The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gelgreen

Manufactured by Biotium
Sourced in United States

GelGreen is a nucleic acid stain used for visualizing DNA and RNA in agarose gels. It is a sensitive and environmentally-friendly alternative to traditional dyes like ethidium bromide. GelGreen exhibits strong fluorescence upon binding to nucleic acids and can be used with common UV or blue light transilluminators.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

66 protocols using gelgreen

1

Preparation and Separation of Yeast Chromosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CHEF gel plugs were made by resuspending protoplasts in STE (1 M sorbitol, 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM EDTA). Protoplast concentration was adjusted to 4 × 108 cells/ml and added to the same amount of 1.2% low melting agarose gel (Bio-Rad) solution. Protoplast suspensions (2 × 108 cells/ml) containing 0.6% low melting agarose gel were added to 50-well dispensable mold plates (Bio-Rad). Plugs were immersed in 10 ml of NDS (1% N-lauroyl sarcosinate sodium salt solution, 0.01 M Tris-HCl, 0.5 M EDTA) and incubated at 65 spm for 14 to 20 h at 37 °C. NDS was replaced with 0.05 M EDTA three times every 30 min. Plugs in 0.05 M EDTA were stored at 4 °C until use.
CHEF gel electrophoresis was done according to Inami et al.58 . Briefly, chromosomes were separated on 1% SeaKem® Gold Agarose (Lonza) in 0.5×TBE buffer at 4 to 7 °C for 260 h using a CHEF Mapper System (Bio-Rad). Switching time was 1200 to 4800 s at 1.5 V/cm with an included angle of 120°. The running buffer was exchanged every two or three days. Chromosomes of Hansenula wingei (Bio-Rad) were used as a DNA size marker. Gels were stained with 3×GelGreen (Biotium) to visualize chromosomes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CHEF Gel Electrophoresis of Protoplast Chromosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CHEF gel plugs were made by resuspending protoplasts in STE (1 M sorbitol, 25 mM
Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM EDTA). Protoplast concentration was adjusted to 4 × 10 8 cells/ml and added to the same amount of 1.2% low melting agarose gel (Bio-Rad) solution.
Protoplast suspensions (2 × 10 8 cells/ml) containing 0.6% low melting agarose gel were added to 50-well dispensable mold plates (Bio-Rad). Plugs were immersed in 10 ml of NDS (1% N-lauroyl sarcosinate sodium salt solution, 0.01 M Tris-HCl, 0.5 M EDTA) and incubated at 65 spm for 14 to 20 h at 37 °C. NDS was replaced with 0.05 M EDTA three times every 30 min. Plugs in 0.05 M EDTA were stored at 4 °C until use.
CHEF gel electrophoresis was done according to Inami et al. 70 . Briefly, chromosomes were separated on 1% SeaKem® Gold Agarose (Lonza) in 0.5×TBE buffer at 4 to 7 °C for 260 h using a CHEF Mapper System (Bio-Rad). Switching time was 1,200 to 4,800 s at 1.5 V/cm with an included angle of 120°. The running buffer was exchanged every two or three days.
Chromosomes of Hansenula wingei, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Bio-Rad) were used as DNA size markers. Gels were stained with 3×GelGreen (Biotium) to visualize chromosomes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Gel Electrophoresis of PCR and LAMP Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amplification products from the PCR and LAMP assays were documented using conventional gel electrophoresis techniques. In these experiments, we analyzed 10 μL of the LAMP or PCR product by 1.2% agarose electrophoresis in tris-borate-EDTA buffer (TBE). The Quick-Load Purple 2-Log DNA Ladder (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used as a molecular weight marker. Gels were dyed with Gel-Green from Biotium (Fremont, CA, USA) using a 1:10,000 dilution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating siRNA Nanoparticle Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate their stability, siRNA loaded nanoparticles were treated with 50 μl FBS, 50 μl of RNase solution (10 μg/ml) or a mixture of both FBS and RNase, at 37°C for 1 h. The nanoparticles were then degraded after proteinase K treatment (100 μg/ml) and centrifuged. The supernatant was loaded onto a 20% polyacrylamide gel (Novex™ TBE Gels, 20%, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). The gels were run in 1x Tris Borate EDTA (TBE, Sigma Aldrich) buffer for 1 h at 120 V and stained with a 3x concentrated solution of Gel Green (Biotium, Landing Parkway Fremont, California, USA) for 30 min at RT, while gentle shaking. The gel was imaged with the Chemidoc (Bio-Rad Hercules, California, USA) at 254 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Investigating N6amt1–Trm112 DNA-binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EMSA was performed to investigate whether N6amt1–Trm112 possesses DNA-binding ability with several dsDNA and ssDNA oligos of different lengths and sequences. Specifically, 20μl of reaction mixture consisted of 50 pmol DNA in a binding buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM KCl, and 10 mM MgAc2. Reaction was initiated by adding different amounts of N6amt1–Trm112 (250 or 500 pmol) and then incubated at 25 °C for 2 h. The reaction mixture was loaded on a 2.5% agarose gel and visualized under UV with Gel Green (Biotium) staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bacterial Identification via DGGE Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DGGE was performed with DCode™ Universal Mutation Detection System (Biorad, California, USA). The PCR products were loaded onto 10% polyacrylamide gels in 1 × TAE buffer (20 mM Tris, 10 mM glacial acetic acid, and 0.5 mM EDTA pH 8.0) with a denaturing gradient (urea-formamide) that ranged from 40 to 70%. Electrophoresis was carried out at 60°C and a constant voltage of 70 V was applied during 14 h. After electrophoresis the gel was stained using GelGreen™ for 30 min (Biotium, California, USA) before being visualized on a UV transilluminator (Biorad, California, USA). The dominant bands were excised from the gel, eluted in 10 mM Tris–HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl, 0.1% Triton-x 100, pH 9.0, at 95°C for 20 min and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 5 min). The DNA was reamplified by PCR with the conditions mentioned in the “PCR amplification” section. The PCR products from reamplification were purified and sent to sequencing at Macrogen Service Center (Maryland, USA). Sequence data were analyzed with BioEdit v 7.1 software (Ibis Bioscience, California, USA) and submitted to the non-redundant nucleotide data base at GenBank® using the BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) and Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/index.jsp) for bacterial identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Gel Electrophoresis for DNA Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assembly products were analysed on a 1% agarose gel with 1xTAE and run at 80 V. For imaging gels, the DNA was post-stained with GelRed (Biotium) and visualized with a UV illuminator. Three hours run time was sufficient for separating the main band at 10 kb from the side product at 9 kb (Supplementary Figure S2). Extension of our method to longer DNA lengths would benefit from using longer PCR parts to enable straightforward separation of the side products. For extraction, the gel was stained with GelGreen (Biotium) and the bands cut out under blue light to prevent UV induced damage of the DNA. The DNA was then purified with a commercial silica bead kit (Qiaex II, Qiagen). The DNA was quantified with a Qubit fluorometer (ThermoFisher) with typical yields of 0.5–2 ng/μl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PCR-stop assay for G4-oligonucleotides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequences of the test G4-oligonucleotides and the corresponding partially complementary oligonucleotides used in PCR-stop assays are listed in Supplementary Table S3. The reactions were performed in 1× PCR Combination buffer, containing 20 pmol of each pair of oligonucleotides, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 2.5 U Hot Start Taq polymerase (733–1331, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA), and increasing amounts of GA from 0 µM to 100 µM. PCR products were amplified in a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems) with the following cycling conditions: 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. Amplified products were resolved on 3% agarose gel in 1× TBE (100 mM Tris base, 100 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA) and stained with GelGreen (41005, Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA). Gel Image was analyzed on ImageQuant LAS 4000. Three independent reactions were conducted per concentration, and representative lanes were displayed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

