The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rtx 2080 ti gpu

Manufactured by NVIDIA

The NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti is a high-performance GPU designed for advanced graphics and computing applications. It features Turing architecture, a total of 4,352 CUDA cores, 11GB of GDDR6 video memory, and a boost clock speed of up to 1,635 MHz. The RTX 2080 Ti provides powerful processing capabilities for demanding tasks such as video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using rtx 2080 ti gpu

1

3D Unet-like GAN for Image Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We created the implementations of the multi-task 3D Unet-like generator, patchGAN discriminator, L1 and cGAN loss functions, GAN stabilizing techniques and all other related training/testing scripts in pytorch and we conducted all our experiments on a Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti GPU with 11 GB VRAM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Deep Learning-based fNIRS Signal Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the training and simulation processes were run on a desktop computer with a 12-core Ryzen 9 3900x processor, 64 GB memory, and an NVIDIA RTX 2080Ti GPU, using Keras (https://keras.io) with a Tensorflow backend, which is an open-source library for deep learning. Ten percent of the training data was split as the validation set, and an early stopping technique with a patience of 20 was used to avoid over-fitting with a batch size of 100. The hyper-parameters were empirically determined, and the random seed was set to 0. The pre-processed fNIRS data were fed into the proposed network after z-score normalization over the time axis to compensate for intrinsic amplitude differences among participants (Erkan and Akbaba, 2018 (link)). The network was trained to minimize the categorical cross-entropy loss function using the Adamax optimizer (Kingma and Ba, 2014 ; Vani and Rao, 2019 (link)) with a learning rate of 0.0005, decay of 5 × 10−8.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Segmentation using nnUNet and MLNet

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the segmentation part, we trained a 4-fold nnUNet and then inferred the predicted masks and corresponding feature maps of 4 stages (from coarse to fine, see Fig. 4 for feature visualization) for both 4-fold validation and external validation. After segmentation training, we split the development data (6 centres, with 412 patients) into a training set (4 centres, 317 patients) and an internal validation set (2 centres, 95 patients). MLNet, as well as other models in the ablation analysis, were constructed using a training cohort, internally validated and further validated on the external validation cohort. The pipeline was constructed using PyTorch40 . Both nnUNet and MLNet were trained on an NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti GPU. During the training of nnUNet, all the hyperparameters were automatically configured. During the training of MLNet, the batch size was set to 4 and the initial learning rate was 1e − 4. Weighted binary cross entropy was used as the loss function. Adam41 was used as the optimiser. Additionally, shape-aware minimisation (SAM)42 simultaneously minimising loss value and loss sharpness was adopted. To avoid overfitting, training patience was set to 10. The best model was saved with the best loss on the internal validation set.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Deep-Learning-Based MRI Reconstruction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DC-RDN was implemented using TensorFlow package (version R2.0; https://tensorflow.google.org). All the training and testing were performed on a desktop computer with an Intel Xeon® Gold 6128 quad-core CPU, 64-GB RAM, and an NVIDIA RTX 2080Ti GPU.
During the training process, the network weights were initialized using the He initialization [35 ] and optimized using the Adam algorithm [36 ] with a fixed learning rate of 0.0002, β1 = 0.9, β2 = 0.999, and batch size of 8. The mean-squared error between the DC-RDN reconstructed results and the FS images was chosen as the loss function. Total training time was about 4 h for 200 epochs. Once the training process is completed, the parameters of DC-RDN are fixed, which can be adopted to effectively transform new undersampled DW-MRI data to the corresponding reconstruction results directly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Joint Reconstruction Framework

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total loss of our framework is then calculated by considering the calibrator, reconstructor(s), and discriminator as a whole, i.e., to minimize L=α·LR+β·LC+γ·LD, where α , β , γ are scalar weights for each component network.
We implement the proposed solution with PyTorch (version 1.3.1) and Sklearn (version 0.21.3). The downstream analysis has been carried out using Python (version 3.6.8), and R (version 3.6.3) for visualization. For details, we use ADAM [33 ] for training with default settings (i.e., the exponential decay rate of the first/second moment estimation). All the experiments are run on the same host with 16 GB memory and an Nvidia RTX 2080Ti GPU.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Deep Clustering and Fine-tuning Framework

