The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Itraq reagent

Manufactured by AB Sciex
Sourced in United States

The iTRAQ reagents are a set of chemical labels used in mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify and quantify proteins in multiple samples simultaneously. These reagents enable researchers to compare protein expression levels across different experimental conditions or samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

67 protocols using itraq reagent

1

iTRAQ-Based Proteomic Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on the quantitation results, 100 μg of proteins were mixed with 5 μg of trypsin (MERCK, Germany) in a total volume of 100 μl, which was then incubated at 37 oC for 16 h. Another 5 μg of trypsin was added and the solution was incubated at 37 oC for an additional 8 h. iTRAQ labeling was performed based on previous described protocols with minor modifications [13 (link)]. Briefly, the trypsin-digested peptides were using vacuum centrifugation. The peptides were re-dissolved in 0.5 M TEAB buffer and subjected to iTRAQ labeling. In brief, the iTRAQ reagents (SCIEX, USA) were reconstituted in isopropanol to a final concentration of 20 mM. The peptides were then incubated with the iTRAQ reagents at 25 oC for 2 h. The labeled peptides were dried using vacuum centrifugation, re-solubilized in buffer A consisting of 25 mM NaH2PO4 in 25% acetonitrile at pH 2.7, and pooled to a combined volume of 4 mL prior to fractionation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of CTOSs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein extraction, cell line samples and CTOS samples were incubated in 9.8 M urea containing 1% phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) and 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) for 30 minutes at room temperature, before centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 10°C. Extracted proteins from CTOS samples and cell line samples were reduced, alkylated, digested with trypsin, and labeled with iTRAQ reagents (AB SCIEX, Framingham, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell line samples were labeled with iTRAQ reagent 113. The SCLC-CTOS LC26 was labeled with iTRAQ reagent 114. The MACL-CTOS LC193 was labeled with iTRAQ reagent 115. The SMCC-CTOS cerv23, cerv5, and cerv9 were labeled with iTRAQ reagents 116, 117, and 118, respectively. The SCC-CTOS cerv44 was labeled with iTRAQ reagent 119, and the MACC-CTOS cerv46 was labeled with iTRAQ reagent 121. Labeled samples were pooled, then desalted and fractionated using strong cation exchange chromatography, as previously described.9 (link),10 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Peptide Labeling with iTRAQ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were labeled with iTRAQ reagents according to the manufacturer's instructions (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA). To quantify 12 samples, 2 batches of 8-plex iTRAQ labeling experiment were performed, with a mixture of 12 samples in equal amount as a bridge for comparison among different batches. Each aliquot (50 μg of peptide equivalent) was reacted with one tube of iTRAQ reagent. After the sample was dissolved in 15 μL of 0.5 M TEAB solution, pH 8.5, the iTRAQ reagent was dissolved in 50 μL of isopropanol. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The 8-plex labeled samples in the same experiment branch was pooled together and lyophilized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of RXFP3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein concentrations were assessed a second time after trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation overnight at 4°C using 1/3 volume of TCA, to ensure correct protein levels. For each sample 100 μg of protein was reduced using 5mM Tris-2-(carboxyethyl)-phosphine hydrochloride solution (TCEP; Pierce Biotechnology) and cysteine blocking was performed with 2mM methyl methanethiosulphonate (MMTS) solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Each sample containing 100 μg proteins, was digested using 10 μg trypsin (Promega) at 37°C overnight. Samples were then labelled using iTRAQ reagents (ABSciex) before being pooled into one mixture. The following iTRAQ labels were used for the transfected cells: iTRAQ labels 113 was used for the transfected cells with the pcDNA3.1+ empty plasmid; iTRAQ labels from 114 to 118 were used to label the differentially transfected cells with RXFP3 (114-0.5 μg_RXFP3-HA, 115-1 μg_RXFP3-HA, 116-2 μg_RXFP3-HA1, 117-5 μg_RXFP3-HA, 118-10 μg_RXFP3-HA). After labelling, the samples were pooled, dried down and dissolved with SCX buffer prior to SCX chromatography.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Membrane Fractionation and Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membrane fractions from sucrose gradients were diluted in PBS and pelleted at 100,000 × g for 60min at 4 °C. Membranes were resuspended in 0.1% SDS, 500 mm tri-ethyl ammonium bicarbonate, reductively alkylated (dithiothreitol/iodoacetamide), tryptically digested, and labeled with iTRAQ reagents (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were then pooled and fractionated by strong cation exchange into 9–26 fractions, each of which was separated over a 120 min linear gradient using a UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano LC system (Dionex Corporation/Thermo Scientific) coupled to a LTQ Orbitrap Velos Pro ms system (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Ovarian Tumor Peptides with iTRAQ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) was used to confirm the relative level of peptide expression in serum of ovarian tumor-bearing mice. All of the mouse serum samples (15 μl each) from each treatment group (injected with MSV-control siRNA or MSV-EphA2 siRNA) were pooled. To each serum pool, 10.2 μl of 5% TFA was added, and the peptides in solution were isolated by on-chip fractionation. The eluates from the group with the same treatment were combined, dried under vacuum centrifugation, and reconstituted in 0.5 M tetraethylammonium bromide (TEAB). Each of the iTRAQ reagents (AB-Sciex, Foster City, CA) was dissolved in 70 μl of ethanol for 2 min with vortexing and added directly to the dissolved peptides. The samples were mixed by vortexing and incubated for one hour at 25°C. The derivatized peptides were then pooled, dried under vacuum centrifugation, and re-dissolved in 0.1% TFA/water. Following desalting on a small C18 column (2 mm × 1 cm), the peak fractions were left to air dry before being re-dissolved in buffer (1% formic acid in water containing 5 mM ammonium acetate). The pooled, derivatized and desalted peptides were subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis on a LTQ-Orbitrap Elite. The data were analyzed and quantified using Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK, ver. 2.3) via Proteome Discoverer (Thermo Scientific, version 1.3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Proteome Profiling using iTRAQ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 100 µg proteins of each sample per tube were prepared. Then they were reduced with 12 mM (final concentration) dithiothreitol for 1 h at 37°C. Subsequently, protein alkylations were performed with 50 mM (final concentration) iodoacetamide for 1 h in dark at room temperature. Then the mixture was transferred to centrifugal units (VN01H02, Sartorius, Germany) and centrifuged at 12,000×g for 20 min, and then the filtrate was discarded. After centrifugation, 8 mM urea solution was added into the centrifugal units and centrifuged, this step was repeated twice. After that, 100 µL dilute buffer (50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate) was added into the centrifugal units and centrifuged. Then 50 µL dilute buffer containing 2 µg modified trypsin (Promega) was added into the centrifugal units at 37°C overnight. After trypsin digestion, the resulting peptides were collected using centrifugation. Then the peptides were labeled with iTRAQ reagents (AB Sciex, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For each sample of three time points (i.e., S1, S2, and S3) was iTRAQ labeled 3 times except S3. (i.e., 113-, 116-, 119- tags for S1, 3 replicates. 114-, 117-, 121- tags for S2, 3 replicates. 115-, 118- tags for S3, 2 replicates.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Protein Profiling Across Ages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal amounts of proteins from each group of different age cells (100 μg) were denatured with 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in 1 M tryethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) (ABSciex, Foster City, CA). The samples were then reduced for 1 h at 60 °C using 50 mM tris-(2-carboxyethy) phosphine (TCEP) (ABSciex), and cysteine-blocked with 84 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich) at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. The proteins were digested with spectrometry grade trypsin (Gold Mass, Promega, Madison,WI) at a concentration of 1:50 trypsin/protein for 16 h at 37 °C. Each peptide solution was labeled for 1.5 h at room temperature using the iTRAQ reagents previously reconstituted in 70 μL of ethanol, following the manufacture Protocol (ABSciex). The samples were labeled with iTRAQ reagents as follows: newborn: 119 and 121 as a control infant: 114; young: 116; pre-pubertal: 118; pubertal: 115; adult: 117. The reaction was stopped by adding deionized water, and the labeled samples were combined. The mixture was desalted using home-made stage-tips.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phosphoproteome Profiling of Gemcitabine Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to further clarify the underlying mechanisms, we used iTRAQ to compare the changes of phosphorylated proteins. Pancreatic cancer cells treated with DMSO or gemcitabine for 48 h were harvested, protein extracted, quantified, reduced, cysteine blocked, digested and labeled, then the phosphorylated peptides were enriched and analyzed on mass spectrometer. Concretely speaking, proteins from the Patu8988 pancreatic cancer cells after gemcitabine treatment were precipitated with cold acetone for 2 h at −20 °C, pelleted by centrifugation at 12000 g, air-dried and dissolved into dissociation buffer. The total protein solution was quantified by BCA protein assay kit and protein lysate was added to the samples of high concentration to make the final concentration the same between the two groups. What’s more, the same amount and same volumes of proteins for two groups were given reductive alkylation and enzymatic hydrolysis. Then, the samples were labeled with isobaric tagging reagents according to protocols. iTRAQ reagents were obtained from AB SCIEX. The control group was labelled with 113 and 114; the gemcitabine treated group was labelled with 115 and 116. The results were obtained from three experiments. For every experiment, two independent replicate samples of control and gemcitabine treated group were included.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteomic Analysis of miR-647 Downregulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
miR-647 antagomir was transfected into SW620 cells to downregulate the expression of miR-647 in SW620 cells, the negative control was used to represent the cells with a normal miR-647 expression. Then, the two protein samples were extracted from each cell and subjected to a LC-shot gun analysis using the iTRAQ method. Each peptide solution was labelled with one of the iTRAQ reagents (iTRAQ reporter ions of 115 and 117 mass/charge ratio) according to the manufacturer's instructions (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). The labelled peptides were pooled and fractionated via strong cation exchange (SCX) using a ChromXP C18-CL column (Eksigent parts of AB Sciex, Dublin, CA, USA) and analyzed with nano LC-MS/MS with a nano LC system (Eksigent parts of AB Sciex). A total of 5929 effective proteins were got from three independent experiments, among these 4,141 were differentially expressed (2,078 were downregulated and 2,063 were upregulated).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!