The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Psychinfo

Manufactured by EBSCO

PsychINFO is a comprehensive database that provides access to the scholarly literature in the field of psychology and related disciplines. It covers a wide range of topics, including behavioral sciences, mental processes, and the study of the human mind and behavior.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using psychinfo

1

Comprehensive literature search protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A comprehensive search for relevant literature was undertaken by an experienced health information specialist. A draft search strategy was created, piloted, and revised before implementation (S1 Appendix). The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched using the same strategy adapted for each database as necessary (the host platforms used are indicated in brackets): Medline (Ovid); MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (Ovid); Embase (Ovid); The Cochrane Library (comprising the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects); Psychinfo (Ebsco); Social Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science); and Delphis (a University of Southampton Library database). Database searches were conducted during May-June 2016. We also searched the internet sites of international health research funders and health charities (S1 Protocol) during June-July 2016. Reference lists of a random sample of 25% of articles included in the systematic map, and of all studies included in the systematic review were searched to check that relevant studies had not been missed. All references identified from electronic databases were imported into an Endnote reference management library for storage, removal of duplicates, retrieval of the full text versions, and eligibility screening.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Burnout Research in the Middle East

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In PubMed, Web of Science (Thomson Reuters), and PsychINFO (EBSCO), we identified studies using search terms for burnout and Middle Eastern countries (Additional file 2: Table S2). The term “Middle East” has no clear geographic or historical definition due to complex geopolitics [32 ]. There is controversy on the exact countries that are classified as being in this region, though 16 countries are common in most references, which were included in this study: Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen [33 –35 ]. All articles published prior to March 15, 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Further inclusion and selection criteria has been previously described in a companion article that examines burnout among healthcare providers in Sub-Saharan Africa [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Physical Activity Interventions for Minority Men

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nine electronic databases were searched: OVID Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE (Emtree),
CINAHL (Ebsco), BIOSIS Previews, PSYCHINFO (Ebsco), ERIC (FirstSearch), and Cochrane
Library. The main search terms included the primary behavior of interest (physical
activity), study type (intervention), and populations of interest (African American or
Latino men). Search terms were determined with the assistance of a reference librarian and
the same terms were used for each search to ensure accurate identification of relevant
articles. Sample terms included: exercise; physical activity; physical fitness;
program evaluation; intervention study; cardiovascular disease; men’s health;
evidence-based practice; health education; African American, Black, Black American,
Hispanic
, and Latino. See Table 1 for a full list of search terms. Studies
that included African American or Latino adults were searched for based on how the authors
and participants of the published studies defined and operationalized these terms. Studies
were also identified based on the authors’ knowledge of applicable interventions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Systematic Search on Prenatal Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We developed a systematic literature search strategy (Additional file 1) with support of an information specialist (EM) [see Additional file 1]. We used a modified PICO-format to build our strategy around the aspects population (e.g. pregnant women, parents), intervention (e.g. NIPT, prenatal diagnosis/screening) and – to limit our search and thus receive a manageable number of results – outcome (e.g. maternal behavior, anxiety, social support). During testing of our search strategy, we omitted search terms that appeared to be relevant but did not add any relevant citations to the search result. Therefore, the search terms for different databases vary slightly.
We ran our searches on August 8, 2018, in the electronic databases MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EBSCO) and PsychINFO (EBSCO). The searches were limited to studies published from 2011 onwards because NIPT was only introduced in 2011 [16 (link)]. Duplicates were removed using the algorithm of Bramer et al. [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-Intensity Interval Training Adherence Review