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the pretraining and clustering stages, our model is trained for 50k iterations with a learning rate of 1e-4 and another 1k iterations with a learning rate of 1e-5. The batch size of training is 1024 and Adam (Kingma and Ba, 2014 ) is used for optimization. All methods were tested on a computer equipped with a 2.1 GHz Intel Xeon E5 CPU (8 DIMMs; 32 GB Memory) and an NVIDIA RTX 2080Ti GPU. Deep learning methods were implemented with Pytorch (v1.7.1) (Paszke et al., 2019 ). The weight of clustering loss λ was set to be 0.1, as suggested in (Guo et al., 2017 ). The source code and the trained model will be made available at https://github.com/SlicerDMRI/DFC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Benchmark Predictive Models for Compound Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CCGNet is constructed under the opensource ML framework of TensorFlow82 . CCGNet outputs two-dimensional vectors [a, b] which represent the predictive scores for negative and positive class, respectively. If b > a, the output is labeled as the positive sample, and vice versa. Supplementary Methods describes details regarding constructions of SVM, RF, DNN-des, DNN-FP, GCN, Graph-CNN, and enn-s2s. Bayesian optimization is used to search the optimal hyper-parameters for all the models (see Supplementary Methods). The representation of the samples is implemented by RDkit, OpenBabel, and CCDC Python Application Programming Interface. We train the models on Nvidia RTX 2080ti GPU.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Tooth Image Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In Section 2.2, a tooth image database is collected consisting of 6028 teeth, which will be divided into training, validation and testing sets. We use the training set to train all the models, save the model according to the performance on the validation set, and test the models on the testing set with the saved model. Before training, we resize all the images of size 224×224 , which is essential because different tooth images have different sizes due to the non-restricting rectangular boxes. Additionally, we perform image contrast enhancement by adjusting the intensity of each pixel, which we found to be useful in the experiments.
As for the hyper-parameters used, we set the dimension (C in Figure 2), mini-batch size, learning rate and the maximum training iterations to be 96, 32, 103 and 3000, respectively. As for the computing resources, we used an assembled server, which is configured with 2 × Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240R CPU and NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti GPU (12 GB Ram).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Optimized Deep Learning Inference

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The server used is configured with Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240R CPU and NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti GPU (12GB ram), and the system is CentOS Linux release 7.8.2003. As for the hyperparameters, the network parameters are iterated for up to 10000 epochs using the Adam optimizer. The mini-batch size and the learning rate are set as 32 and 10−3, respectively. We select the model with the best performance on the validation set and then deployed to obtain the diagnosis results on the test set. Finally, the number of selected neighbors is set to be 3, and we will test the influence of varying numbers of neighbors in the following experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GPU-Accelerated Deep Learning Model Training

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The models were trained on a desktop workstation with the following specifications: 64 GB of memory; an Intel Xeon® W-214 CPU; and an NVIDIA RTX 2080Ti GPU with 11 GB of video memory. The workstation operated on Windows 11 (64-bit), and the training was conducted using Python 3.9 with the deep learning platform CUDA 11.6 and the Pytorch framework.
The quality of the training model is significantly influenced by the difference in training parameters, and hyperparameters such as the learning rate, batch size, and number of iterations must be set manually during the training process. Among them, the learning rate is crucial in deep learning optimizers as it determines the speed at which weights are updated. If the learning rate is too high, the training results will exceed the optimal value, while if it is too low, the model will converge too slowly. The batch size depends on the size of the computer memory, with larger batches providing better model training results. The number of iterations determines the number of training rounds, with more iterations taking longer to complete. The iteration typically ends when the loss value has fully converged. After several parameter adjustments, the parameters in the model were set according to the values provided in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!