The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistica v 6

Manufactured by StatSoft
Sourced in United States, Poland, Germany

STATISTICA v. 6.0 is a comprehensive data analysis and visualization software suite developed by StatSoft. The software provides a range of statistical and analytical tools for data processing, modeling, and reporting. STATISTICA v. 6.0 is designed to handle a variety of data types and formats, enabling users to perform advanced statistical analyses, data mining, and predictive modeling. The software offers a user-friendly interface and a wide selection of statistical techniques and algorithms.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

56 protocols using statistica v 6

1

Schizophrenia Biomarker Identification via GAM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differences between groups were also assessed in a formalized statistical model of GAM (generalized additive model) [37 ,38 ] of semiparametric nature, which allowed for careful adjustment of the group (control versus schizophrenia) effect to sex and age (age effect was modeled by penalized spline with penalty coefficient estimation via generalized cross validation) [39 (link)].
GAM and ANOVA/ANCOVA modeling, chi-squared and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel testing was done in the R environment (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria [40 ]). Other statistics were calculated in Statistica v.6 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) and the ROC curve analysis by an online program (http://www.rad.jhmi.edu/jeng/javarad/roc/JROCFITi.html, accessed on 16 October 2022). Statistical significance is commented at the 5% level (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anova and Tukey Analysis of Trace Element Bioavailability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey post hoc comparisons were performed on the total dissolved SPW concentrations, DGT concentrations, R ratios, foliar element concentrations, foliar mineral masses and primary bean leaf DW yields to evaluate the influence of the treatment on TE (phyto)availability. Pearson correlation coefficients (linear regression) between soil, SPW and plant parameters were also calculated. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistica V. 6 software (StatSoft).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results were analysed statistically. The parameters on the nominal scale were characterized using the number and percentage, whereas those on the ordinal scale were characterized with arrhythmic mean and standard deviation. The differences or correlations between non-measurable parameters were determined using contingency tables and the χ2 independence test. Due to a non-normal distribution of the analysed variables, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to detect significant differences in unpaired features for the two groups. An inference error of 5% was assumed, hence p ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The statistical analysis was carried out using Statistica v. 6.0 software (Statsoft, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fusarium Analysis of Root and Stem

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SE values for all theses were calculated. Statistical analyses of data were performed using the statistical package STATISTICA v. 6.0 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). A one-way ANOVA was used to test the hypothesis of treatment differentiation with respect to Fusarium of both seminal root systems and stems. The means were then compared using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test, with a significance level (p) of 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Correlation of Biomarkers with Clinicopathological Features

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed with the use of Statistica v.6.0 software (Statsoft, Poland). The correlation between selected clinical and pathological features and the expression of VE-cadherin, MIG-7 mRNA, PAS+ structures in tumor specimens was analyzed using Pearson's χ 2 test or nonparametrical U Mann Whitney and Kruskall-Wallis ANOVA tests, where appropriate. The criterion of statistical significance applied in all calculations was p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Apnea Duration Analysis by Sleep Stage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The average values of all events of the same type were obtained for each subject enrolled, and these values were used for further analysis and for the calculation of the group mean values and their standard deviations as basic statistics.
We then checked for possible simultaneous effects of age, sex, and obstructive AHI (independent factors/predictors) on the duration of apnea and hypopnea during NREM and REM sleep separately (dependent variables) by means of the General Regression Models module offered by the commercially available software STATISTICA v.6, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA (this software was also used for all other statistical tests carried out in this study). This module allowed for the building of models for designs with categorical predictor variables, as well as with continuous predictor variables. For each dependent variable, three partial correlation coefficients were obtained, one for each independent factor, together with its statistical significance. Moreover, following the Cohen’s [11 ] indications, we considered correlation coefficients 0.10, 0.30, and 0.50 as corresponding to small, medium, and large sizes, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Size-Adjusted Morphological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Since morphological features can depend on the size of the individual rather than species or population level characteristics within a particular location [31 ,63 ], all continuous, meristic, and ordinal categorical features were size-adjusted before any analysis using the method of Lleonart [64 (link)]. This procedure scales all individuals to the same size (i.e., bell diameter) and adjusts each morphological feature taking into account potential allometric differences among species or within species in different habitats using the formula:
Y*=(f1m/f1i)b
where Y* is the size-corrected morphological feature in the individual i,Yi is the measured morphological feature in individual i, f1iis the bell diameter of the individual i, f1m is the mean (arithmetic) bell diameter of all individuals in the dataset, and b is the within-location, within-lineage, slope of the regression between log10(f1i) and log10(Yi). Correlations were used to determine whether significant relationships existed between bell diameter and size-corrected continuous (Pearson correlations) and ordinal categorical (Spearman correlations) features using the software Statistica v.6 (Statsoft, Inc.). Nominal categorical features exhibiting a significant correlation with size were not included in subsequent analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Normality Testing and Comparative Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All variables were checked for normality by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Descriptive statistics were estimated by the sample mean with 95% confidence interval. The differences between groups were tested using analysis of variance test followed by Least Significant Difference post hoc tests. Levene's test of homogeneity of variance was run before analysis of variance to verify the equal variances in groups. Paired variables were tested by a student's t-test. All statistical tests were 2-tailed. Whole statistical analysis was conducted with Statistica v.6 (StatSoft Inc, Tulsa, OK), and the significance level was set as default to 0.05 (5%). Initially, the minimum sample size was verified by using Statistica software. At least 19 subjects must have been included in each of the 3 tested groups, to achieve a power of 80% with α = 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Inoculation Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the software Statistica v. 6 (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). Data were first tested for normality with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and for homogeneity of variance with the Brown–Forsythe test. Comparisons between means in different inoculation and co-inoculation treatments at the end of the experiment were made by using generalizer linear models (GLM). Significant test results were followed by Fisher tests (LSD) for identification of important contrasts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Gestational Age Effects on Sleep Disorders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were calculated using commercially available software STATIS-TICA v.6, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA. Because of the non-normal distribution of the data, nonparametric descriptives were used. The chi-square test was used to compare frequencies. To test the eventual effect of gestational age at birth on the PLMS index or LMM index, we also carried out two multiple regression analyses by considering these factors as dependent variables. A set of independent predictors that could influence these parameters, such as gestational age at birth, age at PSG, sleep efficiency, arousal index, oAHI, and LMM index if the dependent variable was the PLMS index, and vice versa, were also included. F correlation coefficients of 0.1 were considered small, 0.3 medium, and 0.5 or above large based on Cohen [15] . Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!