The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using dc sign fitc

1

Zika Virus Detection in Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde (PFA) and treated with either BSA (extracellular staining) or BSA/Saponin to measure intracellular staining. The following antibodies were used to detect Zika virus: anti-Flavivirus 4g2 mouse IgG2a (NovusBio), anti-Flavivirus 4g2 monoclonal rabbit (Absolute Antibody), anti-Zika virus monoclonal Rabbit (Genetex).
All other antibodies were anti-human: DC-SIGN mouse IgG1 (AZN-D1), anti-langerin mouse IgG1 (10E2) both in house made, PE conjugated CD207 (langerin), APC conjugated CD1a (BD Biosciences), CD86-FITC (BD Pharmingen), CD80-PE (BD Pharmingen), CD83-APC (BD Pharmingen), DC-SIGN-FITC (R&D systems), CD3-APC/Fire750 (Biolegend), CD11c-APC (Biolegend), PEcy7-HLA-DR (BD Pharmingen), APCcy7-CD14 (BD Biosciences), APCcy7-CD11c (Biolegend),APC-AXL (Thermofisher, PE-MerTK (Thermofisher) and anti-Tyro3 (Thermofisher). For secondary detection the following antibodies were used: AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Invitrogen), AF647-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (Thermofisher), FITC-conjugated goat-anti-mouse IgM (Invitrogen), AF488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (Thermofisher).
Flow cytometric analyses were performed on a BD FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences) and data was analysed using FlowJo V10 software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Assay for Viral Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following reagents were used: tripalmitoylated‐lipopeptide Pam3CSK4 (5 μg/mL) (Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA), recombinant human TNF (1 μg/mL) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The following antibodies were used (all anti‐human): CD3‐AF700, CD3‐PerCP (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), CD19‐FITC, CD20‐FITC, CD56‐FITC, (Thermo Fisher Scientific Waltham, MA, USA), CD45‐V500, (BD Horizon, USA), CD1a‐APC (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), CD207‐PE (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA), DC‐SIGN‐FITC (R&D Systems) and anti‐HIV‐1 p24, KC57‐RD1‐PE, (Beckman Coulter). The following reagents were obtained through the NIH AIDS Reagent Program, NIAID: Zidovudine (10 μmol/L), Raltegravir (100 nmol/L) and Indinavir (1 μmol/L).
The following plasmids were provided by Dr. Takaji Wakita at Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Neuroscience: Genotype 2a HCV genomic RNA clone pJFH1 (APP1025) 27. pJFH1‐AM120‐Rluc was provided by Dr. Curt Hagedorn at University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. pNL4.3.Luc_RΔenv provided by Dr. N.R. Landau 28, pHCV_H77_E1_E2(AF009606) Dr. Joe Grove (Addgene) 29.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phenotyping of Activated Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phenotyping of resting and activated moDCs was performed by flow cytometry using anti-human CD1d-phycoerythrin (PE), CD103-FITC, HLA-DQ-FITC, PD-L1-PE (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), CD1a-allophycocyanin (APC), CD40-FITC (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CX3CR1-PE, CD80-FITC, CD83-FITC, CD86-PE, DC-SIGN-FITC, CCR7-PE, CD14-PE (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), B7RP1 (ICOSL)-PE (EBiosciences, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and isotype-matched control antibodies. The ratio of regulatory T-lymphocytes was measured by flow cytometry using anti-human CD25-PE (BD Pharmingen), CD4-FITC (BioLegend), FoxP3-APC (R&D Systems), and anti-IL-10-AlexaFluor488 (BioLegend). The viability of moDCs was determined with 2 μg/ml 7-amino-actinomycin D (LKT Laboratories Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) dye followed by a 24-h activation period with live bacteria or LPS. Fluorescence intensities were measured by FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed by the FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mixed cell suspensions were stained for surface markers with combinations of the following antibodies: CD45-vioblue450, CD11b-PE (Tonbo, San Diego, CA), CD11c-APC, CCR5-PE-Cy7 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), CCR7-PE-Cy7, HLA-DR-FITC, CD3-VioGreen (Miltenyi Biotec), CD3-APC, CD11c-PerCp-Cy5.5, CD1c-PE-dazzle, CD163-APC, HLA-DR-BV570, CD207-APC, CD1a AF700 (Biolegend), CD103-PE-Cy7, CD83-PE, CD14-e780, CD1a-FITC, CD86-e710 (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA), DC-SIGN-FITC, DC-SIGN-PE, DC-SIGN-APC (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN). Dead cells were excluded with 7AAD (Southern Biotech) or zombie dye yellow staining (Biolegend). Analysis was performed on 8-color MACSQuant 10 (Miltenyi biotech) or Gallios (Beckman Coulter) flow cytometers and data analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc. Ashland, OR). Expression of surface markers is shown as percentage of positive cells. Fluorescence minus one (FMO) strategy was used to establish appropriate gates. The gating strategy is shown in supplementary Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mixed cell suspensions were stained for surface markers with combinations of the following antibodies: CD45-vioblue450, CD11b-PE (Tonbo, San Diego, CA), CD11c-APC, CCR5-PE-Cy7 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), CCR7-PE-Cy7, HLA-DR-FITC, CD3-VioGreen (Miltenyi Biotec), CD3-APC, CD11c-PerCp-Cy5.5, CD1c-PE-dazzle, CD163-APC, HLA-DR-BV570, CD207-APC, CD1a AF700 (Biolegend), CD103-PE-Cy7, CD83-PE, CD14-e780, CD1a-FITC, CD86-e710 (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA), DC-SIGN-FITC, DC-SIGN-PE, DC-SIGN-APC (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN). Dead cells were excluded with 7AAD (Southern Biotech) or zombie dye yellow staining (Biolegend). Analysis was performed on 8-color MACSQuant 10 (Miltenyi biotech) or Gallios (Beckman Coulter) flow cytometers and data analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc. Ashland, OR). Expression of surface markers is shown as percentage of positive cells. Fluorescence minus one (FMO) strategy was used to establish appropriate gates. The gating strategy is shown in supplementary Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!