipettes filled with ACSF (2–5 MΩ) were used to record field potentials. Recording microelectrodes were placed in cortical layer II/III. The responses were amplified (EXT 10-2F amplifier, NPI), filtered (1 Hz–1 kHz), A/D converted (10 kHz sampling rate), and stored on PC using the Micro1401 interface and Signal 2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design Ltd., Cambridge, UK).
A stimulus-response (input–output) curve was made for each slice. To obtain the curve, stimulation intensity was gradually increased stepwise (15 steps; 5–100 μA). One response was recorded at each stimulation intensity. The recording was performed in standard ACSF with stimulation intensity adjusted to evoke a response of 30% of the maximum amplitude. LTP was induced by theta-burst stimulation (TBS). TBS consisted of ten trains of stimuli at 5 Hz, repeated 5 times every 15 s. Each train was composed of five pulses at 100 Hz. During TBS pulse duration was increased to 0.3 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Neurophysiological Stimulation in Monkeys

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In an additional session, we tranquilized each monkey with ketamine (5–10 mg/kg IM) and delivered trains of 12 biphasic, cathodal-first pulses, 200 μs per phase, at 333 Hz and currents up to 100 μA, using a biphasic pulse generator and stimulus isolator (BPG-1 and BSI-1, BAK Electronics, Inc., Umatilla, FL). Currents were monitored by measuring the voltage drop across a 100 Ω in-series resistor with a high-impedance amplifier (DAM80, World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). As trains were generated by a micro1401 interface (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK) at random intervals between 1 and 4 seconds, we observed and palpated the animal’s face, upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity for evoked twitches.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Electrophysiological Data Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Efferent stimuli delivery and data acquisition were managed using in-house Spike2 scripts on a PC with a micro1401 interface (Cambridge Electronic Design). Afferent signals were low-pass filtered (1 kHz, four-pole Bessel; Wavetek) and sampled at 10 kHz. Timing of efferent shock trains was controlled from a digital-output port routed to a stimulus isolator (WPI). Spike2 data files were exported as general text files and processed with custom macros in IgorPro 6.36 (WaveMetrics). We minimized stimulation artefacts offline by subtracting a computed average single shock artefact from each shock stimulus in the raw data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!