LAMP Optimization for E. canis gltA Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The consensus sequence of E. canis gltA from selected samples was used to generate LAMP primers using the online LAMP primer designing software, Primer Explorer version 5 (http://primerexplorer.jp/e/) (Table 1).
LAMP reaction mixtures were prepared by mixing 2.5 µL (1×) 10× isothermal amplification buffer, 6 mM MgSO4, 1.4 mM dNTP mix, a primer mix containing 0.2 µM F3/B3 primers, 1.6 µM FIP/BIP primers, and 0.4 µM LF/LB primers, 8 U Bst 2.0 WarmStart® DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA), 1 µL colori-fluorometric indicator (CFI), 2 µL DNA, and nuclease-free water to achieve a final volume of 25 µL. CFI contains 3 mM hydroxylnaphthol blue (HNB; MP Biomedicals, Aurora, OH, USA) and 0.35% v/v GelGreen (10 000 × Sol, Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) dissolved in distilled water [17 (link)]. For optimizing LAMP condition, six PCR-positive and two PCR-negative samples were subjected to a LAMP assay for 60 min with varying temperatures between 60 °C to 65 °C. A negative control (nuclease-free water) was included in each run. The reaction was then terminated by heating at 80 °C for two minutes. After determining the optimum temperature, reaction time was varied to 30, 45, and 60 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Canine Stem Cell Marker Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT-PCR was performed as described previously [30 (link)] for canine GAPDH [93 (link)], NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 [30 (link)]. Total RNA was isolated from passage 2 cells and cDNA was synthesized. PCR reactions (20 μl) were performed and products were separated via agarose gel electrophoresis for visualization using Gel Green (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!