The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using anti foxo1

1

Analyzing FOXO1 Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell lysates were isolated using a cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with protein inhibitors (Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA). The lysates were then centrifuged at 13,500g for 30 min, and 30 μg of each protein extract was separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Immunoblotting analysis was performed using anti-α-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Cat.# sc-5286) and anti-FOXO1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat. # sc-374427) primary antibodies and a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody. Protein bands were detected using a luminol reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Islet Inflammatory and Dedifferentiation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Islets were harvested, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and immersed in 30% sucrose solution to be embedded in a frozen block. Inflammatory markers and dedifferentiation markers were detected in cell sections by immunofluorescence. Anti-FoxO1 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas, USA), anti-cleaved caspase 3 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Oct4 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-NGN3 (Abcam), anti-A11 oligomer (Invitrogen), anti-Pdx1 (Abcam), anti-IL-1β (Abcam), and anti-insulin (Abcam) were used as primary antibodies. M1/M2 macrophage markers were identified using the antibodies of M2 macrophage differentiation markers (anti-arginase-1; Cell Signaling) and M1 macrophage differentiation markers (CD80; Abcam). Sections were incubated with primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse, and Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit; Abcam) were added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Counterstaining was performed using DAPI (1 : 10,000). Images were obtained from each section using a fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Foxo1 Regulation of Inflammation in PHME Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PHME cells were grown on 8-well chamber slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated in standard or high glucose media for 5 days. In some cases, cells were treated with insulin for 24 h before immunofluorescence. In other cases, cells were transfected with Foxo1 or scrambled siRNA and cultured for another 2 days. Cells were fixed with cold methanol and incubated with anti-Foxo1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-CCL20 (Abcam), anti-IL-36γ (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or matched control (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) antibodies overnight at 4°C. Primary antibody was localized with biotinylated secondary antibody and Alexa 546–conjugated streptavidin. Slides were mounted with DAPI-containing mounting medium. Mean fluorescence intensity was measured by NIS-Elements AR image analysis software, with a maximum fluorescence intensity set at 3,000 arbitrary units to obtain results in the linear response range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of FOXO1 and α-Tubulin in OVCA Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein levels in OVCA433 and OVCA429 cells were measured by western blotting. OVCA433 and OVCA429 cells were homogenized in RIPA buffer (150 mM sodium chloride, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 2 mM EDTA) containing proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Nutley, NJ) to lyse the cells. Then, cell lysates were centrifuged at 13,500×g for 30 min, and supernatants were recovered. Lysate supernatants containing about 30 μg of protein were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and analyzed by western blotting using anti-α-tubulin (mouse antibody clone# sc-5286; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and anti-FOXO1 (mouse antibody clone# sc-374,427; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Culturing and Characterizing HMGA1 Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK-293) cells and HepG2 human hepatoma cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium and RPMI 1640 medium, respectively, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco Laboratories, Grand Island, NY, USA), 2 mM glutamine, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. Cryopreserved primary hepatocytes from HMGA1–/– and wild-type mice [11 (link)] were cultured on matrigel-coated six-well plates in Williams E media (Sigma) supplemented with 10% FBS and then utilized in subsequent experiments. Cultured lymphoblast cell lines transformed with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) were from normal volunteers and previously identified diabetic subjects carrying HMGA1 gene defects [30 (link), 34 (link), 40 (link)], and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 15% FBS. Nuclear protein extracts were prepared as previously [29 (link)] and final protein concentration in the extracts was determined by the modified Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The antibodies used for Western blot studies were: anti-HMGA1 [41 (link)], anti-FoxO1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and anti Sp1 [42 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Expression in Pancreatic Islets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the 72-hour incubation period, human islets were lysed in RIPA buffer containing 20 mmoL/L Tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane (TRIS) pH 7.4, 150 mmoL/L NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (all chemicals from Sigma-Aldrich), and protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
Twenty to fifty microgram proteins were used for separation on a 7.5% (for NOS) or 12% (for forkhead box protein O1, FOXO1) SDS-polyacrylamide gel. After transfer on a nitrocellulose membrane, specific proteins were detected using anti-nNOS (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey), anti-iNOS (BD Biosciences), anti-FOXO1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany), anticleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, Massachusetts), and anti-α-tubulin or anti-β-actin (as internal controls; Sigma-Aldrich) antibodies. Acquisition and quantification of chemiluminescent signals were performed using Bio-1D image analysis software (Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Vallée, France). Histograms accompanying each Western blotting represent the mean of relative quantification performed on different islet preparations. Each figure is representative of two to three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested and lysed with ice-cold lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% w/v sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 10% glycerol. After centrifugation, the supernatants were quantified and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Bioscience, Buckinghamshire, UK). After blocking with 10% nonfat milk in Tris-buffer saline (TBS), membranes were immunoblotted with antibodies, followed by HRP-linked secondary antibodies. Detection of antibody binding was performed using the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Amersham, UK). All western blot analyses were repeated three times. Anti-FOXO1, anti-cyclin D1, anti-p27, and anti-p21 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Protein levels were normalized to total GAPDH, using a rabbit polyclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of FoxO1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed with SimpleChIP enzymatic ChIP kit (Cell Signaling) with anti-FoxO1 (SantaCruz) as described [72 (link)]. The immunoprecipitated DNA subjected to RT-PCR analysis with iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) using the primer (SABiosciences, catalog no. GPM1030787(-)02A) that amplify a region of the mouse irf4 promoter containing the predicted FoxO1 binding sites. Data were analyzed with the LightCycler 480 software. The results were normalized to control IgG and input DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Expression Analysis in Liver and Colon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver and colon tissue were resected, homogenized, and centrifuged (15,000 rpm for 5 min). The protein supernatants were collected and then total protein was extracted with tissue protein extraction reagent (T‐PER, Pierce Biotechnology). Total protein content was determined using the BCA assay kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. The proteins in each sample were separated by SDS‐PAGE (10%–12% gel) and then transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore Corp.). PVDF membrane was sealed with 5% skimmed milk at room temperature for 1 h and incubated with primary antibody at 4°C overnight. After washing with Tris‐buffered saline (TBS) for three times, the membranes and corresponding secondary antibodies were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The materials used included anti‐ZO‐1 (Sangon) and anti‐Claudin1, anti‐Sirt1, anti‐PGC‐1α, anti‐FoxO1, and corresponding secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!