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following databases will be searched for articles relevant to the research question: PubMed (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsychINFO (EBSCO), SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science. No date, sample, or language restrictions will be implemented in the search portion of this review. Further manual searches for articles will be conducted by checking the reference lists of each study deemed eligible for inclusion in this review, as well as expert consultation for relevant studies. Where possible and necessary, translations of eligible studies in a language other than English will be attempted.
If available, study protocols and trial registers of included studies will be sought as additional sources of information (i.e., for risk of bias assessments). In instances where not enough information is provided in included studies, personal communications with the study authors via the corresponding author will be carried out to request missing information.
The search strategy for this study will include main keywords of “high-intensity interval training,” “compliance,” and “adherence.” The full search strategy for this review can be found as an additional file (Additional file 2: Full Search Strategy). The search strategy has been pilot tested in each respective database and has been peer-reviewed by a chief librarian according to 2015 PRESS review guidelines [19 (PubMed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27005575/">link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Clinician Emotion and Decision Making

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The first author conducted a computerised search of the bibliographic databases PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL (EBSCO). A health services librarian was consulted for the design of the search strategy. Key subject descriptors and MeSH terms were used to map terms to the database vocabularies. The search terms used were: emotions; emotional intelligence; emotion*; decision making, clinical; clinical decision making; and, clinical reasoning. Limiters were: scholarly journal, English language; and publication 2006-February 2017. Inclusion criteria were: 1) reports empirical data (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods); 2) concerns clinicians in clinical settings; 3) concerns clinician emotion OR clinician emotional intelligence/emotional competence; 4) concerns the effect or influence or relationship between criterion 3 and clinical decision making OR clinical reasoning. The complete search strategy can be found in Additional file 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tuberculosis Screening Strategies Review

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group (CIDG) Information Specialist searched the following databases up to 22 June 2023 (see Appendix 1).

MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 22 June 2023)

Embase Ovid (1947 to 22 June 2023)

LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database; 1982 to 22 June 2023)

CINAHL (EBSCOhost; from 1982 to 22 June 2023)

PsychINFO (EBSCO; from 1967 to 22 June 2023)

Global Index Medicus

Science Citation Index (Web of Science; from 1900 to 22 June 2023)

Social Science Citation Index (Web of Science; from 1900 to 22 June 2023)

Conference Proceedings Citation Index ‐ Science (CPCI‐S, from 1990 to 22 June 2023)

Conference Proceedings Citation Index ‐ Social Sciences & Humanities (CPCI‐SSH, from 1990 to 22 June 2023)

We searched for papers published from 2010, because we wanted to capture recent evidence on current tuberculosis screening strategies and diagnostic tests to ensure optimum relevance. We did not impose language restrictions or apply a filter to limit studies to LMICs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPV Vaccine Uptake in Adolescents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We searched Pubmed (NLM), Medline and PsychInfo (Ovid), and CINAHL and ERIC (Ebsco). A health sciences librarian experienced in developing and documenting search strategies for systematic reviews assisted in developing the search strategy in Medline (see Supplemental Materials). Concepts in the search included: human papillomavirus, immunizations or vaccination, parents or guardians, and adolescents. The search was adapted for use in PsychInfo, Pubmed, CINAHL, and ERIC databases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Search Strategy for SE-AN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The search strategy was designed to optimize the number of papers, anticipating a paucity of research into those living with SE-AN. The search encompassed all years from five bibliographical databases: psychINFO & CINAHL (Ebscohost), SCOPUS, MEDLINE & EMBASE (Ovid), a supplementary search (hand-search, citation tracking), consultation with subject experts and Google Scholar. Index terms, subject headings and keywords (see Additional file 1) were developed in consultation with the university librarian (see acknowledgement).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Systematic Review of Art Therapy for Anxiety

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following 13 databases and two journals were searched: PUBMED, Embase (Ovid), EMCare (Ovid), PsychINFO (EBSCO), The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Review of Effects, Web of Science, Art Index, Central, Academic Search Premier, Merkurstab, ArtheData, Reliëf, Tijdschrift voor Vaktherapie.
A search strategy was developed using keywords (art therapy, anxiety) for the electronic databases according to their specific subject headings or structure. For each database, search terms were adapted according to the search capabilities of that database (S1 File Full list of search terms).
The search covered a period of twenty years: 1997 until October 9, 2017. The reference lists of systematic reviews—found in the search—were hand searched for supplementing titles, to ensure that all possible eligible studies would be detected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!