The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using opal620

1

Multiplex Immunohistochemistry for Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mIHC was performed using the Opal 7-color IHC kit (PerkinElmer) as previously described.25 (link) Briefly, FFPE sections (4 µm thick) were dewaxed and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer (PH=6.0), and endogenous peroxidase was quenched using 3% H2O2 for 15 min. The slides were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin for 15 min and then incubated with primary antibodies of two panels overnight, including CD3, CD4, CD20, Foxp3 and PD-1; CD8, CD56, CD68, CD163 and PD-L1 (online supplemental table 1). Then, slides were incubated with corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and fluorescent dyes with the following order: Opal540, Opal570, Opal620, Opal650 and Opal690 (PerkinElmer). Nuclei was stained with DAPI (PerkinElmer). Subsequently, the slides were scanned and imaged using the Mantra Quantitative Pathology Workstation (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Images were obtained for the following analysis using the inForm Advanced Image Analysis software (V.2.4.2, PerkinElmer). Multispectral images were unmixed using spectral libraries obtained from images of single-stained slides for each marker. For subregions with multiple TLSs, the densities and frequencies of each marker were averaged to represent the cellular composition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tumor tissue was initially fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and cut into 5 μm thick sections. The sections were blocked with 10% goat serum and incubated with anti-TOP2A (1:200, Cat#12286, CST) or anti-CENPF (1:200, Cat#ab224813, Abcam), or anti-ki-67 (1:200, M00254-9, Boster) antibodies at 4°Cat night. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with a secondary antibody conjugated with anti-mouse or rabbit horseradish peroxidase at room temperature for 1 hour. Paraffin sections were stained with DAB and hematoxylin. The IHC section slides were observed by a microscope (Nikon, Japan). Multiplexed immunofluorescence was performed as we previously described.81 (link) Opal-520, Opal-620 (PerkinElmer) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were applied to each antibody for visualization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Paraffin Embedding and Immunofluorescence Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were fixed in Z7 zinc based fixative[31 (link)] overnight. Tissue was then processed for paraffin tissue sections. Tissue was dehydrated through graded alcohol to xylene, incubated in molten paraffin using a Tissue-Tek automated tissue processor (Sakura, Torrance, CA), and then embedded in paraffin. 5 μm sections were cut and mounted for analysis. Trichrome stain was performed according to manufacturer’s protocol (Cardinal Health, Dublin, OH). Primary antibody binding was visualized with Alexa Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), Opal 520, or Opal 620 secondary antibodies (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) following either ImmPRESS HRP anti-rabbit or anti-rat polymer incubation (Vector laboratories). Sections were stained with DAPI (Perkin Elmer) for nuclear staining and mounted with FluoromountG (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images were acquired using: Vectra imaging software (Perkin Elmer); a Leica SCN400 whole slide scanner or a SCN400F fluorescence whole slide scanner. All images displayed in the manuscript are representative of the entire tumor and their respective experimental cohort. NIH image J software was used to separate into their single marker components, to set threshold to minimize back ground noise, and to quantify the positive pixel area in each image. Minimum of 4 tumors per cohort were utilized for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplex Immunohistochemistry for Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded tumor sections were deparaffinized, blocked, and stained with primary antibodies as described21 (link). Sequential staining was achieved with anti-mouse CD4 (clone 4SM95), Opal520 (PerkinElmer), CD8 (4SM15), and Opal620 with washes performed in Amplification Plus buffer (PerkinElmer). Nuclei counterstaining was achieved with Spectral DAPI. Slides were imaged on a Vectra Polaris Imager (PerkinElmer) and analyzed with QuPath software22 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Immunohistochemistry and RNA Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on a Leica Bond-RX autostainer (Leica Biosystems, USA) with antibody targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Abcam, ab272504) at 2 μg·mL−1. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed in buffer ER1 at 100°C for 20 min, and the signal visualised with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate. Slides were imaged using a Zeiss Axioscanner (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and immunohistochemistry was scored by a pathologist for bronchiolar epithelium, type 2 pneumocytes, interstitial lymphocytes and alveolar macrophage compartments.
RNAscope probes (ACDBio, USA) targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA (nCoV2019, #848561-C3), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)2 host receptor mRNA (#848151-C2) and host serine transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2) mRNA (#470341-C1) were used per manufacturer's instructions for automation on Leica Bond RX. DNA was visualised with Syto13 (ThermoFisher Scientific), channel 1 with Opal 570 (1:500), channel 2 with Opal 620 (1:1500) and channel 3 with Opal 690 (1:1500) (PerkinElmer). Fluorescent images were acquired with NanoString Mars prototype DSP at 20×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!